It is historically accurate for the heir to be chosen based on hereditary ranking by the computer immediately upon the crowning of a new King. It is NOT historically accurate for this to be unchangable. There were many situations in which hereditary rules were tossed out the window at the convenience of various nations. The War of Spanish Succession and the Glorious Revolution spring immediately to mind. If you want to be historically accurate, give a major loyalty drop to the disinherited family member and perhaps even an increase in unrest in all settlement and a decrease in relations with foreign powers. However, simply forbidding the choice altogether is NOT historically accurate.Originally Posted by frogbeastegg
If you want concrete proof of why it is not, consider the following:
King Postmortem dies at a relatively youthful age due to Chronic Sword Through Heart Syndrome. His heir, Prince Flacid, inherits, but is not yet married and does not have a son. The game automatically makes the now King Flacid\'s eldest brother, Prince Windfall the heir. King Flacid then marries the foreign Princess Viagratia and they produce a son, Prince Thoughtunlikely. The game will now prevent Prince Thoughtunlikely from inheriting his rightful throne and his uncle Prince Windfall will become the next king, even though he would have been instantly removed as heir in any medieval European monarchy.
All in all, the option should be there in some form.
Bookmarks