Er... the one person whose behavior really sets off my alarms at this point, and who I'd like an explanation from, is Seamus Fermanagh.

Why is this? Originally it was because mathematically, he's registered a definite behavior change from past games. He posts less and his posts are generally shorter. This doesn't mean much, but it was enough to get my attention and make me look into the content of his posts.

What I've seen there looks innocuous on the surface - as in past games, he's posted voting records and some commentary on them. We know him well enough by now that it's obligatory that he do this - I'm confident he would do it whether he was a mafioso or not.

But something's a bit off. The commentary this time is much lighter, not very focused, and lacking the insightful confidence that was there in previous games. At least once he's tried to "pass the buck" by asking for guidance from my system - a system which, as I've said several times, is a new concept and in need of refinement. The "confused" attitude displayed by Seamus reminds me of some of my own behavior from Mafia III, when I was guilty.

Note: There is a lot of room in my current method for adjustments and additions, and as this game is its first test, I expect to come up with quite a few ideas for the next game.

I want to hear Seamus' explanation for this. To me, he is a much stronger suspect than Crazed Rabbit.