It does look real, but without the Holmgang value, it isn't as useful as a counter-check to pevergreen's claim.

Obviously, not naming the champion was simply good sense.


Voting records suggest that Sasaki and Ichigo are not operating as a jotun team. Sasaki voted for Ichigo in round two, during a round when a shift of one vote would have killed Ichigo and when voting was so confused that he could easily have moved away to protect Ichigo by reducing vote count without drawing suspicion.

This doesn't clear either as an individual, but strongly suggests that they are not operating as 2/3 of a jotun team.



The Valhalla quotient just snapped into place for me. Notation at death that they arise to Valhalla indicates their status as being some form of warrior and not Jotun (or possibly a thrall who actually beats the odds and wins a holmgang proving he has the heart of a warrior).

Those who do not arise to Valhalla are either God [no need], Jotun [bad] or thrall [no warrior prowess].



Other "gods" possibly present:

Thor [anti-jotun], Odin [king of gods, probably neutral], Balder, Frey, Hodr,
Vanir = Aegir [mostly anti-jotun, not a friend of Thor], Vidar. A number of other less storied are there as well.

Famous Jotun:

Surt, Thiassi, Thokk, Thyrm [special opponent of Thor], Skrymir, Hrungnir [special opponent of Thor], Hugi, Angbroda


Heimdall v. Loki was only one of the famous rivalries of the Norse gods.

From this, I hypothesize the existence of at least one more god among us -- possibly with an opposing god or special role jotun (started unknown to other jotun as well).



My vote, at least for now is Vote: pevergreen

I mislike the quality of his reveal. Omanes is suspect, but the PM is important and the lack thereof somewhat surprising -- particularly in light of your experience in Capo, pev'.