Obelics, your historical info is inaccurate.
Gnaeus Pompeius Magnus and Gaius Iulius Caesar were both Republicans, even though Caesar had declared himself dictator. We can speculate whether Caesar wanted to be Emperor of Rome, or not.
The war between Marcus Iunius Brutus with Gaius Cassius Longinus versus Marcus Antionus was also a pure Republican War. It wasn't a war to decide who would become emperor.
Finally, only Octavianus "Augustus" was an imperialist. As I said, it is a matter of speculation whether Marcus Antonius wanted to become emperor, but to be honest, I don't think so.
==================================
That would be most historically inaccurate. It wasn't like Diodotos Baktrios was Basileus of the Seleucid Empire and then decided 'hey, there's a cute little country, let's run it!'I know its impossible but if that did work then the way to play as Baktria could be playing as the AS until some requirements are met then choosing to play as AS or Baktria.
What would be more historically accurate if there was something like this:
-Baktria is in command of the city of Baktra, maybe Marakanda or Alexandreia-Eschate (little chance though).
-Hardcode that doesn't allow the Arche Seleukeia to attack Baktria, or vice-versa.
-Every turn, Baktria gets some money from Seleukeia to spend on construction, that kind of stuff.
-Finally, Baktria would have the same color as Seleukeia UNTIL they finally really split.
Bookmarks