Results 1 to 23 of 23

Thread: Phalanx Vs. Phalanx

  1. #1

    Angry Phalanx Vs. Phalanx

    It is retarded!!
    I mean i am fighting with the Ptolemies, and we both have phalanx dominated armies (I am playing as the Seleucids). The problem is when the phalanxes meet in battle ( They are the same type, same stamina, equal terrain, same experience). It doesn't matter if I am attacking or defending. So, the twin phalanxes meet. At first they both kill a few men, but thats when it starts. The enemy start killing my men at an enormously fast rate ( and my men don't kill almost anything). I always have to flank with some units or they will rout. If i didn't have cavalry ( Hetairoi )I think that victory would be almost impossible.

    Whats with this? If anybody has some tips for battles I would appreciate it.

  2. #2
    Prince of Maldonia Member Toby and Kiki Champion, Goo Slasher Champion, Frogger Champion woad&fangs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    2,884

    Default Re: Phalanx Vs. Phalanx

    what difficulty are you playing on? If you're playing with battles on hard or very hard then in a one vs. one fight between two identical units your unit will always lose. The units are balanced for medium battle settings.
    Last edited by woad&fangs; 03-15-2008 at 18:53.
    Why did the chicken cross the road?

    So that its subjects will view it with admiration, as a chicken which has the daring and courage to boldly cross the road,
    but also with fear, for whom among them has the strength to contend with such a paragon of avian virtue? In such a manner is the princely
    chicken's dominion maintained. ~Machiavelli

  3. #3
    Like the Parthian Boot Member Elmetiacos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    The Forests of Roestoc
    Posts
    1,770

    Default Re: Phalanx Vs. Phalanx

    You're sure your phalanxes are the same type and that it's not elite phalanx vs. native phalanx or something? If they are the same, it could be you have a worse general or the enemy's armour has been improved by blacksmiths or that they are more experienced soldiers.
    'you owe it to that famous chick general whose name starts with a B'
    OILAM TREBOPALA INDI PORCOM LAEBO INDI INTAM PECINAM ELMETIACUI

  4. #4
    amrtaka Member machinor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Austria 'n Italy
    Posts
    464

    Default Re: Phalanx Vs. Phalanx

    First of all, you have to take into account, that phalanxes are defensive units. So if you fight a phalanx with and equal phalanx, march them close to the other one and then order them to halt (by pressing backspace). The phalanxes will then lock fronts. This is all. Do not order them to attack because their strength is defense not offense. Only do that if your facing inferior phalanxes (like levy or kleruchoi phalanxes with pezhetairoi) or if you have an advantage in numbers or terrain. If you have phalanxes, always bring some flanking units like peltasts or better thureophoroi with you.
    Quote Originally Posted by NickTheGreek View Post
    "Dahae always ride single file to hid their numbers, these tracks are side by side. And these arrow wounds, too accurate for Dahae, only Pahlavi Zradha Shivatir are so precise..."
    <-- My "From Basileion to Arche - A Makedonian AAR" Memorial Balloon.

  5. #5

    Default Re: Phalanx Vs. Phalanx

    Im playing on medium. And yep their pantadapoi vs. machimoi. I never press attack because they would brake their formation, it happens when i'm holding still and the enemy comes to me. I thought it was that they were on higher ground, the terrain when it happens is flat. Perhaps its the general. Their generals always have some ten stars, and mine rarely has over one.
    Last edited by Maximus Aurelius; 03-15-2008 at 19:07.

  6. #6
    EB TRIBVNVS PLEBIS Member MarcusAureliusAntoninus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    The State of Jefferson, USA
    Posts
    5,722

    Default Re: Phalanx Vs. Phalanx

    There seems to be a bug with PvP, where if you are attacked by a parrallel phalanx, your guys will simply hold their ground, not fight back, and die. If you tell them to attack, they will stopt this. Though, as you said, this will make them break formation. You can also try turning of defensive formation, but this too will result in a broken formation. This is not a EB bug but a RTW bug...


  7. #7

    Default Re: Phalanx Vs. Phalanx

    Quote Originally Posted by Maximus Aurelius
    Im playing on medium. And yep their pantadapoi vs. machimoi. I never press attack because they would brake their formation, it happens when i'm holding still and the enemy comes to me. I thought it was that they were on higher ground, the terrain when it happens is flat. Perhaps its the general. Their generals always have some ten stars, and mine rarely has over one.
    High star generals increase defence of his units. If they have 8-10 star monster it's like they had 5-6 points of armour more.

    One of CA guys said this in this forum some time ago.

    EB ship system destroyer and Makedonia FC

  8. #8
    Βασιλευς και Αυτοκρατωρ Αρχης Member Centurio Nixalsverdrus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Γερμανια Ελευθερα
    Posts
    2,321

    Default AW: Phalanx Vs. Phalanx

    Ram them and then hit backspace.

  9. #9
    Villiage Idiot Member antisocialmunky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    ゞ( ゚Д゚)ゞ
    Posts
    5,974

    Default Re: AW: Phalanx Vs. Phalanx

    Using a equal or better phalanx, form them into a square, take them off of guard, and order attack and watch them split the other phalanx in half.
    Fighting isn't about winning, it's about depriving your enemy of all options except to lose.



    "Hi, Billy Mays Here!" 1958-2009

  10. #10
    Amanuensis Member pezhetairoi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    South of Sabara
    Posts
    2,719

    Default Re: AW: Phalanx Vs. Phalanx

    antisocialmunky is right. Taking the phalanx off guard mode is perhaps the key to getting them to close without simply taking damage. Guard mode boosts defence but drops attack (based on my inspection of a hoplitai vs thureophoroi battle, one on guard and one off), and if the opposing army has equal attack to you, sooner or later he is going to punch through while your attack-disadvantaged people will be badly hurt and unable to fight back. Attack beats defence anytime, as the drapanai could tell you. That 15-18 pike attack is not really 15-18 when fighting in phalanx on guard, or else you'd make mincemeat of any unit you care to allow to charge your front.


    EB DEVOTEE SINCE 2004

  11. #11

    Default Re: Phalanx Vs. Phalanx

    I'll have to try phalanxes again. I hate how many casualties happen no matter how fast I try to flank. I thought I needed to build up a lot of experience chevrons before people stopped dieing.

  12. #12

    Default Re: Phalanx Vs. Phalanx

    Thanks for the replies guys. I'm gonna try turning off the guard mode, and see how it works.

  13. #13
    Villiage Idiot Member antisocialmunky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    ゞ( ゚Д゚)ゞ
    Posts
    5,974

    Default Re: Phalanx Vs. Phalanx

    The only side effect is that the phalanxes practically explode and you have guys running backwards all the way across the map.
    Fighting isn't about winning, it's about depriving your enemy of all options except to lose.



    "Hi, Billy Mays Here!" 1958-2009

  14. #14

    Default Re: Phalanx Vs. Phalanx

    Quote Originally Posted by antisocialmunky
    The only side effect is that the phalanxes practically explode and you have guys running backwards all the way across the map.
    Nothing new, I'd say.

  15. #15
    Amanuensis Member pezhetairoi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    South of Sabara
    Posts
    2,719

    Default Re: Phalanx Vs. Phalanx

    XD was about to say that. It's only a question of WHY they're running backwards all the way across the map.


    EB DEVOTEE SINCE 2004

  16. #16
    Villiage Idiot Member antisocialmunky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    ゞ( ゚Д゚)ゞ
    Posts
    5,974

    Default Re: Phalanx Vs. Phalanx

    Or backflipping, don't forget those guys.
    Fighting isn't about winning, it's about depriving your enemy of all options except to lose.



    "Hi, Billy Mays Here!" 1958-2009

  17. #17
    Not your friend Member General Appo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    As far away from you as possible. Scuzzbucket.
    Posts
    1,645

    Default Re: Phalanx Vs. Phalanx

    Me, I think it&#180;s a extremely bad case of innate cowardness and stupidity. Why else would you back away 300 meters from your unit without noticing that a bunch of Equites Extraordinarii are charging at your back? Stupid Greeks, they&#180;re better of enslaved by the Imperuim Romanum.
    The Appomination

    I don't come here a lot any more. You know why? Because you suck. That's right, I'm talking to you. Your annoying attitude, bad grammar, illogical arguments, false beliefs and pathetic attempts at humour have driven me and many other nice people from this forum. You should feel ashamed. Report here at once to recieve your punishment. Scumbag.

  18. #18
    Amanuensis Member pezhetairoi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    South of Sabara
    Posts
    2,719

    Default Re: Phalanx Vs. Phalanx

    Aye! Couldn't agree more.

    /spam

    ...+1?
    Last edited by pezhetairoi; 03-17-2008 at 01:54.


    EB DEVOTEE SINCE 2004

  19. #19

    Default Re: Phalanx Vs. Phalanx

    HAIL CAESAR!


    Join the Army: A Pontic AAR
    https://forums.totalwar.org/vb/showthread.php?t=96984
    ...uh coptic mother****er:A Makuria Comedy AAR
    https://forums.totalwar.org/vb/showt...93#post1814493

  20. #20

    Lightbulb Re: Phalanx Vs. Phalanx

    antisocialmonkey i agree with that .
    but always keep a unit of heavy infantry by their side if youre gonna fight Phalanx vs Phalanx .
    if youre losing . then thats where ur infantry comes handy :)
    Edvard0
    Only the evil will triumph if good men do nothing .
    Edmund . . . .


  21. #21

    Default Re: Phalanx Vs. Phalanx

    Quote Originally Posted by O'ETAIPOS
    High star generals increase defence of his units. If they have 8-10 star monster it's like they had 5-6 points of armour more.

    One of CA guys said this in this forum some time ago.
    Since 2004, I've heard that too, in many versions actually. Either command stars give a bonus to attack, or defence, or both, or to morale in general, or to morale only within a certain range around the general. But which is true?

    If it is defence, and given that in EB you often fight enemy generals, especially Rebel generals with 7-10 stars, how can it be that your own troops have the slightest chance? Is defence not that important?

  22. #22
    Member Member Sand's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Kildare, Ireland
    Posts
    57

    Default Re: Phalanx Vs. Phalanx

    I believe the command star bonus is to attack, which would explain why when fight the AI generals their equivalent units can rip you a new one in a straight up fight.

    Ive not encountered too many phalanx vs phalanx issues to be honest - a Phalanx will only suffer badly if its going up against a superior phalanx [ Levies vs Pehzatoi or Elites] and even then the loss rate is low enough that by the time your heavy cavalry has driven off the enemy cavalary and is carrying out 400 man charges into the rear of the enemy line, your phalanx will have suffered only 30-40% casualties absolute max.

  23. #23

    Default Re: Phalanx Vs. Phalanx

    Quote Originally Posted by Sand
    I believe the command star bonus is to attack, which would explain why when fight the AI generals their equivalent units can rip you a new one in a straight up fight.

    Ive not encountered too many phalanx vs phalanx issues to be honest - a Phalanx will only suffer badly if its going up against a superior phalanx [ Levies vs Pehzatoi or Elites] and even then the loss rate is low enough that by the time your heavy cavalry has driven off the enemy cavalary and is carrying out 400 man charges into the rear of the enemy line, your phalanx will have suffered only 30-40% casualties absolute max.

    Sorry but its not...

    https://forums.totalwar.org/vb/showp...4&postcount=19


    Originally Posted by JeromeGrasdyke
    Just to clear this up ( as requested ;-) ), from the old code on my machine at CA the General's command modifier on attacks is still there in the last version, but it only applies to melee attacks and it is -inverted- so the quality of the defender's general is applied as bonus directionless defense for the defending soldier. It is also rescaled to range from -6 to +6, changing quickly at low bonus levels and then slowing down towards the top of the range. The idea was to limit the number of stacking bonusses which speed up the battles, i vaguely remember.

    Also, the bonus is not limited by physical distance, and is supposed to represent a good general's ability to get superior performance from his troops through training in small scale maneuvers. The only way for this bonus to result in faster combat death rates rather than slower ones is if the defender's general has bad command traits...

    If you want to test it, I would suggest a battle between some big peasant units, fighting the units 1v1 and timing the length of time to rout; then repeat giving each army a 10 star general. You should see a slower time-to-rout with the generals. In the end though 6 pts is not enough to make up huge troop quality differences, so don't expect to see miraculous differences.
    Those who would give up essential liberties for a perceived sense of security deserve neither liberty nor security--Benjamin Franklin

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO