Results 1 to 17 of 17

Thread: Supremacy at sea (not for fun)

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default Re: Supremacy at sea (not for fun)

    But You don't need a big fleet to supply your distant troops. So, the title of this subject is about SUPREMACY and how force players to keep big and very expensive navy.

    Look at history, e.g. naval supremacy was key and pivotal factor during wars between Rome and Carthage.

    Huge money penalty could support awkward and uncoordinated AI actions at sea.

    So it will be your choice: suffer from economic blockade or engage in expensive warfare at sea.

  2. #2
    The Creator of Stories Member Parallel Pain's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Sitting on the Throne of My Empires
    Posts
    380

    Default Re: Supremacy at sea (not for fun)

    supremacy is relative

    if none of the other factions have ships, all you need to have spremacy is enough to prevent pirates from sinking you.

    but if you are unlucky like me
    Last edited by Parallel Pain; 03-18-2008 at 10:32.

  3. #3
    Amanuensis Member pezhetairoi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    South of Sabara
    Posts
    2,719

    Default Re: Supremacy at sea (not for fun)

    problem is, blockading one port is not enough to hurt income unless you are an archipelago faction dependent completely on sea trade, or a faction on the brink of going into the red. factions are rarely rich enough to support multiple fleets to hurt more than one city at once. Even when I controlled all Europe with 5 Marian fullstacks and top-level mines, i could only afford to blockade all African Qarthadastim ports with one oneraria each. But to increase enemy faction income enough to build enough fleets to devote even one oneraria ship to each port would be overpowering them beyond, because, on the Vanilla engine at least, there's no guarantee the budget would be spent on naval matters.

    My two cents.
    Last edited by pezhetairoi; 03-18-2008 at 10:51.


    EB DEVOTEE SINCE 2004

  4. #4
    Member Member zooeyglass's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Oxford, England
    Posts
    245

    Default Re: Supremacy at sea (not for fun)

    Quote Originally Posted by pezhetairoi
    problem is, blockading one port is not enough to hurt income unless you are an archipelago faction dependent completely on sea trade, or a faction on the brink of going into the red. factions are rarely rich enough to support multiple fleets to hurt more than one city at once. Even when I controlled all Europe with 5 Marian fullstacks and top-level mines, i could only afford to blockade all African Qarthadastim ports with one oneraria each. But to increase enemy faction income enough to build enough fleets to devote even one oneraria ship to each port would be overpowering them beyond, because, on the Vanilla engine at least, there's no guarantee the budget would be spent on naval matters.

    My two cents.
    i found waiting and then building two fleets of 3 triremes each means you are never going to lose those fleets, and they can be retrained/roam the waters at will. in my mak campaign i have them, plus 1 large bireme fleet (4 units) plus at least a couple of oneraria fleets knocking around for transport from homeland to the fronts (italia/asia minor). but i think i went over the top with naval power - in theory i could split up my fleets and blockade every still ptolemaioi port if i wanted...

    does anyone know how much a port city loses in terms of a blockade? would they lose up to 50% income? more? less? any idea how to calculate it?
    inde consilivm mihi pavca de Avgvsto et extrema tradere, mox Tiberii principatum et cetera, sine ira et stvdio, qvorvm cavsas procvl habeo.

  5. #5

    Default Re: Supremacy at sea (not for fun)

    You don't need a large navy against all enemies, but in my game I waged war against the Ptolies, and they had a sizable navy themselves. I had a fleet of one quinquireme and two triremes under a 5 star admiral with very nice retinue, and he could kill anything because the AI didn't bother to create a single large fleet to attack me. Maybe they just rebuild in a port I did not have under watch, and then sent their single fleets against me, I don't know. I also had three of four smaller ships to blockade Ptoly ports, but they had to flee when the AI sent their quin or tri fleets.

  6. #6

    Default Re: Supremacy at sea (not for fun)

    What do you think about decreasing value of pirate_spawn_value in decr_strat (which effects in increasing the spawn of rebels at sea)?

    It could cause more blockades from pirate fleets and finally force players to support larger fleet, but from the other hand could be pain in ass for AI factions.

  7. #7
    Ming the Merciless is my idol Senior Member Watchman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Helsinki, Finland
    Posts
    7,967

    Default Re: Supremacy at sea (not for fun)

    No. Just no. Unless you want the seas literally teeming with pirate fleets that is.
    "Let us remember that there are multiple theories of Intelligent Design. I and many others around the world are of the strong belief that the universe was created by a Flying Spaghetti Monster. --- Proof of the existence of the FSM, if needed, can be found in the recent uptick of global warming, earthquakes, hurricanes, and other natural disasters. Apparently His Pastaness is to be worshipped in full pirate regalia. The decline in worldwide pirate population over the past 200 years directly corresponds with the increase in global temperature. Here is a graph to illustrate the point."

    -Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster

  8. #8
    Not your friend Member General Appo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    As far away from you as possible. Scuzzbucket.
    Posts
    1,645

    Default Re: Supremacy at sea (not for fun)

    In my Sweboz campaign I actually had to use auto_win to get anywhere. Yes, had to! There were 6 fleets all with more then 5 ships in them roaming the Baltic Sea, and each of my ships costs a fortune plus the pirate ships are so much better I´d probably need 3 full stacks of ships just to take down a single one of the pirate fleets. I gave up and used auto_win after my 5th attempt to reach Gotland had failed, surely it can´t have been that hard?
    The Appomination

    I don't come here a lot any more. You know why? Because you suck. That's right, I'm talking to you. Your annoying attitude, bad grammar, illogical arguments, false beliefs and pathetic attempts at humour have driven me and many other nice people from this forum. You should feel ashamed. Report here at once to recieve your punishment. Scumbag.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO