Historically Inaccurate Movies

[CountArach]

300 was clearly stylistic, though. I don't think it should be first.

King Arthur should definitely be up there, though. Didn't the very movie make the claim it was telling the true story or something?

CR

Yes, I do recall something about that in the Intro.

[KarlXII]

Yes, I do recall something about that in the Intro.

It says how most historians agree that King Arthur was a Samartian cavalryman in the Roman Army, and he was left behind in Britain with his troop, or knights. I don't recall it saying it was the flat out truth.

[ICantSpellDawg]

It says how most historians agree that King Arthur was a Samartian cavalryman in the Roman Army, and he was left behind in Britain with his troop, or knights. I don't recall it saying it was the flat out truth.

I don't believe most historians are solid on whether or not he existed, much less that he came from the other end of Europe.