I would go even further. How can you understand history's decisive battles, from Gaugamela through Stalingrad, without insight into the nature of the opposing rulers, their nations, societies, religions or ideologies, etcetera.Originally Posted by Geoffrey S
Without knowledge of Ancient Greece and Persia you will never understand how the Phalanx came into being or why Alexander, leading a trusted cavalry unit of free Macedonians, achieved a tactical break-through against an army of slaves led by generals who were wary and demoralised because the Persian augurs had warned of bad omens in the days before battle.
As to Stalingrad, I recall a nice anecdote about Sartre's visit to the Soviet Union in 1954. Whilst being given the grand tour of Stalingrad rubble he was repeatedly overheard muttering to himself 'incredible, incredible'. Finally the tour guide turned to him and said: 'It's incredible how much the Germans destroyed, isn't it?' 'No, no!' Sartre retorted: 'It's incredible the Germans got this far!' And it is. If you want to understand why, you will have to study the politics behind that war as well.
Otherwise you might as well read a Smurf comic to deepen your understanding.
Bookmarks