Just keep at it Ed and don't worry about things like this. Actually creating them is where the tite spot is and you've done a great job at it.
Just keep at it Ed and don't worry about things like this. Actually creating them is where the tite spot is and you've done a great job at it.
YOU LOST AT CARRHAE? you los at at carrhae? all you need to do is kill Crassus' son-don't tell me you tried breaking through the square? (I won when I killed the son-then killed the father as a bonus-though you don't want to know how...Originally Posted by ombudsman
well good luck at Telamon!!
and them chariots were scary indeed-and the enemy attack was just this big human wave coming-took 20 minutes hard fighting to break them took 26% casualties (miraculously only 1 unit cracked-equites Gallorum-caught too early by asiatikoi hippeis. the other routed the other asiatikoi and hit the enemy in the back at the entrenchments-ending the fight there)
play Kynoskephalai as a roman for real challenge-that was friggin scary, almost lost the battle at one point (thank god for the Elephantes)
Areios is still fun as ever, have replayed Ebhernis (yet to win it anyhow)
I was once alive, but then a girl came and took out my ticker.
my 4 year old modding project--nearing completion: http://www.twcenter.net/forums/showthread.php?t=219506 (if you wanna help, join me).
tired of ridiculous trouble with walking animations? then you need my brand newmotion capture for the common man!
"We have proven, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that if we put the belonging to, in the I don't know what, all gas lines will explode" -alBernameg
Originally Posted by Ibrahim
yes, ´tis true, i lost at carrhaethe bugger ran away and hid in the square. and then i was kind of doing this =
my cats being the head and the wall being the romans, until i lost. but i guess ill have to try again. i am itching to try telamon though, just to prove that i can make it
![]()
Having only tried 2 battles (the Luso one and Ausculum) I have to say that so far they are great, especially the descriptions and the placing of the troops to start with. Are you still planning to make the series of battles based on the campaigns of Antiochus the great that were previewed? Although the 1.1 ones are more than enough to be going on with!
Last edited by Strategos Alexandros; 04-11-2008 at 18:42.
- my first balloon, from Mouzafphaerre
- LS balloon
Modo Egredior
https://www.perseus.tufts.edu/cgi-bi...ookup=Plb.+toc <- read this!
"Do you know what's worth fighting for?
When it's not worth dying for?"
Carrhae is more challenging when using Publius, since it ends if he gets killed.
I am glad people liked Zela, even tough I didnt spend that much time doing the battle.
You're right with your first comment, but I'm not entirely sure how you're trying to close your argument. Although, considering that they would be organized in the same manner as Roman troops it gives on the impression that they would be equipped similarly. Also, Rome's dominance over the peninsula by the Polybian period probably has a little to do with it too. Hence the reductionism you see.Originally Posted by QuintusSertorius
Okay, but again I don't see how this actually furthers what you're trying to get across. It's a limitation we need to deal with and so we compromise by using what would be the most probable equipment.Secondly, there was never anything like the picture-perfect matching gear we see in the RTW engine, not with most panoplies being heirlooms passed down through the generations and repaired, cannibalised and customised by each wearer. While there isn't a lot that can be done about that within the confines of the engine itself, the variation within units nominally recruited in the same place can only highlight the likelihood of variety between units from different places.
Okay, but not every allied troop would be drawn from just the Samnites or just the Bruttians. There would be allies from the north and the south. Again, limitations and we simply cannot justify giving another unit slot for allied hastati, principes, or triarii.Thirdly, have you looked at the Italian troop roster? It's not exactly wildly different to the Romans at all. Samnite Allied Medium Spearmen are very similar to Camillian Principes, and differ only in their main weapon to Polybian Hastati. Bruttian Infantry are pretty similar to Polybian Hastati and vary only in their main weapon to Camillian Principes. Samnite Heavy Infantry are a poor man's pedites extraordinarii. Campanian Cavalry were used extensively by Roman armies.
How we do numbers in battles depends on the battle itself, but if our impression is that the Italians would have fought as Roman units and that they would be drawn from all over Italy, what would be the point of including those very specific Italian tribe units?Lastly on the "numbers" issue, it really wouldn't be hard to reduce the number of hastati, principes and triarii and replace them with Italians. One battle had four each of the two former - easy switch right there.
The point? The beauty of variety and being able to make distinct the legion from the ala. The Italian peoples themselves certainly thought their heritage worthy of note, even when they were recruited, equipped and trained in the Roman manner. Such as Samnite legionaries painting their icons on their shields.
Furthermore, where are the pedites extraordinarii in any of those battle rosters?
Last edited by QuintusSertorius; 04-17-2008 at 23:13.
It began on seven hills - an EB 1.1 Romani AAR with historical house-rules (now ceased)
Heirs to Lysimachos - an EB 1.1 Epeiros-as-Pergamon AAR with semi-historical houserules (now ceased)
Philetairos' Gift - a second EB 1.1 Epeiros-as-Pergamon AAR
I agree in principle, but that isn't enough justification to include three extra units that are redundant.Originally Posted by QuintusSertorius
I haven't looked at the new battles closely. You would have to ask the guys who did the research.Furthermore, where are the pedites extraordinarii in any of those battle rosters?
The extraordinarii will be in the version of Magnesia I am working on. We don't know much about how they were deployed in the battle, but considering their march order I'm assuming they would be place at the far ends of the infantry in the first row between the hastati and equites.
I'll admit you've got me there. While it would be nice in a way to get "Italic hastati" et al, it is pretty redundant to have three extra units in the roster who differ only in having slightly different skins, since there's no evidence they were any better or worse than Romans were.Originally Posted by abou
My own inelegant solution is to continue using the Bruttians as "Italic hastati" (even if the real Bruttians were no longer recruited as such, there's little to separate them from Polybian hastati), then use pedites extraordinarii in place of "Italic principes", and forget about the "Italici triarii" because I never double them up with allied spearmen anyway. Stack is already too big without adding still more units to it.
Cool, look forward to seeing it.Originally Posted by abou
Last edited by QuintusSertorius; 04-17-2008 at 23:40.
It began on seven hills - an EB 1.1 Romani AAR with historical house-rules (now ceased)
Heirs to Lysimachos - an EB 1.1 Epeiros-as-Pergamon AAR with semi-historical houserules (now ceased)
Philetairos' Gift - a second EB 1.1 Epeiros-as-Pergamon AAR
Bookmarks