Page 17 of 51 FirstFirst ... 713141516171819202127 ... LastLast
Results 481 to 510 of 1508

Thread: 1.x AI Faction Progression Thread

  1. #481
    Βασιλευς και Αυτοκρατωρ Αρχης Member Centurio Nixalsverdrus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Γερμανια Ελευθερα
    Posts
    2,321

    Default AW: 1.1x AI Faction Progression Thread

    Some nice things there, penguinking. What armies do the Makedonians field in your campaign?

  2. #482
    Member Member penguinking's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    222

    Default Re: AW: 1.1x AI Faction Progression Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Centurio Nixalsverdrus View Post
    Some nice things there, penguinking. What armies do the Makedonians field in your campaign?
    I'm actually pretty happy with Makedon's armies. The average full stack is something like this:
    -3 units Makedonian reformed phalanx
    -4 units Thracian Light Spearmen
    -2 units elite phalanx
    -3 units classical hoplites
    -2 units companion cavalry or Thessalian heavy cavalry
    -1 unit elite peltasts
    -the rest are levies.
    They have something like 5 of those stacks in Scythia.

    The interesting thing is that the garrisons in Greece and Macedonia are almost entirely elite phalanx. The garrison is Demetria, the capitol, is 7 units of Argyraspides.
    Completed campaigns:
    Vanilla Carthage
    BI Sassanids
    EB 1.1 Casse

    "I don't intend for this to take on a political tone. I'm just here for the drugs."
    -Nancy Reagan at an anti-drug rally.

  3. #483
    Βασιλευς και Αυτοκρατωρ Αρχης Member Centurio Nixalsverdrus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Γερμανια Ελευθερα
    Posts
    2,321

    Default AW: 1.1x AI Faction Progression Thread

    Thx, that's not so bad at all.

  4. #484
    Not your friend Member General Appo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    As far away from you as possible. Scuzzbucket.
    Posts
    1,645

    Default Re: 1.1x AI Faction Progression Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by SwissBarbar View Post
    thats the saba, not the saka
    Ooops, I meant Saba. But still, since when does Gedrosia rebel to Saba? Or has it always done that?
    The Appomination

    I don't come here a lot any more. You know why? Because you suck. That's right, I'm talking to you. Your annoying attitude, bad grammar, illogical arguments, false beliefs and pathetic attempts at humour have driven me and many other nice people from this forum. You should feel ashamed. Report here at once to recieve your punishment. Scumbag.

  5. #485
    amrtaka Member machinor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Austria 'n Italy
    Posts
    464

    Default Re: 1.1x AI Faction Progression Thread

    You're right. In my Baktria campaigns Gedrosia usually rebels to Parthia.
    Quote Originally Posted by NickTheGreek View Post
    "Dahae always ride single file to hid their numbers, these tracks are side by side. And these arrow wounds, too accurate for Dahae, only Pahlavi Zradha Shivatir are so precise..."
    <-- My "From Basileion to Arche - A Makedonian AAR" Memorial Balloon.

  6. #486

    Default Re: 1.1x AI Faction Progression Thread

    sometimes the Sabeans do a naval invasion (if you're using BI), I fought a couple of stacks of cheap infantry back in my Pahlava game in 1.0
    ...at least put some spikes in your club for goodness sake!

  7. #487
    Symbasileus ton Rhomaioktonon Member Maion Maroneios's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Heraklion, Crete, Greece
    Posts
    2,610

    Default Re: 1.1x AI Faction Progression Thread

    Here is an edited map reflecting the AI expansion in my current Makedonian campaign. I haven't used FD at all yet, but I've been giving big amounts of mnai to the Eleutheroi and occasionally to the Parthians. The year is 258BC.

    Faction colors aren't the real ones, but you get the idea.

    Maion
    Last edited by Maion Maroneios; 11-01-2008 at 16:28.
    ~Maion

  8. #488

    Default Re: 1.1x AI Faction Progression Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Os-Q View Post
    sometimes the Sabeans do a naval invasion (if you're using BI), I fought a couple of stacks of cheap infantry back in my Pahlava game in 1.0
    There are other more trivial explanations, though:
    (a) A Saba diplomat with an itch passed by;
    (b) A wandering Saba armed expedition passed by and thought 'our new home!'. We've seen the Saba marching onto Persepolis before...
    - Tellos Athenaios
    CUF tool - XIDX - PACK tool - SD tool - EVT tool - EB Install Guide - How to track down loading CTD's - EB 1.1 Maps thread


    ὁ δ᾽ ἠλίθιος ὣσπερ πρόβατον βῆ βῆ λέγων βαδίζει” – Kratinos in Dionysalexandros.

  9. #489
    Not your friend Member General Appo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    As far away from you as possible. Scuzzbucket.
    Posts
    1,645

    Default Re: 1.1x AI Faction Progression Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Maion Maroneios View Post
    Here is an edited map reflecting the AI expansion in my current Makedonian campaign. I haven't used FD at all yet, but I've been giving big amounts of mnai to the Eleutheroi and occasionally to the Parthians. The year is 258BC.

    Faction colors aren't the real ones, but you get the idea.

    Maion

    Afraid I can´t see your pic. Btw, why do you use picoodle.
    The Appomination

    I don't come here a lot any more. You know why? Because you suck. That's right, I'm talking to you. Your annoying attitude, bad grammar, illogical arguments, false beliefs and pathetic attempts at humour have driven me and many other nice people from this forum. You should feel ashamed. Report here at once to recieve your punishment. Scumbag.

  10. #490
    Symbasileus ton Rhomaioktonon Member Maion Maroneios's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Heraklion, Crete, Greece
    Posts
    2,610

    Default Re: 1.1x AI Faction Progression Thread

    Well, why shouldn't I?

    Maion
    ~Maion

  11. #491
    Βασιλευς και Αυτοκρατωρ Αρχης Member Centurio Nixalsverdrus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Γερμανια Ελευθερα
    Posts
    2,321

    Default AW: Re: 1.1x AI Faction Progression Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by General Appo View Post
    Afraid I can´t see your pic.
    I can't see it either.

  12. #492
    Not your friend Member General Appo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    As far away from you as possible. Scuzzbucket.
    Posts
    1,645

    Default Re: 1.1x AI Faction Progression Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by General Appo View Post
    Afraid I can´t see your pic.
    Quote Originally Posted by Centurio Nixalsverdrus View Post
    I can't see it either.


    Quote Originally Posted by Maion Maroneios View Post
    Well, why shouldn't I?

    That´s why.
    The Appomination

    I don't come here a lot any more. You know why? Because you suck. That's right, I'm talking to you. Your annoying attitude, bad grammar, illogical arguments, false beliefs and pathetic attempts at humour have driven me and many other nice people from this forum. You should feel ashamed. Report here at once to recieve your punishment. Scumbag.

  13. #493

    Default Re: 1.1x AI Faction Progression Thread

    I can? ->
    - Tellos Athenaios
    CUF tool - XIDX - PACK tool - SD tool - EVT tool - EB Install Guide - How to track down loading CTD's - EB 1.1 Maps thread


    ὁ δ᾽ ἠλίθιος ὣσπερ πρόβατον βῆ βῆ λέγων βαδίζει” – Kratinos in Dionysalexandros.

  14. #494
    Symbasileus ton Rhomaioktonon Member Maion Maroneios's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Heraklion, Crete, Greece
    Posts
    2,610

    Default Re: 1.1x AI Faction Progression Thread

    Here, that's what I mean. I post every single pic of my AAR with picoodle and I got no problem...

    Maion
    ~Maion

  15. #495
    Member Member Lovejoy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    408

    Default Re: 1.1x AI Faction Progression Thread

    Bah!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Things are finaly looking better.

    I have FINALY, after maybe five stacks, a stronghold in Greece. Those Macs and and Epiros were touger than I thought. :P But now things are goin better. I once held both pella and the city under it, but lost them both before I could regroup in the south and receive lots of reinforcements.




    How it happened:

    After conquering Italy I concentrated on Greece.

    At first I was only meant to attack Epiros. So I build two armies, with heavy siege equipment and elephants, so they were quit expensive even though I had few elite units.

    I attacked Epiros homeland and all was well. When both cities where taken, one army marched north against the illyrian towns (owned by epiros), the other stayed.

    This is when the macs attacked and things went crazy.

    It became a two way war. My army that marched north was attacked by a strong epiros army of twice the size, I lost the battle and retreated to my boats. The army that was left in Epiros was attacked by a strong Mac army. But I won the battle, and decided to march against Pella (attack is the best defence lol:P).

    During the time I was shipping reinforcements to my army that lost in the north. And soon the army could continue against the epiros towns. But the epiros fought bravely and I took heavy casualties while only managing to to take one town(the one direcly north of epiros homeland). I tried to march against Pella to help my other army, but the general went sick. Slowing me alot. After many turns I got to the city NORTH of Pella, attacked it, got my general killed in the battled, but managed to take the city, only to get stuck there. My army was too small at this point to do anything.

    During the time my army who marched against Pella got in trouble. I was able to conquer Pella fairly easy. But two black stacks emerged. We fought, they won, I ran south, sacked the city north of Pella, continued south, captured Athen, got stuck there too.

    At this point in time I had managed to get the war machine goin, and armies where being produced everywhere. My italic cites, my Iberian towns and my African holdings, everyone contributed.

    But thanks to assassinations, lost fleets and battles, bad luck and tons of enemies, it isnt until now I feel I have a chance of winning.

    Most epic game ever :D
    Last edited by Lovejoy; 11-02-2008 at 03:50.

  16. #496
    Member Member Nobo's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    South of the Limes Germanicus
    Posts
    126

    Default Re: 1.1x AI Faction Progression Thread

    what year are you in?
    ____________


  17. #497
    Member Member Lovejoy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    408

    Default Re: 1.1x AI Faction Progression Thread

    239BC as carhago.

  18. #498
    Symbasileus ton Rhomaioktonon Member Maion Maroneios's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Heraklion, Crete, Greece
    Posts
    2,610

    Default Re: 1.1x AI Faction Progression Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Lovejoy View Post
    239BC as carhago.
    We kinda figured that last part :-P

    Maion
    ~Maion

  19. #499
    Member Member Ravenfeeder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Plymouth, UK
    Posts
    121

    Default Re: 1.1x AI Faction Progression Thread

    Continuing Kart-Hadast Game from #467 above

    210bc



    All Gallic gains against the Sweboz are courtesy of yours truly who sent an entirely Gallic force (mainly Nietos and Geasatae led by a Lesser King) against them.

    AS almost gone. Pontic expansion is great but they are at war with Maks and Ptolemaioi so I don't fancy their chances.

    Sapmi revolted from Hai to Sweboz control. Sabyn continue to be a thorn in the Pharoh's side.

  20. #500
    Member Member Lovejoy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    408

    Default Re: 1.1x AI Faction Progression Thread

    Epic expansions Ravenfeeder. Lets just hope Ptolemoi dont get to strong now.

    Any Casse invasion yet?

  21. #501
    Legatvs Member SwissBarbar's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Helvetia
    Posts
    1,905

    Default Re: 1.1x AI Faction Progression Thread



    Ravenfeeder , what did you do to get such an extraordinary AI expansion in the east?
    Balloon-Count: x 15


    Many thanks to Hooahguy for this great sig.

  22. #502
    Marzbân-î Jundîshâpûr Member The Persian Cataphract's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    3,170

    Default Re: 1.1x AI Faction Progression Thread

    Okay, this much has been established:

    * Pahlava has a great expansion routine which appears quite faithful to historicity.

    * Pontos does also seem quite capable of expanding quite well; sometimes they end up as far as the Bosphorus.

    * Sauromatae, from selected reports are aptly strong.

    * Hayasdan has fine expansion possibilities, but usually ends up in the northern steppes, which must be addressed.

    * Baktria seems aptly down-toned; still some traces of awkward expansion into the southern parts of Greater Iran, as far as Persis, but may be capable of properly expanding into India.

    * The Seleucids are literally sodomized... Some might think it's apt, but it should be a 50/50 outcome and not arbitrary. For instance they should be strong around Syria.

    * Ptolemaioi. The Yellow Fever. This may be the primary cause of the downfall of AS, and historically out of the two powers, it was actually the Ptolies who got the shorter end of the stick. They are clearly over-powered.

    Ideally all these factions should have some substance of reasonable proportion to them as far as the AI is concerned.


    "Fortunate is every man who in purity and truth recognizes valiance and prevents it from becoming bravado" - Âriôbarzanes of the Sûrên-Pahlavân

  23. #503
    Member Member Ravenfeeder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Plymouth, UK
    Posts
    121

    Default Re: 1.1x AI Faction Progression Thread

    @Lovejoy - No Casse invasion :(. Not that it would do much as Barbarian nations never build ships (I wish I knew why), so no reinforcements would happen.

    The Ptolemaioi have tried to take Lepki several times earlier in the game, but just saw their forces wiped out. They haven't tried again for the past decade - probably due to the 2 full stacks waiting for them. It is actually the Saba who've stopped their expansion - normally they go through Palmyra to get to Mesopotamia, but the Saba garrison there is huge, giving the Pahlava time to get there first.

    @SwissBarbar - the only extra modding is raising the value of Gold to 4 and lowering Silver to 2 making Large and Small Vein mines give different values (in standard EB the value of both is 3 and so the value of all mines is the same).

    @TPC - Your analysis is, as usual, correct. I wonder whether the Hai are actually trying to head for 'Rome' (Gotland) as they are one of the 'Roman' factions, but I'm not sure whether the actions of the other two 'Roman' factions bears that out. What happens if Eremos is made the province of 'Rome'?

    Baktria does attempt an Indian expansion, but always ends up with one of their armies stuck on the way to Opiana, not doing anything for the remainder of the game. This 'stuck stack' phenomenon happens to all factions, but hurts the small ones the most. However they can expand into AS regions easily as they share Regional MICs.

    The AS/Ptolemaioi balance is the most difficult to balance as they share both factional and regional MICs. The slighest change can swing the balance. AS does seem to prefer defending Margiana to Syria which is the reson that Pahlava find it so hard at least 50% of the time. Beefing up Pahlava in v1.1 has meant that they can take on AS in the East but that leaves AS too weakened elsewhere.

    [BI only] The other critical point between the two is often Kypros. If the AS take it then most of the time they will go on to dominate. I wonder whether it is too rich?

  24. #504

    Default Re: 1.1x AI Faction Progression Thread

    Well I wouldn't say that the Ptolies are overpowered. Its just that it seems that the AS ends up at war with all of their neighbors in 10 years or less. If a way could be found to keep them loyal for maybe even 5 years longer the AS could probably have a decent shot at holding them off. The fact that Carthage seems to not desire the Sand Wars anymore also seems to help the Ptolies. Even bringing a renewal of the Sand Wars would likely divert enough Ptolemaic attention to give the AS life. Personally I would like to see a situation where both slowly decline, but that is a personal preference admittedly since engaging one of the two superpowers is a task of slogging through endless phalanx stacks, which kills the game for me eventually. Unfortunately the main reason the Ptolies seem to win out is that they get to the triple-gold uber-general faster than the AS, and those they get will almost certainly be bunched in Anatolia and the Levant, whereas the AS will have any they get spread out over the various wars. If only a way to minimize the effect of a general on auto-calc could be found, it would probably alleviate many of the problems.
    I believe the Hai keep choosing the steppe b/c either the Sauro tend to leave their cities almost undefended by sending troops westwards to conquer or they believe the Sauro cities to be easier as they have the mix of infantry and HA whereas Sauro is plain ol' HA.
    On another AS note: if you play with FD and get the Syria/Levant/Anatolia area for yourself right after the Ptolies begin to conquer the AS core (i.e. before they Seleukia and Babylon), raze the military buildings of the territories you are going to give back to the Ptolies and leave the ones you will give back to the AS unscathed then the AS tends to be able to hold on. In fact, I actually had them sign a peace treaty that left the AS with the non-coastal part of Mesopotamia and the Ptolies with the coastal part (the Maks had conquered half of Anatolia and Pontus the other half by that time), at which point the AS began to crush their Eastern opponents one by one. So I really think that the AS/Ptolie war is very balanced stat-wise, just slightly in favor of the Ptolies, which in the end adds up to a Ptolie victory more often than not. So not a total nerfing but perhaps a modification of starting armies/wealth. For example, why do the AS start poor? Even with the dissent and all I would have figured the AS would still have a decent war chest available.
    I do like the Pontus/Pahlava expansions as well, though Pontus still tends to not build up their MICs in multple cities. I usually only see big MICs in Ankyra and Amaseia. Pahlava however seems to love to crank out the MICs.
    Balloons:
    From gamegeek2 for my awesome AI expansion -
    From machinor for 'splainin -

  25. #505
    Member Member penguinking's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    222

    Default Re: 1.1x AI Faction Progression Thread

    So far the AS almost always does fine in my campaigns. They take Tarsos and tend to expand a bit more in Asia Minor. I've yet to encounter a Yellow Death in four campaigns; they are always pretty inactive and really slowed down by Saba.

    I've also noticed that Macedon is frequently very strong. The KH may need some help. Saka seems to be doing better too.
    Last edited by penguinking; 11-03-2008 at 01:43.
    Completed campaigns:
    Vanilla Carthage
    BI Sassanids
    EB 1.1 Casse

    "I don't intend for this to take on a political tone. I'm just here for the drugs."
    -Nancy Reagan at an anti-drug rally.

  26. #506

    Default Re: 1.1x AI Faction Progression Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Ravenfeeder View Post
    @Lovejoy - No Casse invasion :(. Not that it would do much as Barbarian nations never build ships (I wish I knew why), so no reinforcements would happen.

    The Ptolemaioi have tried to take Lepki several times earlier in the game, but just saw their forces wiped out. They haven't tried again for the past decade - probably due to the 2 full stacks waiting for them. It is actually the Saba who've stopped their expansion - normally they go through Palmyra to get to Mesopotamia, but the Saba garrison there is huge, giving the Pahlava time to get there first.

    @SwissBarbar - the only extra modding is raising the value of Gold to 4 and lowering Silver to 2 making Large and Small Vein mines give different values (in standard EB the value of both is 3 and so the value of all mines is the same).

    @TPC - Your analysis is, as usual, correct. I wonder whether the Hai are actually trying to head for 'Rome' (Gotland) as they are one of the 'Roman' factions, but I'm not sure whether the actions of the other two 'Roman' factions bears that out. What happens if Eremos is made the province of 'Rome'?

    Baktria does attempt an Indian expansion, but always ends up with one of their armies stuck on the way to Opiana, not doing anything for the remainder of the game. This 'stuck stack' phenomenon happens to all factions, but hurts the small ones the most. However they can expand into AS regions easily as they share Regional MICs.

    The AS/Ptolemaioi balance is the most difficult to balance as they share both factional and regional MICs. The slighest change can swing the balance. AS does seem to prefer defending Margiana to Syria which is the reson that Pahlava find it so hard at least 50% of the time. Beefing up Pahlava in v1.1 has meant that they can take on AS in the East but that leaves AS too weakened elsewhere.

    [BI only] The other critical point between the two is often Kypros. If the AS take it then most of the time they will go on to dominate. I wonder whether it is too rich?
    Actually before I intervened Kypros changed hands several times before the Ptolies began the inexorable squeeze. In BI it seems to be a prime early AS target, when they are more than able of sparing the small stack needed to take it.
    I also noticed the Baktrian stuck stack but it finally unstuck and now Baktria is the proud owner of western India. And I never notice the Ptolies using Palmyra to get to Seleukia/Babylon. I always see them go the traditional route through Edessa. And I have noticed the Arveni build ships before, but not the Aedui/Casse/Sweboz/Luso. So I guess it can happen on occasion. And of course take into account which faction you use as the game tends to skew the performance of different factions based on who you are playing as. I am almost always a western power, like Rome. The one time I did a Pahlava campaign (pre-1.0 I think) the AS crushed the Ptolies. Since it was pre-1.0 I have no idea if they would do so again but I wonder if you played as Saka or Sauro if the AS would perform better.
    Last edited by LordCurlyton; 11-03-2008 at 01:53.
    Balloons:
    From gamegeek2 for my awesome AI expansion -
    From machinor for 'splainin -

  27. #507
    Member Member Ravenfeeder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Plymouth, UK
    Posts
    121

    Default Re: 1.1x AI Faction Progression Thread

    I should add that I'm playing H campaign difficulty. The extra money provided by VH will skew the results differently.

  28. #508
    Member Member Lovejoy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    408

    Default Re: 1.1x AI Faction Progression Thread

    Finaly Greece is secured:D + reform :DDDD



    Things are getting crazy in the east Hai has finaly waken, Selue is loosing ground in the east, Pahlava seem strong, Baktria is stuck, Saba is gaining ground, Pontos looked strong but are now loosing against Mac(Pergamon), Saka is CRAZY! and are still goin strong. Maybe they will reach Dacia :D

    And just to twist things up even more in the east I am about to mount the biggest invasion ever against Syria. The logistics are going to be troublesome. But oh heck. Thats the fun! :D

    EDIT: Anyone have an idea about what to do with KH, Rome and Epieros? I can kill them off if I want too, but I dont like to destroy factions... I was thinking about sending Eprios to India, but I couldnt bribe the towns over there :/
    Last edited by Lovejoy; 11-04-2008 at 04:24.

  29. #509

    Default Re: 1.1x AI Faction Progression Thread

    Send a diplomat to all the eastern factions and buy them some nice real-estate, then watch them bite the ASS up the AS.
    Do you find something funny with the name Biggus Dickus?

    in the EB PBeM

  30. #510

    Default Re: 1.1x AI Faction Progression Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Lovejoy View Post
    EDIT: Anyone have an idea about what to do with KH, Rome and Epieros? I can kill them off if I want too, but I dont like to destroy factions... I was thinking about sending Eprios to India, but I couldnt bribe the towns over there :/
    Send the Epirotes to Cyrene, and let them be a buffer between you and the ptolies.
    Likstrandens ormar som spyr blod och etter, Ni som blint trampar Draugs harg
    På knä I Eljudne mottag död mans dom, Mot död och helsvite, ert öde och pinoplats

Page 17 of 51 FirstFirst ... 713141516171819202127 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO