Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Dismounted Boyars Son Vs Dismounted Druzhina

  1. #1

    Default Dismounted Boyars Son Vs Dismounted Druzhina

    OK this two units you can get as russia...only problem is the arer mostly the same with minute differences in shield i think, attack is the same...recrutment cost is pretty much the same think a little difference of 20 30 florins....


    So is it a choice of fashion?? Choose the most hardcore looking axe wielding vodka drinking, son of the Volga??? i can't seem to decide which are better...
    My deepest fear is not that I am inadequate...my deepest fear is that I am powerful beyond measure.

  2. #2
    Nolan Bushnell Cultist Member ataribaby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    England
    Posts
    118

    Default Re: Dismounted Boyars Son Vs Dismounted Druzhina

    They're identical as far as I can see except in the way they look. It's a bit odd and a bit sad - a missed opportunity perhaps to add a bit of variety to the Russians' heavy infantry.

    There are other factions where there are pairs of identical units with different names. The French have Noble Knights and Chivalric Knights, the English have Spear Militia and Levy Spearmen, etc.

    It really boils down to availability. Once you get a fortress you get a small recruitment pool of Dimounted Boyar Sons, and it's not until you improve your barracks that you get the other unit and can then spam heavy infantry.
    Last edited by ataribaby; 04-08-2008 at 06:16.

  3. #3

    Default Re: Dismounted Boyars Son Vs Dismounted Druzhina

    A bit off topic, but here it goes.

    This is what I've been wondering for a long time. Do people generally prefer typical axemen (i.e. Russian ones, maybe Venetian Heavy Infantry...) over their more Knightly counterparts without armour piercing capabilities? I find axemen ultimately more interesting and all-round useful, even if they maybe can't take charges quite as well as foot knights (not sure, as my foot knights aren't on the receiving end usually).

    When playing as Russia, I personally like to use an axe line supported with a lot of missile troops. I usually don't use lots of heavy infantry with other factions, they usually just strike key points or function as reinforcements while cavalry and missiles rake in the kills.

    Early on it's mostly 1/2-2/3 -strength horse archer stacks, which never lose their usefulness anyway.

  4. #4
    Nolan Bushnell Cultist Member ataribaby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    England
    Posts
    118

    Default Re: Dismounted Boyars Son Vs Dismounted Druzhina

    Quote Originally Posted by Caliburn
    Do people generally prefer typical axemen (i.e. Russian ones, maybe Venetian Heavy Infantry...) over their more Knightly counterparts without armour piercing capabilities?
    I've often wondered the same. I mean it's a bit of a no-brainer: why bother with swords when there are axes, maces and hammers that halve the value of armour? Venetian Heavies rock.

  5. #5
    Senior Member Senior Member Quintus.JC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,572

    Default Re: Dismounted Boyars Son Vs Dismounted Druzhina

    They do have the exact same stats, even morale and cost. That is just sad.

    I've often wondered the same. I mean it's a bit of a no-brainer: why bother with swords when there are axes, maces and hammers that halve the value of armour? Venetian Heavies rock.
    Dismounted English Knights are absolutely pure class. Undoubtly one of the best infantry in the game.
    Last edited by Quintus.JC; 04-08-2008 at 15:07.

  6. #6
    Voluntary Suspension Voluntary Suspension Philippus Flavius Homovallumus's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Isca
    Posts
    13,477

    Default Re: Dismounted Boyars Son Vs Dismounted Druzhina

    I think the point is to draw your infantry from two pools, rather than one. Theoretically that doubles your recruitment pool and regeneration if you develope both lines. Same with French Cav.
    "If it wears trousers generally I don't pay attention."

    [IMG]https://img197.imageshack.us/img197/4917/logoromans23pd.jpg[/IMG]

  7. #7

    Default Re: Dismounted Boyars Son Vs Dismounted Druzhina

    My favourite faction for infantry is
    Scotland
    because you can recruit highland nobles who are only 90 florins more than the shield and AXE regular highlanders and they will quickly give you Swordsmith Guild.
    Especially i've noticed that Highlander (axe / buckler shield) can stand their ground against DFK even, and when I play as Scotland i end up with many many highlander and highland noble units that i retrain and keep at Silver Chevrons sometimes up to Gold.

  8. #8

    Default Re: Dismounted Boyars Son Vs Dismounted Druzhina

    Such has also been my experience with the Scottish infantry. They remain effective even into the Timurid invasion period. Once the highland noble swords get to silver chevrons with weapon and armor upgrade they are extremely effective and even more importantly - frugal.

  9. #9
    Senior Member Senior Member Cheetah's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Hungary
    Posts
    2,085

    Default Re: Dismounted Boyars Son Vs Dismounted Druzhina

    Boyar sons have free upkeep while dzurinja has not. So if you wish to strenghten yur defences then boyar sons all the way. For an offensive army it is the same, but with the amazing variety of shooters and cavs available for the russians you dont need axemen in an open battle. I take two of them though for each army for sieges.
    Lional of Cornwall
    proud member of the Round Table Knights
    ___________________________________
    Death before dishonour.

    "If you wish to weaken the enemy's sword, move first, fly in and cut!" - Ueshiba Morihei O-Sensei

  10. #10

    Default Re: Dismounted Boyars Son Vs Dismounted Druzhina

    Quote Originally Posted by Cheetah
    Boyar sons have free upkeep while dzurinja has not. So if you wish to strenghten yur defences then boyar sons all the way. For an offensive army it is the same, but with the amazing variety of shooters and cavs available for the russians you dont need axemen in an open battle. I take two of them though for each army for sieges.
    Free upkeep didn't even notice that thx for the info
    My deepest fear is not that I am inadequate...my deepest fear is that I am powerful beyond measure.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO