Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: Is historical discussion of Roman equipment off limits?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Muckomania or the Muckster Member mucky305's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Located at the Bottom of a Lake, Right next to that Chick with the Sword
    Posts
    124

    Default Is historical discussion of Roman equipment off limits?

    Is historical discussion of roman equipment off limits here as those threads tend to turn into "why isn't such and such in EB"? Just want to check before I start one.


    - Drink the Kool-Aid
    'Anonymous'

  2. #2
    Guitar God Member Mediolanicus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    On the banks of the Scaldis.
    Posts
    1,355

    Default Re: Is historical discussion of Roman equipment off limits?

    Nothing is off limits here.

    Just be warned that most, if not all, EB members are tired of saying that the lorica segmenta armour isn't in the game because it was used in the 1st century AD at the earliest - according to archeological finds - and thus outside of the game's timeframe.
    Last edited by Mediolanicus; 04-16-2008 at 17:33.
    __________________

    --> - Never near Argos - <--

  3. #3
    EBII Hod Carrier Member QuintusSertorius's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    23,497

    Default Re: Is historical discussion of Roman equipment off limits?

    Quote Originally Posted by Mediolanicus
    Nothing is off limits here.

    Just be warned that most, if not all, EB members are tired of saying that the lorica segmenta armour isn't in the game because it was used in the 1st century AD at the earliest - according to archeological finds - and thus outside of the game's timeframe.
    Not only that, but it co-existed with the lorica hamata, and was eventually phased out because the latter was cheaper and already in massive supply.
    Last edited by QuintusSertorius; 04-16-2008 at 19:21.
    It began on seven hills - an EB 1.1 Romani AAR with historical house-rules (now ceased)
    Heirs to Lysimachos - an EB 1.1 Epeiros-as-Pergamon AAR with semi-historical houserules (now ceased)
    Philetairos' Gift - a second EB 1.1 Epeiros-as-Pergamon AAR


  4. #4
    NOBAΛO AYΣE Member Ayce's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    București, România
    Posts
    442

    Default Re: Is historical discussion of Roman equipment off limits?

    No, it's not off limits, I think you just saw the joke LS threads.

  5. #5
    Muckomania or the Muckster Member mucky305's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Located at the Bottom of a Lake, Right next to that Chick with the Sword
    Posts
    124

    Default Re: Is historical discussion of Roman equipment off limits?

    Thanks! I just didn't want to get in any flame war. The way I see it, I wouldn't complain about LS not being in the game even if it was historically accurate (I know it isn't) because:

    1. EB is FREE!
    2. It's great fun to play with tons of great content and well...I didn't pay anything for it aka it's FREE!
    3. The EB team could put pink bunnies with Interceptor body armor and M240 machine guns (it's there mod anyway) and I wouldn't care because I would just not install the mod and even if I did, I didn't pay anything for it.

    Thanks again!


    - Drink the Kool-Aid
    'Anonymous'

  6. #6
    EB TRIBVNVS PLEBIS Member MarcusAureliusAntoninus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    The State of Jefferson, USA
    Posts
    5,722

    Default Re: Is historical discussion of Roman equipment off limits?

    Any discussion is fine.

    The things that annoy the team are when someone brings something up, the team says it won't be in the game (for whatever reasons), and the person just won't drop it.

    It is also annoying when someone says something like, "X equiptment is wrong. Change it now." When pointing out any mistake by anyone (real or perceived) it is never wise to offend the person. An attack automatically forces the responder to be defensive.


  7. #7

    Default Re: Is historical discussion of Roman equipment off limits?

    Speaking of discussions of Roman equipment...

    What are the odds that in EB2 we could see a faction that are alien invaders with super armor and heat-ray weapons and three legged robot tanks... but germs on Earth kill them quickly so to win a battle you have to rout the enemy in like 30 seconds or else all your soldiers die?

    It's totally a unique concept and in no way is transporting a rather campy scifi novel written in 1898 into a setting of antiquity...
    "I could be bounded in a nutshell, and count myself a king of infinite space, were it not that I have bad dreams." -Hamlet, II, ii

    "Historians and others attempt to pin the tail on the reluctant monkey of change." -excerpt from a real college essay, from Ignorance is Blitz by Anders Henriksson

  8. #8
    Member Member Centurion Crastinus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Beaufort, South Carolina, USA
    Posts
    249

    Default Re: Is historical discussion of Roman equipment off limits?

    I have always wondered if Lorica Hamata and Lorica Segmentata could have been used at the same time in the same legion.

  9. #9

    Default Re: Is historical discussion of Roman equipment off limits?

    Quote Originally Posted by Dhampir
    Speaking of discussions of Roman equipment...

    What are the odds that in EB2 we could see a faction that are alien invaders with super armor and heat-ray weapons and three legged robot tanks... but germs on Earth kill them quickly so to win a battle you have to rout the enemy in like 30 seconds or else all your soldiers die?
    Only if the aliens wear Lorica Segmentata.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO