I agree with you, but wouldn't that mean that the definition by Fischl doesn't apply in this case? (look at the bolded fragment)Originally Posted by Adrian II
I agree with you, but wouldn't that mean that the definition by Fischl doesn't apply in this case? (look at the bolded fragment)Originally Posted by Adrian II
It is art commenting on itself!
That has become a genuine function of art in modern times, at least since the surrealists. This is a perfect example (bravo!) of an image that to the untrained eye looks like a fairly decent pipe advert, whereas if you followed developments in art in Magritte's time it was immediately obvious that this was a funny comment on faux realism.
Born On The Flames
Bookmarks