Will EB2 feature some Tibetan Mercenaries ?

**Barry Soteiro** · 04-19-2008, 23:16

As a very rare merceanry unit with very low spawning rates ?

**DaCrAzYmOfO** · 04-19-2008, 23:18

Go to the EB 2 forum, and man you are asking tons of questions today lol

**MarcusAureliusAntoninus** · 04-19-2008, 23:24

Tibet really isn't on the map (maybe the edge), and it did not have a large population at the time.

Plus, EB doesn't add units just because they would be cool or such. Find some historical evidence that the Tibetans left Tibet and went west looking for jobs as military mercenaries, then find out how they fought. Do this and the EB team will make a Tibetan mercenary if they trump all other units that deserve faction slots.

**Barry Soteiro** · 04-19-2008, 23:27

Maybe Xiongnu mercnearies ?

**Tellos Athenaios** · 04-20-2008, 03:44

Even less likely. There's the Yuezhi between the EB map and the Xiognu; and at the game's start both of these people do not even have any of their 'powerbases' close by. (The closest thing is the IIRC sort of vassal state represented by Sulek, which is subject to the Yuezhi: not the Xiognu.)

**russia almighty** · 04-20-2008, 06:12

Will the EB team feature a dropping of the ban hammer tonight?

**blitzkrieg80** · 04-20-2008, 06:38

Tibetans, why not Proto-Turks? just because the Olympics is coming up, jump on the trendy-train? leave out even more important peoples (concerning world history)?

**abou** · 04-20-2008, 07:10

Originally Posted by russia almighty

Will the EB team feature a dropping of the ban hammer tonight?

I would be lying if I said that it hasn't been brought up.

**russia almighty** · 04-20-2008, 07:15

Pass it on that I will fire up the ovens for a special batch if it happens.

Cause, what we've been living on is a few months old stash. Thats right, they're still good, even if they're old.