A New EB Tavern

[Ibrahim]

turd sandwich for president 2004! that's rich. vote or die mother-#@&$&er!

any ways, that reminds me of a opinion paper i wrote for honors government, that was to comment on the democratic convention in Texas. put it this way: if it was meant to be a college style essay (rather than just an opinion), I would have flunked it, because of how admittedly rude and sarcastic I was.... teacher found it to be accurate though, so I got an A (though he later told me that I need to cut down on how biting I was)

now to find it...
EDIT: here are some excerpts:
"The new chairman took to the stand, and gave his thanks, babbling on about how he vowed not to repeat the 2000 election, and thus have a good nghts sleep. then th most senior member also spoke. load of A@#-she kept saying that we must elect official because they must elevate the democratic party-notice no mention of country. Non of them did-at least that I heard...then it was on to the main event.."

"Williams (the chairman) said that 10 resolutions were proposed for deliberation, and then began to read out the rules: title were to be read, then the resolutions voted on. He was immediately assailed by the others, who demanded that the full rules be read, all 2 pages per resolution average. the motion was nominated (why nominated I have no clue-just vote for it) and approved. Then several poeple to the left side of the room, apparently a group of Hicks, spoke out, demanding a resolution to simpify the resolution-at which a group of more democrats retorted, saying, that they needed to pass a resolution that banned poeple from voting who can't get the English used..."

"resolution 2: reforming the the nomination process, whereby the Caucus and convension would be scrapped. this caused an uproar. One man, a ruddy person standing to the right-center of the room, spoke for it. Mr Lang and an old rickety lady spoke out against it. the old lady was particularily vocal."

"resolution 4: use of the winner take all system: 1/2 the assembly asked it be dropped, saying it was like the caucus dropping, but that turned out to be incorrect (duh?). After a short, sharp debate (again ruddy guy vs. Rickety lady), it was shot down..."

in the statistics epilogue: "many were poorly, or plainly dressed, sme even looked like street urchins or bums, sporting unkept beards and hair. Many were clearly uneducated, idealistic, or just plain not republican. The meeting was disorganized, and it was hard to listen to anything they said." also: "4-Opinianation: too high... many were argumentative, over emotional, or just plain F%$&*ing stupid-looked like a congregation of southern bptist ministers orr snake handlers or something of that order. 5-Party discipline: they have discipline?"