Results 1 to 30 of 38

Thread: What did Vanilla get right?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default Re: What did Vanilla get right?

    We people here surfing forums, downloading mods and discussing historical accuracy are not the average buyers. You'll always find lots of people who want a game more complex, more historically accurate, more challenging, but those who pay the company its money (in numerical relation) don't want that. They are satisfied with a bit of everything and a portion of "cool" stuff like shining LS armour, war dogs and different roman families. There probably never will be a game which has no "need" for modding, not because the developers suck, but because they do the game for those they can earn money with.
    Game play is a two edged sword.
    Last edited by Lysimachos; 04-28-2008 at 16:41.
    Read about glory and decline of the Seleucid Empire... (EB 1.1 AAR)

    from Satalexton from I of the Storm from Vasiliyi

  2. #2
    The Creator of Stories Member Parallel Pain's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Sitting on the Throne of My Empires
    Posts
    380

    Default Re: What did Vanilla get right?

    The original Shogun doesn't really need modding

  3. #3

    Default Re: What did Vanilla get right?

    They got the engine right, it might be full of stupid hardcodes and mod-unfriendly scripting, but you know what? Its a great engine that, while not used to its full potential , is still (In my humble Opinion) one of the better Strat-game engines.


    Also, the senate system(albeit historically innacurate-ish and exclusive to Romans for some reason) is something that for some reason, I liked.
    Last edited by Olaf The Great; 04-28-2008 at 21:22.
    [COLOR="Black"]Jesus's real name was Inuyasha Yashua!
    Any computer made after 1985 has the storage capacity to house an evil spirit.
    Quote Originally Posted by Fluvius Camillus View Post
    What I'm showing here is that it doesn't matter how well trained or brave you are, no one can resist an elephant charge in the rear

    ~Fluvius

  4. #4
    Member Member Taneda Santôka's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Begging around...
    Posts
    144

    Default Re: What did Vanilla get right?

    Quote Originally Posted by Parallel Pain
    The original Shogun doesn't really need modding


    It couldnt get any, but it had battlefield ninjas, blacksuited ninjas, legendary geishas, kensais, 7 clans among the dozens actually important, Imagawa in Kyushu, Takeda in southern Honshu, only peasant ashigarus and it did have a full mongol invaion... But again it's the best TW so far, with the ilustrations, music and japanese battle formations!

  5. #5
    Symbasileus ton Rhomaioktonon Member Maion Maroneios's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Heraklion, Crete, Greece
    Posts
    2,610

    Default Re: What did Vanilla get right?

    I will have to agree with those who say vanilla was not intended to be 100% accurate historically, just provide players with a game they'll have fun with. And I certainly did, before I came across RTW modifications. You know, there are sometimes I just feel like playing good old vanilla again, only to shake my head in dissapointment and play EB with more passion again...
    Last edited by Maion Maroneios; 04-29-2008 at 16:55.
    ~Maion

  6. #6
    Stranger in a strange land Moderator Hooahguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    The Fortress
    Posts
    11,852

    Default Re: What did Vanilla get right?

    lol. i thought that too. when i had to re-install all my games b/c i lost my hard drive, i played one battle in RTW. i had 6 units of phalanxmen, and they had a bunch of infantry. i routed them with one loss of my own....
    i began to cry, not believing at how easy it was to kill them, and i didnt play again untiol i had EB safely installed.

    to the OP- nothing!!!!!!!
    jk lol
    On the Path to the Streets of Gold: a Suebi AAR
    Visited:
    A man who casts no shadow has no soul.
    Hvil i fred HoreTore

  7. #7
    Member Member Primative1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Wales, UK
    Posts
    85

    Default Re: What did Vanilla get right?

    I dont own a copy anymore but have heard that it is impossible to play Shogun on XP.

    Is there a patch/fix available for it?
    '.....I should like to see the last king strangled with the guts of the last priest.'

  8. #8

    Default Re: What did Vanilla get right?

    Quote Originally Posted by Primative1
    I dont own a copy anymore but have heard that it is impossible to play Shogun on XP.

    Is there a patch/fix available for it?
    Perhaps with an emulator. Med 1 works fine on XP, by the way.
    Read about glory and decline of the Seleucid Empire... (EB 1.1 AAR)

    from Satalexton from I of the Storm from Vasiliyi

  9. #9
    Wannabe Member The General's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Winland.
    Posts
    484

    Default Re: What did Vanilla get right?

    Quote Originally Posted by Primative1
    I dont own a copy anymore but have heard that it is impossible to play Shogun on XP.

    Is there a patch/fix available for it?
    It doesn't work for me, crashes at the end of the first AI turn. >_>

    *Is furious*

    Gief working Shogun.
    I has two balloons!

  10. #10
    fancy assault unit Member blank's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Tallinn, Estonia
    Posts
    1,273

    Default Re: What did Vanilla get right?

    Quote Originally Posted by Lysimachos
    We people here surfing forums, downloading mods and discussing historical accuracy are not the average buyers. You'll always find lots of people who want a game more complex, more historically accurate, more challenging, but those who pay the company its money (in numerical relation) don't want that. They are satisfied with a bit of everything and a portion of "cool" stuff like shining LS armour, war dogs and different roman families. There probably never will be a game which has no "need" for modding, not because the developers suck, but because they do the game for those they can earn money with.
    Game play is a two edged sword.
    I honestly doubt CA would have lost any money if they'd made vanilla RTW like EB. IMO EB is a lot easier to get into then some other strategy games *cough*all Paradox games*cough*.

    I think the main reason CA didn't go the "EB way" is because it would've taken an excessive amount of time, and since they're a company after all, they need to make as much money in as little time as possible



    edit: a path to the dark side spammage is, young padawan
    Last edited by blank; 04-29-2008 at 23:12.
    Quote Originally Posted by Skullheadhq View Post
    Now I can even store my dick in EB underwear

  11. #11
    theweak-themighty-the CRAZIII Member craziii's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    nyc
    Posts
    172

    Default Re: What did Vanilla get right?

    what vanilla rtw did right was that battle field is determined by where the 2 opposing armies meet on the campaign map. that is the single most impressive thing ever! that 3D map is the biggest improvement over the original province 2d blocks of the old, even though, it is also the cause of bad diplomacy in the game.

  12. #12
    Ambassador of Bartix Member Tiberius Nero's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Isca Dumnoniorum
    Posts
    328

    Default Re: What did Vanilla get right?

    I think the risk style map of STW and MTW was much better for the AI than the continuous map of RTW, at least then it could concentrate its armies.
    Wow, got 3 ballons in one fell swoop

  13. #13
    EB annoying hornet Member bovi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    11,796

    Default Re: What did Vanilla get right?

    Quote Originally Posted by blank
    I honestly doubt CA would have lost any money if they'd made vanilla RTW like EB.

    I think the main reason CA didn't go the "EB way" is because it would've taken an excessive amount of time
    These two statements are contradictory, or more precisely the second one kills the first.

    Having problems getting EB2 to run? Try these solutions.
    ================
    I do NOT answer PM requests for help with EB. Ask in a new help thread in the tech help forum.
    ================
    I think computer viruses should count as life. I think it says something about human nature that the only form of life we have created so far is purely destructive. We've created life in our own image. - Stephen Hawking

  14. #14

    Default Re: What did Vanilla get right?

    Quote Originally Posted by bovi
    These two statements are contradictory, or more precisely the second one kills the first.
    I second to that.
    - REVENGE!!!
    - A NEW DYNASTY!!!

    - a very generous bribe from Yarema


  15. #15
    fancy assault unit Member blank's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Tallinn, Estonia
    Posts
    1,273

    Default Re: What did Vanilla get right?

    Quote Originally Posted by bovi
    These two statements are contradictory, or more precisely the second one kills the first.
    No, actually they're not.

    What i meant was that CA would've sold roughly the same amount of units if they'd put more work in

    Quote Originally Posted by Skullheadhq View Post
    Now I can even store my dick in EB underwear

  16. #16

    Default Re: What did Vanilla get right?

    RTW is the first computer game I've known to even MENTION Seleucids and Thracians, as well as to include Antigonid Macedonians. Having always had an appetite for the old world, and especially the world of the Diadochi, I always hated how games always went:

    Persian Wars -> Peloponessian Wars -> Alexander the Great -> Rome/Caesar...

    To actually see a game, which acknowledges the existence of minor states like Pontus, or where Hellenistic states weren't merely cannon-fodder for the Romans but rather a cultures in their own right

    I just loved it,,,

    But I always hate being at the edge of the map, cos it feels so unrealistic with secure borders there. Thats why I love EB, since then my Seleucids are no longer unrealistically isolated in a corner of the map. EB thus fulfills my dreams. Had I loved the Saka, EB would have irritated me just as much, since they live in this unrealistic corner ;) Until computers get good enough to feature the entire of Eurasia, that'll prolly always be the case. But with EB all my favourite factions are now completely in their own, beautiful surroundings. Lots of thanks !
    Moreover, I advise that Syracusans must be added to EB (insp. by Cato the Elder )

    Is looking forward to the 2090's, when EB 20.0 will be released - spanning the entire Eurasian continent and having no Eleutheroi - with a faction for every independent state instead. Look out for the Gedrosians, the Cretans and the kingdom of Kallatis!

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO