Results 1 to 20 of 20

Thread: Later Polybian armies

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    EB TRIBVNVS PLEBIS Member MarcusAureliusAntoninus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    The State of Jefferson, USA
    Posts
    5,722

    Default Re: Later Polybian armies

    Since many of the Italian allies fought with the same types of equiptment, tactics, and training as "Roman" units, in EB the Hastati, Principes, and Triarii available outside of Roma actually represent allies as well. They could have their own units with different skins, but that would take up more unit slots so EB decided to represent allies that fought the same a Romans with the same unit. If their were unlimited unit spaces I'm possitive that EB would already have variation amongst the Italian allies, but we are stuck in the engine...


  2. #2
    EBII Hod Carrier Member QuintusSertorius's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    23,421

    Default Re: Later Polybian armies

    Quote Originally Posted by Reno Melitensis
    To create an accurate Roman legion we need someone to make an EB Roman mini mod, as has been done to RTR Platinum. Maybe the Camillan reforms should be scraped and more Italian infantry units introduced, to simulate the different Italian and Latin Hastati, Principe and Triari.

    Like many of you I try to diversify as much as I can my legions by adding Exraordinarii, Samniti Milites and Hastati, Bruttians and Lucanian infantry, and the Hoplites , with my Camillan or Polybian Legions.

    What we need is an Eb mini mod.
    Cheers.
    The only way you could free up space in the Roman roster would be to remove the Camillian troops - that's six slots right away.

    Quote Originally Posted by MarcusAureliusAntoninus
    Since many of the Italian allies fought with the same types of equiptment, tactics, and training as "Roman" units, in EB the Hastati, Principes, and Triarii available outside of Roma actually represent allies as well. They could have their own units with different skins, but that would take up more unit slots so EB decided to represent allies that fought the same a Romans with the same unit. If their were unlimited unit spaces I'm possitive that EB would already have variation amongst the Italian allies, but we are stuck in the engine...

    Indeed, the old unit limitation. But as I said in the OP, I'm not disputing that, I'm just after ideas on what units I could use to get around that.
    Last edited by QuintusSertorius; 04-28-2008 at 23:50.
    It began on seven hills - an EB 1.1 Romani AAR with historical house-rules (now ceased)
    Heirs to Lysimachos - an EB 1.1 Epeiros-as-Pergamon AAR with semi-historical houserules (now ceased)
    Philetairos' Gift - a second EB 1.1 Epeiros-as-Pergamon AAR


  3. #3
    EB TRIBVNVS PLEBIS Member MarcusAureliusAntoninus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    The State of Jefferson, USA
    Posts
    5,722

    Default Re: Later Polybian armies

    Maybe you could encourage someone to make a minimod that adds allied italian hastati, principes, triarii from another mod (with permission) as well as other italian regionals? There really isn't anything that can be used as allied Italians in EB...


  4. #4

    Default Re: Later Polybian armies

    Quote Originally Posted by QuintusSertorius
    Indeed, the old unit limitation.
    If i understood correctly what has been said in another thread there still are some unit slots left. The team just didn't want to fill them because the unit limit in M2TW is the same for a greater number of factions and they wouldn't want to leave units out which were in EB 1. If that is right, it should be no problem to add a handful of units to your personal modification.

    Edit: When using ALX there shouldn't be a problem at all, as it has a higher unit limit.
    Last edited by Lysimachos; 04-29-2008 at 09:33.
    Read about glory and decline of the Seleucid Empire... (EB 1.1 AAR)

    from Satalexton from I of the Storm from Vasiliyi

  5. #5
    EBII Hod Carrier Member QuintusSertorius's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    23,421

    Default Re: Later Polybian armies

    Quote Originally Posted by Lysimachos
    If i understood correctly what has been said in another thread there still are some unit slots left. The team just didn't want to fill them because the unit limit in M2TW is the same for a greater number of factions and they wouldn't want to leave units out which were in EB 1. If that is right, it should be no problem to add a handful of units to your personal modification.
    Weren't there buggy issues if you started filling up the roster? How many slots are left for the Romans?
    It began on seven hills - an EB 1.1 Romani AAR with historical house-rules (now ceased)
    Heirs to Lysimachos - an EB 1.1 Epeiros-as-Pergamon AAR with semi-historical houserules (now ceased)
    Philetairos' Gift - a second EB 1.1 Epeiros-as-Pergamon AAR


  6. #6

    Default Re: Later Polybian armies

    My solution to the Latin allies problem is to pretend that Rorarii are Italian light infantry (Hastati equivalent).

    Then Bruttian infantry can be used as Principes equivalents, and Samnite Heavy Infanty as Triarii equivalents.

    From what I can figure out, Rorarii were deployed behind the Triarii in combat. Since 'going to the Triarii' wasn't a regular occurrence in Roman battles, the Rorarii must have been used even less often. Most likely they were the camp guard and hardly ever got into the action.

    So I don't regret 'losing' the Rorarii from the Roman legion and giving them to the Italians.

  7. #7
    EBII Hod Carrier Member QuintusSertorius's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    23,421

    Default Re: Later Polybian armies

    Quote Originally Posted by Titus Marcellus Scato
    My solution to the Latin allies problem is to pretend that Rorarii are Italian light infantry (Hastati equivalent).

    Then Bruttian infantry can be used as Principes equivalents, and Samnite Heavy Infanty as Triarii equivalents.

    From what I can figure out, Rorarii were deployed behind the Triarii in combat. Since 'going to the Triarii' wasn't a regular occurrence in Roman battles, the Rorarii must have been used even less often. Most likely they were the camp guard and hardly ever got into the action.

    So I don't regret 'losing' the Rorarii from the Roman legion and giving them to the Italians.
    Problem there, aside from rorarii lacking the right equipment is that you can't recruit them after you've had the Polybian reforms. Rorarii, if they were still available make a good representation of volones - camp slaves who were occasionally armed.

    Are there any old skins for Roman troops that could be re-used as Italic Polybians?
    It began on seven hills - an EB 1.1 Romani AAR with historical house-rules (now ceased)
    Heirs to Lysimachos - an EB 1.1 Epeiros-as-Pergamon AAR with semi-historical houserules (now ceased)
    Philetairos' Gift - a second EB 1.1 Epeiros-as-Pergamon AAR


  8. #8
    EB2 Baseless Conjecturer Member blacksnail's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    3,074

    Default Re: Later Polybian armies

    I believe there are roughly 40 slots free in EB1 for you to play with.

  9. #9

    Default Re: Later Polybian armies

    Quote Originally Posted by QuintusSertorius
    Problem there, aside from rorarii lacking the right equipment is that you can't recruit them after you've had the Polybian reforms. Rorarii, if they were still available make a good representation of volones - camp slaves who were occasionally armed.

    Are there any old skins for Roman troops that could be re-used as Italic Polybians?
    Sorry, I missed the Polybian part of your post. I was talking about Camillian.

  10. #10
    Whatever Member konny's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Germania Inferior
    Posts
    1,787

    Default Re: Later Polybian armies

    Quote Originally Posted by QuintusSertorius
    The only way you could free up space in the Roman roster would be to remove the Camillian troops - that's six slots right away.
    If you are going to delete Roman units to make room for early allied units, you should consider to drop the Imperial line-up what you won't see in most of your Roman campaigns (seriously, who plays beyond Marian times?). The Camillans are needed because the army of the Pyrrhic War was not the same as the one of the Second Punic War.

    Disclaimer: my posts are to be considered my private opinion and not offical statements by the EB Team

  11. #11
    EBII Hod Carrier Member QuintusSertorius's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    23,421

    Default Re: Later Polybian armies

    Quote Originally Posted by konny
    If you are going to delete Roman units to make room for early allied units, you should consider to drop the Imperial line-up what you won't see in most of your Roman campaigns (seriously, who plays beyond Marian times?). The Camillans are needed because the army of the Pyrrhic War was not the same as the one of the Second Punic War.
    As it turns out, from what blacksnail said there's room anyway, so there's no need to be deleting anyone.
    It began on seven hills - an EB 1.1 Romani AAR with historical house-rules (now ceased)
    Heirs to Lysimachos - an EB 1.1 Epeiros-as-Pergamon AAR with semi-historical houserules (now ceased)
    Philetairos' Gift - a second EB 1.1 Epeiros-as-Pergamon AAR


Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO