The Study of Creating Unrest in Settlements.

[PershsNhpios]

( I could not really call it an art.)

Now, there are always comments cropping up in AARs, Progression threads, and tactic advice in general, about people using numerous spies to cause a settlement to revolt.

I have an Arverni game in progress, which I will update in the FP thread, and it is at 252 BC.
I have conquered all of Gaul excepting the Aquitani and Nervii, and those hapless, fun-loving Romans are at it again!

It has been an arms-race since I conquered the Aedui in 271, (No cheating - I am having my best campaign in all the TW games I have played - all thanks to The EBBS Script Speed modification)

Both Romans and Arverni have gathered as many settlements as possible, and now I come to the point:

My main tactic, whilst war was undeclared, was to attempt to have rebellions caused throughout Italy.
I trained 20 spies, and sent 5 against Taras - it was converted to the Epirotes within two turns.
However, has anyone noticed that with settlements with no previous faction to revert to - no matter how many spies are in the town - the town will begin to rebel, and then suddenly go from 25% PO to 180%?!

How do you fix this?

I had Roma rebelling with 6 spies, and everytime it just flips back to 175%!

Please tell me how to wage this silent war!

Or is it impossible in this circumstance?

I can't even make Bononia or Segesta rebel.. Gar! Incompetence!

[Xurr]

Because Romani is the faction that Rome will rebel to. Hence when you cause the rebellion you see Rome rebel to its "new faction" Romani, never mind that it's old faction was Romani the game doesn't seem to care what the old faction was.

[PershsNhpios]

Thank you Xurr!

I don't mean to be too prying, however are there any more in-depth explanations for this?

I have heard of people relieving the Seleukids of a good third of their territory using spies..

All I want is to have the Illyrian and Ligurian towns rebel nicely!

Please?

[The General]

All I want is to have the Illyrian and Ligurian towns rebel nicely!

Please?

They ought to "join" the Eleutheroi, imho, and thus become independent again.

I mean, they weren't that Romanized/integrated by 272BC, considering the Social War in 91-88 BC, almost two centuries later...

[PershsNhpios]

Exactly, they had only held Segesta for one half of a turn, and I had five spies in there, telling those Ligurians to take up arms again.

25% was the P.O., and the next turn a rebellion was in place - one turn later, 75%, then 100%, and now it's at 150%.

It's simply not fair! So, if anybody has time - you would be buying a young Arverni child three or four years more life before he has to be thrown against the Camillan Legions.

[Lysandros]

Well, I've never seen a settlement rebel to the faction it already belonged to. The sudden increase in public order sounds for me like the AI reacted in a common way: it lowered taxes and possibly used troops, spies and family members to raise public order. Unfortunately I can't find an article on the mechanics of spying besides this one: http://www.twcenter.net/wiki/Spy
If I remember correctly, the spy with the highest subterfuge is the dominant factor in causing unrest and all your other spies only add a relatively small amount of unrest. So if you have a very good spy revealed and killed and the remaining ones are mediocre at best, the decrease in public order will remarkably change (in addition to all other counter-spy tactics mentioned above). Can anybody direct to the "how does xy work?" threads?