Results 1 to 22 of 22

Thread: Wikipedia

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default Re: Wikipedia

    If you can see a mistake in a Wikipedia page, why don't you just edit the page to rectify the problem?

  2. #2
    REGIVS ORATOR LINGVAE LATINAE Member Jaume's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    92

    Default Re: Wikipedia

    Quote Originally Posted by I Am Herenow
    If you can see a mistake in a Wikipedia page, why don't you just edit the page to rectify the problem?
    Because it is funnier to criticize I suppose...

  3. #3

    Default Re: Wikipedia

    It says 288, and in the next paragraph it says 264.

  4. #4
    Member Member anubis88's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Slovenia
    Posts
    3,400

    Default Re: Wikipedia

    Quote Originally Posted by alatar
    It says 288, and in the next paragraph it says 264.
    Yeah, i missed it.
    Europa Barbarorum Secretary

  5. #5

    Default Re: Wikipedia

    Still, you've got to love wikipedia for finding fact's, very usefull, despite it's flaws.

  6. #6

    Default Re: Wikipedia

    I don't know how valid this is... But apparantly one study concluded that Wikipedia was no worse than the Encyclopedia Britannica in terms of making errors...

  7. #7
    Whatever Member konny's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Germania Inferior
    Posts
    1,787

    Default Re: Wikipedia

    Wikipedia becomes the more reliable the more people read, write and correct an article, as a rule of thumb. You should also check different wikis (if your knowledge of languages allow) and take a look at the discussion pages of each.
    Last edited by konny; 05-04-2008 at 14:58.

    Disclaimer: my posts are to be considered my private opinion and not offical statements by the EB Team

  8. #8
    Whatever Member konny's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Germania Inferior
    Posts
    1,787

    Default Re: Wikipedia

    Quote Originally Posted by alatar
    It says 288, and in the next paragraph it says 264.
    288 is the year when the Marmertines conquered Messana. Not realy an error but left out what is meant.

    Disclaimer: my posts are to be considered my private opinion and not offical statements by the EB Team

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO