Results 1 to 30 of 104

Thread: Phalanxes in version 1.1

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    is on the outside looking out Member PraetorFigus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    The Windy City
    Posts
    49

    Lightbulb Re: Phalanxes in version 1.1

    Quote Originally Posted by Watchman View Post
    *casts Animate Thread*

    Say Figus, you mentioned the 0.3 radius didn't have meaningful effects when it came to battle results, but how about unit behaviour ? The way the soldiers keep spreading out more or less regardless of the formation density values when not in guardmode is pretty annoying, and I was wondering if that value could be used to at least lessen the effect even if it doesn't have much "mechanical" effect - altering the behaviour but not the performance, if you see what I mean.
    I need to run more tests, but it could have an effect on unit cohesion. I was also testing .25 along with .3 before RL and sickness kicked me in the bud

    from what I observed those two values are not as dramatic as 0.2 which also helps a unit when flanked to stay closer together. when surrounded morale level, discipline and level of training are still very important for how long a unit lasts before routing from what I saw.
    so instead of continually flattening out against the enemy, the units seemed to retain a bit more rank depth and get a lot more kills,

    Here are a few examples, but I need to do more testing and get screenshots!
    in a siege battle against defending gauls with no time limit, the rorarii, tested with 0.2, were more effective but still routed with 30-40 troops left, the difference in my tests is that they actually killed some gauls before routing with 0.2 radius, they kept their ranks without guardmode better


    in another siege battle this time against Germans no time limit again, I had a single stack of Polybian Principes defeat three full stacks of German mixed units of spearmen, I don't know the names of individual German units. I barely lost 4 troops per Principe unit which was shocking to me, I expected a crushing defeat, but got a Heroic Victory.


    in another one-on-one test, the ekodromoi still surround a real phalanx head-on but seemed to take less losses and inflict more on the phalanx, but the unit was phalangitai deuteroi that I was testing against.


    the good news is that the radius should do what your talking about Watchman with the units, but to what extent needs more testing.

    has anyone else done testing with unit radius to confirm or deny that a smaller radius will keep units from spreading out?

    I've finally figured out how to get screenshots online so once I get a way to take multiple screen shots I will post more definitive findings!
    "One often meets his destiny on the road he takes to avoid it." Oogway, Kung Fu Panda

    "Mortui Tantum Terminem Belli Viderunt" (Only the dead have seen the end of war)
    a technical memory solution

  2. #2

    Default Re: Phalanxes in version 1.1

    unit cohesion is the sole reason i am including this in RTR; but only for hoplite and phalangite units
    Those who would give up essential liberties for a perceived sense of security deserve neither liberty nor security--Benjamin Franklin

  3. #3
    Ming the Merciless is my idol Senior Member Watchman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Helsinki, Finland
    Posts
    7,967

    Default Re: Phalanxes in version 1.1

    Why ?
    "Let us remember that there are multiple theories of Intelligent Design. I and many others around the world are of the strong belief that the universe was created by a Flying Spaghetti Monster. --- Proof of the existence of the FSM, if needed, can be found in the recent uptick of global warming, earthquakes, hurricanes, and other natural disasters. Apparently His Pastaness is to be worshipped in full pirate regalia. The decline in worldwide pirate population over the past 200 years directly corresponds with the increase in global temperature. Here is a graph to illustrate the point."

    -Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster

  4. #4

    Default Re: Phalanxes in version 1.1

    because those are the units for which propper employment depends the most on maintaining unit cohesion
    Those who would give up essential liberties for a perceived sense of security deserve neither liberty nor security--Benjamin Franklin

  5. #5
    Ming the Merciless is my idol Senior Member Watchman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Helsinki, Finland
    Posts
    7,967

    Default Re: Phalanxes in version 1.1

    And that's different from other shieldwalls how ?
    "Let us remember that there are multiple theories of Intelligent Design. I and many others around the world are of the strong belief that the universe was created by a Flying Spaghetti Monster. --- Proof of the existence of the FSM, if needed, can be found in the recent uptick of global warming, earthquakes, hurricanes, and other natural disasters. Apparently His Pastaness is to be worshipped in full pirate regalia. The decline in worldwide pirate population over the past 200 years directly corresponds with the increase in global temperature. Here is a graph to illustrate the point."

    -Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO