Actually I though Navaros answer was a very good rebuttal from a religious perspective.
I'll break it down into its paragraphs and add my comments below each.
No matter how smart one is or how many people agree with you it does not make a statement true. Most science is written in the third person to try and remove personal authourity from an individual report. God cannot be proven or disproven. However one can't prove which religion is right or not either, or if indeed any on Earth is correct at all. So why not treat them with equal weight and not raise one above the other. Which is what Einstein was talking about too.Originally Posted by Navaros
Correct some of his remarks might have gotten him a warning point in the Backroom. But as a private message we normally don't police that. Also what he states isOriginally Posted by Navaros
So he complements the stories as honourable but their format as primitive (like virtually all religions) and the stories as pretty childish (most religions present there stories in easy to understand primary school level ideas). So it would be rather difficult hypothetically speaking to give him a warning point or two.Originally Posted by Einstein
Nice riposte and turning of the cheek.Originally Posted by Navaros
![]()
Bookmarks