Results 1 to 30 of 130

Thread: For PanzerJaeger, comparing the armies of WW2

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #11
    Awaiting the Rapture Member rotorgun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Not in Kansas anymore Toto....
    Posts
    971

    Default Re: For PanzerJaeger, comparing the armies of WW2

    Quote Originally Posted by PanzerJaeger
    What do you guys think of the American military?

    It certainly had some good units, but without the massive support it usually had at its disposal, it was prone to falter - especially the regular infantry divisions.

    In the pacific, however, the Marines dominated. Does that speak to their skill or the deficiencies of the Japanese?

    While I am certainly proud of the history of our army during WWII, I should like to point out one fact often overlooked by many. In fighting the Germans in Europe, at no time, except possibly during the Ardennes campaign, did the Western Allies face more then roughly one fourth of the German Army. The balance was in the east, where the majority of the elite SS and Whermacht mobile units were assigned. In many cases, the Americans and Allies were fighting second rate troops, backed up by some elite forces who were badly outnumbered and dominated from the skies. Even then, the Germans came close to inflicting a stalemate upon them.

    If there was any area in which the US Army excelled in, it was probably the coordination of its artillery fires. Theirs was the fastest, most flexible, and accurate overall of all the Armies of WWII. The British could occasionally deliver faster predesignated barrages, but they sacrificed accuracy to do so. The Germans could make more accurate fires sat times as well, but never with anything near the speed. The fire control system of the Americans often enabled the massing of all available batteries within range of a specific target in less than 10 minutes. It was this that enabled them to defeat the 1st SS Panzer Corps at Elsenborn Ridge during December 1944 as one example.

    Another trait of the American Army was, and still is, an uncanny ability to adapt its doctrines, tactics, and strategies on the fly, so to speak. This often makes us unpredictable. As Field Marshall Rommel said of us:

    "The reason that the Americans learn to fight so quickly is that War is chaos, and they practice chaos on a daily basis." I have observed this characteristic on numerous occasions in over thirty years service in the US Army, and have practiced it myself from time to time.

    In the Pacific, the Marines were the perfect opponents for the Japanese, being nearly as stoic. I'll have to sort out my thoughts as to why they were so dominate. Certainly the overwhelming material advantages they had were one factor, but this alone was not the only reason.

    PS: Goodnight friends, I'll have to take it up tomorrow as it's a bit late for an old dude like me to be up when I have to work in the AM.
    Last edited by rotorgun; 05-19-2008 at 05:32.
    Rotorgun
    ...the general must neither be so undecided that he entirely distrusts himself, nor so obstinate as not to think that anyone can have a better idea...for such a man...is bound to make many costly mistakes
    Onasander

    Editing my posts due to poor typing and grammer is a way of life.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO