Results 1 to 30 of 130

Thread: For PanzerJaeger, comparing the armies of WW2

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #25
    Awaiting the Rapture Member rotorgun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Not in Kansas anymore Toto....
    Posts
    971

    Default Re: For PanzerJaeger, comparing the armies of WW2

    Quote Originally Posted by Sarmatian
    If I may move a bit from tank discussions, I wanted to ask some more knowledgable people here about manpower of Germany and SU. People often emphasize Soviet huge manpower, expecially compared to the Germans.

    Now, at the time of WW2, Germany had around 50 million population. Soviet Union had 120 million. If we count all satelite states of Germany (Romania, Hungary etc...) that is probably 10-20 million more. Now, before the war even started Soviets lost enormous amonts of territory, most notably Ukraine and a good deal of European Russia, which was most heavily populated territory. Furthermore, German started sieging even more big population centers like Leningrad for example.

    So at the onset of the winter 1941, Germans are in front of Moscow, Leningrad is besieged, much of territory is lost. How much population was "left" in the SU? If I'm not mistaken, most of new soldiers were conscripted from behind the Urals, which wasn't your most densely populated area of the SU. I somehow think that this entire "huge manpower advantage" was a bit exagerated, and that the reason Soviets had so much more men was that they adjusted their entire country to "total war" concept from the start, while Germans haven't until some time later. Any insights?
    Here was an interesting link I came across last night as I was wondering about some of the casualty figures quoted in various posts. It contains some useful information to compare the relative strengths and losses estimated for many countries, even some of the more obscure ones.

    http://www.worldwar-2.net/casualties...ties-index.htm

    Here is what is claimed for both Germany and the Soviet Union:

    Germany - World War 2 Flag Germany
    Status: Independent
    Type of Government: Dictatorship
    Religion: Christian
    Population: 73,000,000 (1938)
    Germans - 70,990,000
    Poles - 1,000,000
    Jews - 707,000
    Russians - 200,000
    Danes - 30,000
    Gypsies - 28,000
    Wends - 20,000
    Frisians - 15,000
    Lithuanians - 10,000 Alignment (1939 - 1945):
    Axis Partner
    1st Sep 1939 - 8th May 1945 Casualties (1939 - 1945):
    Soldiers (Axis) - 3,350,000 Killed
    Civilians - 3,043,000 Killed
    Jews - 205,500 Killed
    Gypsies - 20,000 Killed

    USSR - World War 2 Flag Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR)
    Status: Independent
    Type of Government: Communist
    Religion: Atheist
    Population: 190,000,000 (1939)
    Russians - 100,000,000
    Ukrainians - 15,400,000
    Uzbekis - 10,000,000
    Kazakhs - 5,000,000
    Byelorussians - 4,400,000
    Azerbaijanis - 2,500,000
    Tajiks - 2,500,000
    Georgians - 2,100,000
    Turkmen - 2,000,000
    Jews - 1,907,000
    Kyrgyz - 1,500,000
    Armenians - 1,300,000
    Kabardins - 700,000
    Ossetians - 600,000
    Chechens - 350,000
    Volksdeutsch - 340,000
    Tatars - 300,000
    Bulgars - 200,000
    Greeks - 125,000
    Gagaus - 100,000
    Others - 38,678,000 Alignment (1939 - 1945):
    Neutral
    1st Sep 1939 - 22nd Jun 1941
    Allied Partner
    22nd Jun 1941 - 8th May 1945
    Neutral
    8th May 1945 - 9th Aug 1945
    Allied Partner
    9th Aug 1945 - 2nd Sep 1945 Casualties (1941 - 1945):
    Soldiers (Allied) - 13,300,000 Killed
    Soldiers (Axis) - 408,000 Killed
    Civilians - 6,500,000 Killed
    Jews - 1,000,000 Killed
    As one can see, the Soviets outnumbered Germany by almost 3-1 in manpower. What is interesting is the disparity in casualties, with the Germans dishing out a better than 4-1 outcome in military casualties. Of course many of Germany's losses were suffered in the west, but over 75% were likely from the east front.

    PS: I think that this shows that there wasn't a "huge manpower advantage". It was also the vast areas involved in the Eastern campaign and the fact that Germany was fighting in the west, and in Southern Europe and Africa as well that made it impossible for the German Army to keep up with the attrition.
    Last edited by rotorgun; 05-22-2008 at 04:46.
    Rotorgun
    ...the general must neither be so undecided that he entirely distrusts himself, nor so obstinate as not to think that anyone can have a better idea...for such a man...is bound to make many costly mistakes
    Onasander

    Editing my posts due to poor typing and grammer is a way of life.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO