Let me put this out there too, when I was the Chancellor in KotR I had serious doubts about my ability to perform the technical aspects of the job. I screwed up giving the AI money for the first two turns of my Chancellorship, I (possibly) somehow cost NN his avatar in a battle where he didn't die, but was dead afterward, and I cost TC no small amount of work myself. I'm not commenting on Igno's mistakes in any way shape or form because I've been there and made them myself. Given the difficulties of the technical situation right now I think he's done better than I would have.

I did not, however, during the course of my Chancellorship, knowingly violate a single rule. I did not, despite my secret position in the Illuminati, abuse the rules to deny 'our' opponents resources or fair opportunities under the rules. I worked hard to keep an even hand OOC, even while my IC actions and posts were overwhelming malicious towards certain individuals (Ironically one of them was Cecil).

It can be a fine line. It is not, IMHO, acceptable to simply say 'I ignored the line because my character wanted me to.' If I had done so I would've expected to be punished OOC, and certainly would've apologized to the player I'd done it to.

I hope that clears things up, and makes it a little more obvious that I'm not attacking Igno, I just have a very exact idea of what he just did and I consider it to be a wedge into the break down of the whole game.