Results 1 to 18 of 18

Thread: Phalanx V Legion (Best army backbone?)

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default Phalanx V Legion (Best army backbone?)

    I have been waiting to post this debate that not only I but, many RTW players and historians have been mumbling around about.

    Like all great armies of the ancient world a strong and steady backbone is needed to be there as support for sudden shifts in the power struggles of battle. Something that allows a base for a re-group and re-luanch of an attack or defense. However, what unit creates the greatest and most powreful backbone to any army of expansionist aims.

    The debate is between the great hellenistic phalanx and the military precision of the Roman Legion. Both, have allowed their generals to reach legendary fame. For example Alexander the Great's Macedonian Phalanx (my choice of an army backbone) or the Cold wall of sheilds and javelins that is the Emperor's first legionaire cohort.

    First I will allow some freindly veiws before I give my study.

    (i have studied both schools of thought. Through many ancient histories extended essay projects at my college.)

    I await your opinions.

    LET TOTAL DEBATE BEGIN!!!

    ---------------------------------------------------
    "The Art of War is the Art of Deception...when concentrated, feign despersion...appear where unexpected...when great appear small...when obvious appear unpredictable....
    LURE WITH BAIT....STRIKE! STRIKE WITH CHAOS!
    SUN TZU ART OF WAR
    ---------------------------------------------------

  2. #2
    Senior Member Senior Member Quintus.JC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,572

    Default Re: Phalanx V Legion (Best army backbone?)

    This should be in the Monastery. Are junior members allowed to post threads in the Monastery?

    Very interesting topic BTW.
    Last edited by Quintus.JC; 05-17-2008 at 20:00.

  3. #3
    Camel Lord Senior Member Capture The Flag Champion Martok's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    In my own little world....but it's okay, they know me there.
    Posts
    8,257

    Default Re: Phalanx V Legion (Best army backbone?)

    Welcome to the Org, Hyeranicus Maximus! I think you'll discover that both sides of this argument have plenty of proponents here.


    Quote Originally Posted by Quintus.J.Cicero
    This should be in the Monastery. Are junior members allowed to post threads in the Monastery?
    No they cannot, since the Monastery is part of the forum's Miscellaneous section. That said, I doubt it'll be long before this thread picks up steam.
    "MTW is not a game, it's a way of life." -- drone

  4. #4
    Senior Member Senior Member Quintus.JC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,572

    Default Re: Phalanx V Legion (Best army backbone?)

    Quote Originally Posted by Martok

    No they cannot, since the Monastery is part of the forum's Miscellaneous section. That said, I doubt it'll be long before this thread picks up steam.
    The moderators can move it there, when i was a junior member I post a thread 'favourite Historical battle' in the Colosume, which was first intended to be around RTW but eventually jump to a history discussion, then the moderator moved it to the Monastery. I'm sure this will be a hit in the monastry.

  5. #5
    Beauty hunter Senior Member Raz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Australia.
    Posts
    1,089

    Default Re: Phalanx V Legion (Best army backbone?)

    Ok, lets get debating...
    Note: It should be, well... noted that I am not too great on the tactics of ancient warfare. At least in Europe...

    I personally believe that the Roman legion had both a much greater fighting power and more flexibility over the hellenistic and (dare I say it) unsophisticated phalanx. The legion was not vulnerable in any situation, when on the move or in rough ground, the phalanx was easily crushed when there were gaps in between the soldiers such as when the army was fighting in rough terrain. The legion had plenty of auxillary and cavalry detachments on either flank compared to the phalanx armies that had poor cavalry (hailing from the rough fields of Greece) and few reserves, once their cavalry was destroyed, the phalanx was easily flanked and quickly annihilated. I admit that Rome was not exactly renowned for their cavalry but I can safely say that their equites were better drilled than the hippeis of ancient Greece.

    The only times when the Roman legion was completely and utterly annihilated was when the legion was:
    a) on unfavourable ground. (lowlands, dense woods)
    b) completely outnumbered. (1:4, 1:5 etc.)
    c) unprepared, unready or taken by surprise. (usually the cause, ambushes etc.)
    d) indisciplined and did not respond to orders (sometimes the cause, but usually much more disastrous when it happened)

    I await being flamed...
    Quote Originally Posted by drone
    I imagine an open-source project to recreate [Medieval: Total War] would be faced with an army of high-valour lawyers.

    Live your life out on Earth; I'm going to join the Sun.

  6. #6
    the G-Diffuser Senior Member pevergreen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    11,585
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default Re: Phalanx V Legion (Best army backbone?)

    Ingame or out?
    Quote Originally Posted by TosaInu
    The org will be org until everyone calls it a day.

    Quote Originally Posted by KukriKhan View Post
    but I joke. Some of my best friends are Vietnamese villages.
    Quote Originally Posted by Lemur
    Anyone who wishes to refer to me as peverlemur is free to do so.

  7. #7

    Default Re: Phalanx V Legion (Best army backbone?)

    Hi everyone, this is my first post here, I am exited about history!

    I never knew about The Battle of Cynoscephalae or the Battle of Pydna. Thanks for the links, Quintus.J.Cicero.

    If you were talking about history, a phalanx, if charged from the back couldn't turn around without stabbing their own army in the back. Even if they raised their pikes, they would turn around very slowly.

    In RTW, I think a Legionary cohort would be better because they can turn quicker if they were attacked in their back. But still, a phalanx is much more effective at fighting if calvary and horsemen were charging it. A phalanx can not move quickly over the ground on rough terrain but a Legionary cohort can move quickly over the ground.
    "Then we shall fight in the shade." Leonidas of Sparta before battle of Thermopylae.

  8. #8

    Default Re: Phalanx V Legion (Best army backbone?)

    I think the subject here is more about historical battles and strategies. RTW is a terrific game, but we all know that several flaws prevent strategy to be fully used. In a real field of battle, several more factors have influence than just stamina and morale.


    About Alexander's tactics, you are right about that. The sarissa was not the sole weapon of his army. His tactic of making archers fire in turns, row after row, made his archer battalions be like a machine gun on a ancient battlefield.

  9. #9
    Senior Member Senior Member Quintus.JC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,572

    Default Re: Phalanx V Legion (Best army backbone?)

    Actually Alexander didn't deploy a great deal of archers in his army. The majority of his army was made of Pezhetairoi, heavy Macedonian phalanx infantry who were very effective against both cavalry and infantry. They were aided by Companion and other forms of powerful shock cavalry, and the main missile corps were the Peltasts, which normally made more than 20% of Alexander's army. Peltast in RTW are rather weak but Alexander seems to be able to put them to good uses, they were later replaced by the more powerful Thureophoroi, which resembles the characteristics of Heavy peltasts in RTW.
    Last edited by Quintus.JC; 05-24-2008 at 19:57.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO