Results 1 to 18 of 18

Thread: Expensive phalanxes not worthwhile

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default Expensive phalanxes not worthwhile

    Does anyone agree that buying expensive phalanx troops (vs cheap ones) is not worthwhile - even if they come head to head a cheap unit will take a long time to be wittled down by an expensive one (which provides ample opportunity for flanking). Also against non-phalanx units the cheap units are almost equally effective (provided that the wall is not penetrated).

  2. #2

    Default Re: Expensive phalanxes not worthwhile

    For city garrisons, cheap ones are better, but for offensive army cutting down losses during battles means you can advance faster without waiting for reinforcements. So, if you have the economy to afford them, better phalanxes will enable faster advance.

  3. #3
    Member Member stupac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    This place called 'rooms,' there's a whole chain of them.
    Posts
    287

    Default Re: Expensive phalanxes not worthwhile

    They can be expensive, but they are unstoppable tanks on the battlefield. The selucid and makedonian silver shields will often fight to the last man even if flanked, and their superior close combat and armor makes them pretty tough and more versatile. I use them frequently, but usually only 1 or 2 units to stick on the flanks in tough battles.
    Colder than a gut-shot bitch wolf dog with nine suckin' pups pulling a #4 trap up a hill in the dead of winter in the middle of a snowstorm with a mouth full of porcupine quills.

    My videos

  4. #4
    EBII Hod Carrier Member QuintusSertorius's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    23,486

    Default Re: Expensive phalanxes not worthwhile

    I just had three units of not-even-full-strength reformed Makedonian phalangites seriously chew up my Roman army. They had silver chevron experience, but even so, they could have fought on til Armageddon came.
    It began on seven hills - an EB 1.1 Romani AAR with historical house-rules (now ceased)
    Heirs to Lysimachos - an EB 1.1 Epeiros-as-Pergamon AAR with semi-historical houserules (now ceased)
    Philetairos' Gift - a second EB 1.1 Epeiros-as-Pergamon AAR


  5. #5
    Βασιλευς και Αυτοκρατωρ Αρχης Member Centurio Nixalsverdrus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Γερμανια Ελευθερα
    Posts
    2,321

    Default AW: Expensive phalanxes not worthwhile

    Cheap phalangites die relatively fast in comparison to high-end phalangites.

  6. #6
    Senior Member Senior Member Beefy187's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Tokyo
    Posts
    6,383
    Blog Entries
    15

    Default Re: Expensive phalanxes not worthwhile

    I hate fighting phalanx. This just shows how good they are.. Even if I charge couple heavy cavalry couple times they seem to last longer then other spear/sword units.

    Expensive phalanx in the enemy army means prepare to have heavy casualty for me...


    Quote Originally Posted by Beskar View Post
    Beefy, you are a silly moo moo at times, aren't you?

  7. #7
    NOBAΛO AYΣE Member Ayce's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    București, România
    Posts
    442

    Default Re: Expensive phalanxes not worthwhile

    Quote Originally Posted by stupac View Post
    They can be expensive, but they are unstoppable tanks on the battlefield. The selucid and makedonian silver shields will often fight to the last man even if flanked, and their superior close combat and armor makes them pretty tough and more versatile. I use them frequently, but usually only 1 or 2 units to stick on the flanks in tough battles.
    You haven't met the Rhomphaiaphoroi yet, I see.

  8. #8
    Death and Glory TW modder Member Flying Pig's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Looking for a place to land...
    Posts
    313

    Default Re: Expensive phalanxes not worthwhile

    How can you not love the elite phalanxes, you heartless fiend? The Chaionion Agema, Kleruchon Agema and Hoplitai Epilektoi are among the best-skinned units in EB, and phahlanxes definitly are some of the most killy. Hoplitai Haploi are the best militia, though, and I have only ever kept 2 units of elite pikes in a city for more than 5 turns, that's during a massive Roman seige of Alexandria as the Ptolomaioi.
    Last edited by Flying Pig; 06-10-2008 at 20:44.
    Death And Glory TW Needs You - Sign Up Now! All it takes is one PM!

    Ὦ ξεῖν', ἀγγέλλειν Λακεδαιμονίοις ὅτι τῇδε
    κείμεθα, τοῖς κείνων ῥήμασι πειθόμενοι.

    Ō zein', angellein Lakedaimoniois hoti tēide
    keimetha tois keinōn rhēmasi peithomenoi.

    Go, thou that passeth, to the Spartans tell
    That as per their orders, here we fell.

  9. #9

    Default Re: Expensive phalanxes not worthwhile

    Dont forget the fact that the low end levy phalanx units tend to have low stamina compared to higher end ones. Ive found this is a disadvantage in siege battles where I rotate tired and fresh phalanxes for optimum efficiency. Takes a while longer to do this with cheaper ones due to slower stamina regen.

  10. #10
    NOBAΛO AYΣE Member Ayce's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    București, România
    Posts
    442

    Default Re: Expensive phalanxes not worthwhile

    Quote Originally Posted by Flying Pig View Post
    How can you not love the elite phalanxes, you heartless fiend? The Chaionion Agema, Kleruchon Agema and Hoplitai Epilektoi are among the best-skinned units in EB, and phahlanxes definitly are some of the most killy.
    Oh, I like them, but they fall like flies when pitted against AP Armored Infantry.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO