Thank you very much for the answers....
I wonder whether the tendency to use mercenaries is driven by pressures which mean that the citizen manpower is no longer enough, or whether the citizens are no longer willing to serve (e.g. the Roman equites giving up their cavalry role because they were too rich to fight!)
Thinking about the Carthaginians - I hear a lot about mercenaries from Hispania. Did these troops account for the bulk of the increase in Carthaginian mercenary use; and do you think there would have been Iberian mercenaries on the market if there were no Carthaginian colonies in the area?
And the Romans - did they start using mercenaries more after the Marian reforms took place, or before?
Indeed, it is an oversimplification.Originally Posted by QuintusSertorius
I don't think it's too Marxist to say that there were pressures between the senators and the plebians, and that this produced a series of controversial issues (which individual politicians arranged themselves around in the manner you describe).
I am mainly wondering what the equivalent fundamental pressures and issues in other nations were (well I mainly care about Macedon, Egypt, Carthage and the Seleucids but ideas about others would be useful too :) )
Bookmarks