Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 53

Thread: US Supreme Court strikes down death penalty for child rapists

  1. #1
    The very model of a modern Moderator Xiahou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    in the cloud.
    Posts
    9,007

    Default US Supreme Court strikes down death penalty for child rapists

    I thought this case was interesting and was surprised to see no one brought it up.
    While the court ruling effectively ends the use of the death penalty for child rape, the court left open its use for crimes such as "treason, espionage, terrorism, and drug kingpin activity, which are offenses against the state," the ruling states. "As it relates to crimes against individuals, though, the death penalty should not be expanded to instances where the victim's life was not taken."
    Let me start out by saying that I don't like the death penalty. I don't think that 'eye for an eye' is a good system of justice and that there is no particularly convincing evidence that the death penalty acts as a significant deterrent. However, I think the death penalty is within the authority of the state and can have it's place. As such, it should not be banned outright but it should be very limited in its application.

    Having said all of that, I think this case was very poorly decided with little basis in anything other than the personal beliefs of the justices who supported the decision. None of them seem to argue that the death penalty in itself is a "cruel and unusual" punishment. What the court appears to be saying is that when, as they see it, the punishment is too severe for the crime a punishment that is normally acceptable somehow then becomes cruel and unusual- this makes no sense at all. If a punishment is cruel and unusual, then it is cruel and unusual all the time. When that punishment is handed out- whether for first, second, or third degree murder, child rape, or horse theft should be left up to the individual states and their elected legislatures to decide. By the court's reasoning, sticking bamboo shoots under your fingernails might not necessarily be cruel and unusual- just so long as the crime is heinous enough (in their view) to warrant it.

    Personally, I don't really think that execution is appropriate for sex offenders- but me thinking that has no bearing on whether or not it's cruel and unusual. Thoughts?
    Last edited by Xiahou; 06-26-2008 at 15:04. Reason: Just noticed another thread touched on the case- oh well.
    "Don't believe everything you read online."
    -Abraham Lincoln

  2. #2
    Master of Few Words Senior Member KukriKhan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Posts
    10,415

    Default Re: US Supreme Court strikes down death penalty for child rapists

    Quote Originally Posted by Xiahou
    this makes no sense at all. If a punishment is cruel and unusual, then it is cruel and unusual all the time.
    My thoughts exactly.
    Be well. Do good. Keep in touch.

  3. #3
    Part-Time Polemic Senior Member ICantSpellDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    U.S.
    Posts
    7,237

    Default Re: US Supreme Court strikes down death penalty for child rapists

    Another usurpation of the legislature. I'm not sure why people arn't more concerned with the way the Supreme court acts in the cases. They make things up and impose the morality of 5 on the rest of the country. I don't believe that that the death penalty for rape is really a great idea, but it is not "cruel and unusual punishment" according to the Constitution. The Constitution makes no such claim and the reality is that capital punishment was applied for any number of offenses for a very long time, not just murder.

    These 5 justices seem to believe that if it isn't specifically stated in the Constitution that it is their call. I would assume that if it is not specifically stated in the constitution that is the call of the various state and federal legislatures. Their "legitimacy" came from another incorrect decision by the courts that struck down death penalty laws for the rape of an adult woman citing "cruel and unusual punishment". The Constitution, Bill of Rights and Amendments never seem to be a determining factor for these 5.

    Why do we even need a legislature? Why don't we just have Souter, Stevens, Ginsburg, Breyer & Kennedy write all our laws for us. It might expedite this processes they've already engaged themselves in, saving a tremendous amount of resources. We wouldn't even need to make an amendment to the enumerated powers, we could instead inform them of the change and they would make it so. Ah, European problem solving.

    I think that if liberals really understood the concept of Original meaning that many would champion the likes of Scalia. Dershowitz and Tribe agree with his judicial philosophy while disagreeing with most of his personal and political ideas - which I can live with.

    The rule of law isn't the impediment to appreciating the conservative justices - ideology and a misunderstanding of the Supreme Court's function seems to be.
    Last edited by ICantSpellDawg; 06-26-2008 at 15:24.
    "That rifle hanging on the wall of the working-class flat or labourer's cottage is the symbol of democracy. It is our job to see that it stays there."
    -Eric "George Orwell" Blair

    "If the policy of the government, upon vital questions affecting the whole people, is to be irrevocably fixed by decisions of the Supreme Court...the people will have ceased to be their own rulers, having to that extent practically resigned the government into the hands of that eminent tribunal."
    (Lincoln's First Inaugural Address, 1861).
    ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

  4. #4
    master of the pwniverse Member Fragony's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    The EUSSR
    Posts
    30,680

    Default Re: US Supreme Court strikes down death penalty for child rapists

    If you don't kill anyone death penalty is too much, give back what you take, if that's a life that's what you have to give. Cruel and unusual punishment for childrapist, I can think of a few.

  5. #5
    Master of Few Words Senior Member KukriKhan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Posts
    10,415

    Default Re: US Supreme Court strikes down death penalty for child rapists

    Another thing: does not such a ruling just implicitly encourage more vigilantism? If my mother, daughter, wife, sister is raped, and I know that the state will not kill the perp... in my grief, anger, and frustration, why don't I take the law into my own hands? After which, of course, the State will kill me, for having killed the perp, that not being cruel and unusual punishment.
    Be well. Do good. Keep in touch.

  6. #6
    Part-Time Polemic Senior Member ICantSpellDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    U.S.
    Posts
    7,237

    Default Re: US Supreme Court strikes down death penalty for child rapists

    Redemption

    You think that the Supreme Court has gone to hell in a hand basket and then they go and TOTALLY REDEEM THEMSELVES.

    Well, not exactly "They" - more like Anthony Kennedy. And not exactly "totally redeem themselves" - more like put some caulk in the seems of a bursting dam.

    The power that Kennedy holds makes him the most powerful man in the country. The court tends to be split 4-4. Kennedy is almost always the tie breaker, deciding things arbitrarily. I would love to know what his judicial philosophy is. Wait - I've got it; "Gonzo Constitutionalism", or "Gonzo Judiciary"? Some might call him a "moderate", but they probably think that moderation consists of arbitrarily deciding things without any foundation or by looking a a chart of what you last voted and voting opposite.

    Anyway, I can't wait for the inevitable challenge to the NY gun laws. WEeeeeeee
    Last edited by ICantSpellDawg; 06-26-2008 at 15:53.
    "That rifle hanging on the wall of the working-class flat or labourer's cottage is the symbol of democracy. It is our job to see that it stays there."
    -Eric "George Orwell" Blair

    "If the policy of the government, upon vital questions affecting the whole people, is to be irrevocably fixed by decisions of the Supreme Court...the people will have ceased to be their own rulers, having to that extent practically resigned the government into the hands of that eminent tribunal."
    (Lincoln's First Inaugural Address, 1861).
    ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

  7. #7
    Illuminated Moderator Pogo Panic Champion, Graveyard Champion, Missle Attack Champion, Ninja Kid Champion, Pop-Up Killer Champion, Ratman Ralph Champion GeneralHankerchief's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    On a pirate ship
    Posts
    12,546
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: US Supreme Court strikes down death penalty for child rapists

    "I'm going to die anyway, and therefore have nothing more to do except deliberately annoy Lemur." -Orb, in the chat
    "Lemur. Even if he's innocent, he's a pain; so kill him." -Ignoramus
    "I'm going to need to collect all of the rants about the guilty lemur, and put them in a pretty box with ponies and pink bows. Then I'm going to sprinkle sparkly magic dust on the box, and kiss it." -Lemur
    Mafia: Promoting peace and love since June 2006

    Quote Originally Posted by TosaInu
    At times I read back my own posts [...]. It's not always clear at first glance.


  8. #8

    Default Re: US Supreme Court strikes down death penalty for child rapists

    From a German perspective it seems to me that the judges wanted to play the disproportionality card

    I just wonder why the judges didn´t say so if they meant it that way.

    Xiaohu, has the application of the Principle of Proportionality (TM) been an issue in US constitutional law before?

  9. #9
    Chieftain of the Pudding Race Member Evil_Maniac From Mars's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    6,407

    Default Re: US Supreme Court strikes down death penalty for child rapists

    I don't agree with the death penalty in peacetime, but if you have it, use it for this.

  10. #10
    Part-Time Polemic Senior Member ICantSpellDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    U.S.
    Posts
    7,237

    Default Re: US Supreme Court strikes down death penalty for child rapists

    Quote Originally Posted by Evil_Maniac From Mars View Post
    I don't agree with the death penalty in peacetime, but if you have it, use it for this.
    The real question is: who should be deciding this?
    "That rifle hanging on the wall of the working-class flat or labourer's cottage is the symbol of democracy. It is our job to see that it stays there."
    -Eric "George Orwell" Blair

    "If the policy of the government, upon vital questions affecting the whole people, is to be irrevocably fixed by decisions of the Supreme Court...the people will have ceased to be their own rulers, having to that extent practically resigned the government into the hands of that eminent tribunal."
    (Lincoln's First Inaugural Address, 1861).
    ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

  11. #11
    Prince of Maldonia Member Toby and Kiki Champion, Goo Slasher Champion, Frogger Champion woad&fangs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    2,884

    Default Re: US Supreme Court strikes down death penalty for child rapists

    Quote Originally Posted by GeneralHankerchief View Post
    Out of curiosity, what is an "aggravated crime against nature"?
    Why did the chicken cross the road?

    So that its subjects will view it with admiration, as a chicken which has the daring and courage to boldly cross the road,
    but also with fear, for whom among them has the strength to contend with such a paragon of avian virtue? In such a manner is the princely
    chicken's dominion maintained. ~Machiavelli

  12. #12
    Dux Nova Scotia Member lars573's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Halifax NewScotland Canada
    Posts
    4,114

    Default Re: US Supreme Court strikes down death penalty for child rapists

    Quote Originally Posted by Xiahou View Post
    I thought this case was interesting and was surprised to see no one brought it up.
    Let me start out by saying that I don't like the death penalty. I don't think that 'eye for an eye' is a good system of justice and that there is no particularly convincing evidence that the death penalty acts as a significant deterrent. However, I think the death penalty is within the authority of the state and can have it's place. As such, it should not be banned outright but it should be very limited in its application.

    Having said all of that, I think this case was very poorly decided with little basis in anything other than the personal beliefs of the justices who supported the decision. None of them seem to argue that the death penalty in itself is a "cruel and unusual" punishment. What the court appears to be saying is that when, as they see it, the punishment is too severe for the crime a punishment that is normally acceptable somehow then becomes cruel and unusual- this makes no sense at all. If a punishment is cruel and unusual, then it is cruel and unusual all the time. When that punishment is handed out- whether for first, second, or third degree murder, child rape, or horse theft should be left up to the individual states and their elected legislatures to decide. By the court's reasoning, sticking bamboo shoots under your fingernails might not necessarily be cruel and unusual- just so long as the crime is heinous enough (in their view) to warrant it.

    Personally, I don't really think that execution is appropriate for sex offenders- but me thinking that has no bearing on whether or not it's cruel and unusual. Thoughts?
    I think it makes complete and perfect sense. You don't throw someone in jail for 25 years for jay walking and you don't kill someone for rape.
    If you havin' skyrim problems I feel bad for you son.. I dodged 99 arrows but my knee took one.

    VENI, VIDI, NATES CALCE CONCIDI

    I came, I saw, I kicked ass

  13. #13
    Part-Time Polemic Senior Member ICantSpellDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    U.S.
    Posts
    7,237

    Default Re: US Supreme Court strikes down death penalty for child rapists

    Where does the constitution mention the principle of proportionality? How about the Bill of rights or its addendum?

    Nowhere? What authority does the Supreme Court of the United States have in adopting modern European political concepts in order to suppress U.S. legislative action?

    "Cruel and Unusual" is the name of the game. I don't think that it is either. I wouldn't necessarily ask my representatives to endorse a bill in NY mandating the death penalty in cases of the rape of a child, but I damn sure wouldn't oppose other democratically elected legislatures in other states from making or upholding the laws.
    Last edited by ICantSpellDawg; 06-26-2008 at 16:46.
    "That rifle hanging on the wall of the working-class flat or labourer's cottage is the symbol of democracy. It is our job to see that it stays there."
    -Eric "George Orwell" Blair

    "If the policy of the government, upon vital questions affecting the whole people, is to be irrevocably fixed by decisions of the Supreme Court...the people will have ceased to be their own rulers, having to that extent practically resigned the government into the hands of that eminent tribunal."
    (Lincoln's First Inaugural Address, 1861).
    ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

  14. #14
    Nobody expects the Senior Member Lemur's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Wisconsin Death Trip
    Posts
    15,754

    Default Re: US Supreme Court strikes down death penalty for child rapists

    Full text of the DC v Heller decision. If you'd rather have it in PDF format, that's okay too.

  15. #15
    Part-Time Polemic Senior Member ICantSpellDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    U.S.
    Posts
    7,237

    Default Re: US Supreme Court strikes down death penalty for child rapists

    Quote Originally Posted by Lemur View Post
    Full text of the DC v Heller decision. If you'd rather have it in PDF format, that's okay too.
    Lemur

    What do you think of the decision, having read the full text?
    Last edited by ICantSpellDawg; 06-26-2008 at 16:47.
    "That rifle hanging on the wall of the working-class flat or labourer's cottage is the symbol of democracy. It is our job to see that it stays there."
    -Eric "George Orwell" Blair

    "If the policy of the government, upon vital questions affecting the whole people, is to be irrevocably fixed by decisions of the Supreme Court...the people will have ceased to be their own rulers, having to that extent practically resigned the government into the hands of that eminent tribunal."
    (Lincoln's First Inaugural Address, 1861).
    ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

  16. #16
    Death and Glory TW modder Member Flying Pig's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Looking for a place to land...
    Posts
    313

    Default Re: US Supreme Court strikes down death penalty for child rapists

    Surely it's not cruel to execute traitors, but it is to execute those that take candy from children?

    I reckon capital punishment should only apply in some cases, ie

    The Scum of the Earth offences, such as Treason, Genocide etc

    Murder after being released from prison following a murder conviction
    Death And Glory TW Needs You - Sign Up Now! All it takes is one PM!

    Ὦ ξεῖν', ἀγγέλλειν Λακεδαιμονίοις ὅτι τῇδε
    κείμεθα, τοῖς κείνων ῥήμασι πειθόμενοι.

    Ō zein', angellein Lakedaimoniois hoti tēide
    keimetha tois keinōn rhēmasi peithomenoi.

    Go, thou that passeth, to the Spartans tell
    That as per their orders, here we fell.

  17. #17
    Feeding the Peanut Gallery Senior Member Redleg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Denver working on the Railroad
    Posts
    10,660

    Default Re: US Supreme Court strikes down death penalty for child rapists

    Frankly the essence of the ruling is correct - elevating rape - even child rape to a capital offense is not portional to the crime.

    Frankly the criminal justice system - ie the prisoners themselves do a better job of eaking out the punishment for child rapists
    O well, seems like 'some' people decide to ruin a perfectly valid threat. Nice going guys... doc bean

  18. #18
    The very model of a modern Moderator Xiahou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    in the cloud.
    Posts
    9,007

    Default Re: US Supreme Court strikes down death penalty for child rapists

    Quote Originally Posted by Redleg View Post
    Frankly the essence of the ruling is correct - elevating rape - even child rape to a capital offense is not portional to the crime.

    Frankly the criminal justice system - ie the prisoners themselves do a better job of eaking out the punishment for child rapists
    Proportionality is not for the SCOTUS to decide. A punishment is either cruel and unusual, or it is not- there's no sliding scale. Proportionality is completely subjective and is best left to the state legislatures and their criminal courts.

    As I've said, using fuzzy standards like this, they could allow or disallow literally any punishment dependent only on their whim. Sure, flaying someone alive is cruel and unusual unless the crime is heinous enough- then it's fine.
    "Don't believe everything you read online."
    -Abraham Lincoln

  19. #19
    Part-Time Polemic Senior Member ICantSpellDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    U.S.
    Posts
    7,237

    Default Re: US Supreme Court strikes down death penalty for child rapists

    Right. The reality is that it is for the electorate to decide, whether on a state or federal level. I'm not saying that it is right, but who are 4 people to say it is wrong? Let the electorate say it is wrong if they are so inclined - make the case to them.
    "That rifle hanging on the wall of the working-class flat or labourer's cottage is the symbol of democracy. It is our job to see that it stays there."
    -Eric "George Orwell" Blair

    "If the policy of the government, upon vital questions affecting the whole people, is to be irrevocably fixed by decisions of the Supreme Court...the people will have ceased to be their own rulers, having to that extent practically resigned the government into the hands of that eminent tribunal."
    (Lincoln's First Inaugural Address, 1861).
    ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

  20. #20
    Master Procrastinator Member TevashSzat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    University of Pennsylvania
    Posts
    2,367

    Default Re: US Supreme Court strikes down death penalty for child rapists

    I'm actually inclined to agree with Tuff and Xiahou on this one.

    I say, let the legislature/people decide. I, personally, am very for capital punishment. I think that the death penalty is no where near cruel and unusual in its current incarnation. You get decades to appeal and your death is now painless and relatively quick. The only form of punishment that seems cruel and unusual for me would be anything involving torture or extending punishment to those related to the criminal, but not participants of the crime
    "I do not know what I may appear to the world; but to myself I seem to have been only like a boy playing on the seashore, and diverting myself in now and then finding a smoother pebble or a prettier shell than ordinary, whilst the great ocean of truth lay all undiscovered before me." - Issac Newton

  21. #21
    Oni Member Samurai Waki's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Portland, Ore.
    Posts
    3,925
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: US Supreme Court strikes down death penalty for child rapists

    "The Supreme Court is composed of seven elderly men, who remember the past, and forget about the future."

    ~FDR
    Last edited by Samurai Waki; 06-26-2008 at 21:14. Reason: Misquote

  22. #22
    The Usual Member Ice's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Northville, Michigan
    Posts
    4,259

    Default Re: US Supreme Court strikes down death penalty for child rapists

    Amendment VIII to the US Constitution:

    Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted
    http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitut...#amendmentviii

    The constitution, like usual, is very vague on the subject.

    I'm going to have the agree with SOTUS on this such case: Something can be cruel and unusual on one crime, but not on another.

    It would be cruel and unusual to execute someone for a parking ticket.

    However, it would not be cruel and unusual to execute someone for giving sensitive data to the enemy in wartime resulting in the deaths of hundreds of Americans.



  23. #23

    Default Re: US Supreme Court strikes down death penalty for child rapists

    So if they allowed the death penalty for child rape would that mean that the fundmentalist mormons would be facing the chair as surely their practices would amount to them being classed as repeat offenders

  24. #24
    Praefectus Fabrum Senior Member Anime BlackJack Champion, Flash Poker Champion, Word Up Champion, Shape Game Champion, Snake Shooter Champion, Fishwater Challenge Champion, Rocket Racer MX Champion, Jukebox Hero Champion, My House Is Bigger Than Your House Champion, Funky Pong Champion, Cutie Quake Champion, Fling The Cow Champion, Tiger Punch Champion, Virus Champion, Solitaire Champion, Worm Race Champion, Rope Walker Champion, Penguin Pass Champion, Skate Park Champion, Watch Out Champion, Lawn Pac Champion, Weapons Of Mass Destruction Champion, Skate Boarder Champion, Lane Bowling Champion, Bugz Champion, Makai Grand Prix 2 Champion, White Van Man Champion, Parachute Panic Champion, BlackJack Champion, Stans Ski Jumping Champion, Smaugs Treasure Champion, Sofa Longjump Champion Seamus Fermanagh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Latibulm mali regis in muris.
    Posts
    11,453

    Default Re: US Supreme Court strikes down death penalty for child rapists

    Quote Originally Posted by Tribesman View Post
    So if they allowed the death penalty for child rape would that mean that the fundmentalist mormons would be facing the chair as surely their practices would amount to them being classed as repeat offenders
    SCOTUS' decision does prevent such a sentence. Yes, Texas was one of the states wherein this penalty was available to prosecutors.

    However, the case against the FLDS is apparently running into evidentiary problems. Getting proper evidence against individuals may prove difficult and they're facing "fruit of the poisoned tree" issues as well.
    "The only way that has ever been discovered to have a lot of people cooperate together voluntarily is through the free market. And that's why it's so essential to preserving individual freedom.” -- Milton Friedman

    "The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule." -- H. L. Mencken

  25. #25
    Second-hand chariot salesman Senior Member macsen rufus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Ratae Corieltauvorum
    Posts
    2,481

    Default Re: US Supreme Court strikes down death penalty for child rapists

    Quote Originally Posted by Xiahou
    None of them seem to argue that the death penalty in itself is a "cruel and unusual" punishment. What the court appears to be saying is that when, as they see it, the punishment is too severe for the crime a punishment that is normally acceptable somehow then becomes cruel and unusual- this makes no sense at all. If a punishment is cruel and unusual, then it is cruel and unusual all the time.
    Absolutely. They (and some posters here) seem to be confusing proportionality (ie punishment fitting the crime) with "cruel and unusual". These are two separate ideas and shouldn't be conflated -- UNLESS there is some previous ruling that disproprtionate sentencing is by definition cruel and unusual, but I don't know whether there is or not.

    I seem to recall hearing something in the past year or so that certain methods of applying the death penalty have been suspended due to reasons that could classify under "cruel and unusual" - ie drawn out agony, unreliable effects etc etc, but even so, that doesn't apply to the SENTENCE, only the method.

    FWIW I do not support capital punishment, mostly because I've seen too many innocent people pardoned and released years after conviction, and I believe the role of criminal justice should be focussed on protecting the innocent above punishing the guilty
    ANCIENT: TW

    A mod for Medieval:TW (with VI)

    Discussion forum thread

    Download A Game of Thrones Mod v1.4

  26. #26
    Arena Senior Member Crazed Rabbit's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Between the Mountain and the Sound
    Posts
    11,074
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: US Supreme Court strikes down death penalty for child rapists

    Another case of court activism.

    Anyways, what was especially stupid was they used the 'evolving standards of decency' or whatever - in essence, that public opinion doesn't support this.

    But public opinion supports this, and in a poll at CNN (unscientific I know, but CNN is hardly a right-wing bastion) 75% of people supported it.

    A pathetic ruling; they've taken it upon themselves to dictate the national opinion and use it to alter law as they see fit.

    CR
    Ja Mata, Tosa.

    The poorest man may in his cottage bid defiance to all the forces of the Crown. It may be frail; its roof may shake; the wind may blow through it; the storm may enter; the rain may enter; but the King of England cannot enter – all his force dares not cross the threshold of the ruined tenement! - William Pitt the Elder

  27. #27
    Poll Smoker Senior Member CountArach's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    9,029

    Default Re: US Supreme Court strikes down death penalty for child rapists

    Even criminals have the right to life - the death penalty is wrong.
    Rest in Peace TosaInu, the Org will be your legacy
    Quote Originally Posted by Leon Blum - For All Mankind
    Nothing established by violence and maintained by force, nothing that degrades humanity and is based on contempt for human personality, can endure.

  28. #28
    Part-Time Polemic Senior Member ICantSpellDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    U.S.
    Posts
    7,237

    Default Re: US Supreme Court strikes down death penalty for child rapists

    Quote Originally Posted by CountArach View Post
    Even criminals have the right to life - the death penalty is wrong.
    The constitution of the United States does not share that opinion. Neither do the vast majority of Americans. There are instances in which the practice is allowable, defensible and consistent with most types of human ethical philosophies.

    Who says it is wrong? Why should your opinion obfuscate those of our constitution and and popular opinion?

    It sounds like you've got some work to do convincing everybody.
    "That rifle hanging on the wall of the working-class flat or labourer's cottage is the symbol of democracy. It is our job to see that it stays there."
    -Eric "George Orwell" Blair

    "If the policy of the government, upon vital questions affecting the whole people, is to be irrevocably fixed by decisions of the Supreme Court...the people will have ceased to be their own rulers, having to that extent practically resigned the government into the hands of that eminent tribunal."
    (Lincoln's First Inaugural Address, 1861).
    ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

  29. #29
    Feeding the Peanut Gallery Senior Member Redleg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Denver working on the Railroad
    Posts
    10,660

    Default Re: US Supreme Court strikes down death penalty for child rapists

    Quote Originally Posted by TuffStuffMcGruff View Post
    The constitution of the United States does not share that opinion. Neither do the vast majority of Americans. There are instances in which the practice is allowable, defensible and consistent with most types of human ethical philosophies.
    The constitution is nuetral on the death penalty. It's language leaves it up to society to determine what penalty will be handed out to those convicted of crimes. At one time the Supreme Court of the United States even ruled that the death penalty violates the constitution. So be careful in attempting to place an absolute on the constitution that is not inherent in the language of the constitution. Especially given the fact that the death penalty is often challenged based upon the 8th and 14th Amendments to the document.


    Who says it is wrong? Why should your opinion obfuscate those of our constitution and and popular opinion?

    It sounds like you've got some work to do convincing everybody.
    Personally I have no problem with people who oppose the death penalty. Freedom of speech allows them to voice that opinion regardless if they are the minority opinion or the majority opinion. Remember at one time for a short period of time the Death Penalty was ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court.

    The minute we attempt to silence the dissent on a social issue, is the minute that we lose the fundmental reason why the constitution is one of the greatest governmental documents in history.
    O well, seems like 'some' people decide to ruin a perfectly valid threat. Nice going guys... doc bean

  30. #30
    Part-Time Polemic Senior Member ICantSpellDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    U.S.
    Posts
    7,237

    Default Re: US Supreme Court strikes down death penalty for child rapists

    Quote Originally Posted by Redleg View Post
    The constitution is nuetral on the death penalty. It's language leaves it up to society to determine what penalty will be handed out to those convicted of crimes. At one time the Supreme Court of the United States even ruled that the death penalty violates the constitution. So be careful in attempting to place an absolute on the constitution that is not inherent in the language of the constitution. Especially given the fact that the death penalty is often challenged based upon the 8th and 14th Amendments to the document.



    Personally I have no problem with people who oppose the death penalty. Freedom of speech allows them to voice that opinion regardless if they are the minority opinion or the majority opinion. Remember at one time for a short period of time the Death Penalty was ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court.

    The minute we attempt to silence the dissent on a social issue, is the minute that we lose the fundmental reason why the constitution is one of the greatest governmental documents in history.
    I'm not trying to stifle dissent. I'm trying to say that the arguement should be posited toward voters, not courts

    "no person shall be deprived of life, liberty or property... without the due process of law"

    If read sensibly this line litterally means that, through the due process of law, a person can be deprived of life, liberty or property.

    Proportionality is not established except in cases of excessive fines or bail.

    I don't believe that the death penalty, particularly mandatory death penalties based on certain charges are a great idea because they may deter a confused morallistic jury into not guilty verdicts when the evidence is in favor of guilty (among other reasons), but It is pretty clear that people can be deprived of life with due process of law.
    "That rifle hanging on the wall of the working-class flat or labourer's cottage is the symbol of democracy. It is our job to see that it stays there."
    -Eric "George Orwell" Blair

    "If the policy of the government, upon vital questions affecting the whole people, is to be irrevocably fixed by decisions of the Supreme Court...the people will have ceased to be their own rulers, having to that extent practically resigned the government into the hands of that eminent tribunal."
    (Lincoln's First Inaugural Address, 1861).
    ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO