Results 1 to 23 of 23

Thread: Will cutting out client rulers make the game more stable?

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #4

    Default Re: Will cutting out client rulers make the game more stable?

    yes, recruitable mercenary generals are unrelated.. and in-fact can somewhat make up for any loss of the client rulers, imo. I am thinking i won't remove 'interloper' because that sort of signifies that a local ruler is there who you can't control directly, so you should have a garrison or whatnot, and you can't put your own people to govern without pissing off the people... pretty cool in theory
    Last edited by blitzkrieg80; 06-26-2008 at 18:33.
    HWÆT !
    “Vesall ertu þinnar skjaldborgar!” “Your shieldwall is pathetic!” -Bǫðvar Bjarki [Hrólfs Saga Kraka]
    “Wyrd oft nereð unfǽgne eorl þonne his ellen déah.” “The course of events often saves the un-fey warrior if his valour is good.” -Bēowulf
    “Gørið eigi hárit í blóði.” “Do not get blood on [my] hair.” -Sigurð Búason to his executioner [Óláfs Saga Tryggvasonar: Heimskringla]

    Wes þū hāl ! Be whole (with luck)!

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO