Well I'm starting it up...I'll take it to AAR at some point but it's a Hard/Hard campaign with Venice and I am using Huge unit sizes.
Just at first glance here- is not "greece" and the Agean the priority for expansion, as opposed to any effort made to get lands north?
Again, I'll take what I can get early, but I might develop a very stubborn/stiff attitude with nations surrounding me and become extremely defensive (the let them come in if they want attitude again) while I focus on the Naval buildup and the push east. Constantinople is the end goal- and it's not that far away.
I would already like to control Rome, Constantinople and Jerusalem at once...I just haven't played the game yet so I don't know how long that should take, or what is fast/slow.
Edit: Rereading your post, yeah that's a pretty ballsy push to take Italy early lol. How do you not get excomm'd? But I do agree about Bologna and Florence if I'm going to approach things this way though. It's just a huge advantage early and yes- the earlier the better for Italy.
Remind me of the rule on the papacy again? Is it like mtw where he can only track 1 warning at a time or whatever? And 10 turns to cease or something...(I was considering the pope's friend strategy for a while early and trying to get a Cardinal elected 1st election.)
Edit again: Started things before - As said, H/H difficulties so I start with 8,000 florins. 6,000 of those to buy Bologna? Is it that valuable?
Bookmarks