Results 1 to 30 of 64

Thread: Anti-tank solution

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #4
    Vermonter and Seperatist Member Uesugi Kenshin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    The Mountains.
    Posts
    3,868

    Default Re: Anti-tank solution

    Quote Originally Posted by Poor Bloody Infantry View Post
    That's interesting; I wonder how it worked? I was always taught that the inside of a car (or any other large metal object) is a very safe place to be in a thunderstorm, since the electric current will pass through the outer surface of the car body and not through the passengers. Did it perhaps cause a spark in the tank which ignited the fuel or ammunition?
    I would guess that the crew inside the tank were in contact with metal that was connected to the tank chassis in some way so the current would have passed through them?

    Don't the tires of a car have something to do with people being safe in them, and aren't you toast if you touch any part of the car chassis?

    EDIT: Oh and I think you could argue that RPG's and rocket launchers were innovative "untypical" anti-tank solutions at the time as they started essentially as huge anti-tank grenades with small rockets attached to give the "thrower" (as they were originally thrown or placed) a little more range. The PIAT is also interesting. An AT grenade launcher powered by a spring.
    Last edited by Uesugi Kenshin; 06-27-2008 at 16:39.
    "A man's dying is more his survivor's affair than his own."
    C.S. Lewis

    "So many people tiptoe through life, so carefully, to arrive, safely, at death."
    Jermaine Evans

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO