Results 1 to 30 of 268

Thread: Surprisingly bad units

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default Re: AW: Surprisingly bad units

    Quote Originally Posted by Centurio Nixalsverdrus View Post
    Here are some units I find a bit underpowered



    Brihentin



    For a supposed shock cavalry I consider them weak. Dies quickly in melee. OK, I just stated above that cavalry is not for melee...
    BULL*******!

    When getting them into a melee vs lightly armored troops Alt+click. So the pull out them big old swords with .225 lethality and 10 attack value.

    When getting them into a melee vs heavily armored troops click. Their short spears are AP and they use them at a decently fast rate.

    They give a decent fight to much heavier cavarly (catas et al). Plus they are WAY cheaper.

  2. #2

    Default Re: AW: Surprisingly bad units

    Quote Originally Posted by NeoSpartan View Post
    BULL*******!

    When getting them into a melee vs lightly armored troops Alt+click. So the pull out them big old swords with .225 lethality and 10 attack value.

    When getting them into a melee vs heavily armored troops click. Their short spears are AP and they use them at a decently fast rate.

    They give a decent fight to much heavier cavarly (catas et al). Plus they are WAY cheaper.
    The reason I see most people not liking Brihentin is because they think they will be elite heavy cavalry like their description says, use them like that and are disappointed. But look at their stats, and they are more like very heavy medium cavalry*if there is such a thing*. Think of them and use them like you would medium cavalry, and you won't be disappointed *at least I'm not.* Also he said they were "a bit underpowered," not that they sucked.


    Quote Originally Posted by QuintusSertorius View Post
    Truth be told, the late Makedonian FMs are tanks.
    Hm? The only Successor faction to get reformed bodyguards is Baktria. You don't have to worry about them getting even heavier bodyguards.

    Quote Originally Posted by teh1337tim View Post
    thessalians are bad ass if used properly
    i repeat they are NOT shock calvalry that will row up the dam battleline!!
    leave hetairo and true heavy calv for that
    hehe ur thraikens got ahnialateD? hahaha too bad :P always got more calv xD
    Yea, they kinda are shock cavalry, their job in battle is/was to charge the enemy's flank to route them. If that's not shock cavalry I don't know what is. And how is that last line helpful in the least?



    Also to Centurio Nixalsverdrus: Yes Epeiros can recruit them too.
    Last edited by Fondor_Yards; 08-29-2008 at 18:47.
    I shouldn't have to live in a world where all the good points are horrible ones.

    Is he hurt? Everybody asks that. Nobody ever says, 'What a mess! I hope the doctor is not emotionally harmed by having to deal with it.'

  3. #3
    EBII Hod Carrier Member QuintusSertorius's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    23,493

    Default Re: AW: Surprisingly bad units

    Quote Originally Posted by Fondor_Yards View Post
    Hm? The only Successor faction to get reformed bodyguards is Baktria. You don't have to worry about them getting even heavier bodyguards.
    In that case, Makedonian ones are easily beaten if you've got reasonably well-armoured, sword-armed cavalry. Because I've managed that one time and again with the much lighter Epirote bodyguard. Course having a lance-armed unit who can charge in and out of the melee while the sword-cavalry pin them in place helps, too. Generally though, I let them whittle their numbers down charging pointlessly against my lines first.
    It began on seven hills - an EB 1.1 Romani AAR with historical house-rules (now ceased)
    Heirs to Lysimachos - an EB 1.1 Epeiros-as-Pergamon AAR with semi-historical houserules (now ceased)
    Philetairos' Gift - a second EB 1.1 Epeiros-as-Pergamon AAR


  4. #4
    Βασιλευς και Αυτοκρατωρ Αρχης Member Centurio Nixalsverdrus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Γερμανια Ελευθερα
    Posts
    2,321

    Default AW: Surprisingly bad units

    LOL. It's quite surprising how the benefits of Thessalian Cavalry reveal themselves to the one but not to the other. Quintus, you never really used Thessalian Cavalry. At best you hired a single mercenary unit without any upgrades or experience (logically, cause you don't own Thessalia in your game I presume) and compared it to your battle hardened fully chevroned Thraikioi. You think that Makedonians get another type of bodyguard unit. It's pointless to further discuss that matter with you cause obviously you don't have any significant knowledge about Hellenistic Cavalry in EB. You are the Roman guy, why not just stick to them Romans?

  5. #5

    Default Re: Surprisingly bad units

    Erm, if you look at his sig you'd see his last 2 campaigns are as Eperios...
    I shouldn't have to live in a world where all the good points are horrible ones.

    Is he hurt? Everybody asks that. Nobody ever says, 'What a mess! I hope the doctor is not emotionally harmed by having to deal with it.'

  6. #6
    Βασιλευς και Αυτοκρατωρ Αρχης Member Centurio Nixalsverdrus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Γερμανια Ελευθερα
    Posts
    2,321

    Default AW: Re: Surprisingly bad units

    Quote Originally Posted by Fondor_Yards View Post
    Erm, if you look at his sig you'd see his last 2 campaigns are as Eperios...
    "Epeiros as Pergamon", to be precise.

  7. #7

    Default Re: Surprisingly bad units

    Exactly, which cavalry would he be using then.
    I shouldn't have to live in a world where all the good points are horrible ones.

    Is he hurt? Everybody asks that. Nobody ever says, 'What a mess! I hope the doctor is not emotionally harmed by having to deal with it.'

  8. #8
    EBII Hod Carrier Member QuintusSertorius's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    23,493

    Default Re: AW: Surprisingly bad units

    Quote Originally Posted by Centurio Nixalsverdrus View Post
    LOL. It's quite surprising how the benefits of Thessalian Cavalry reveal themselves to the one but not to the other. Quintus, you never really used Thessalian Cavalry. At best you hired a single mercenary unit without any upgrades or experience (logically, cause you don't own Thessalia in your game I presume) and compared it to your battle hardened fully chevroned Thraikioi. You think that Makedonians get another type of bodyguard unit. It's pointless to further discuss that matter with you cause obviously you don't have any significant knowledge about Hellenistic Cavalry in EB. You are the Roman guy, why not just stick to them Romans?
    Go have a look at either of my Pergamon AARs to see me using Thessalians (early on when I overestimated how effective they might be, based on their stats and their cost). See how poor they are. See me butchering Makedonian FMs with Epirote FMs and Thrakian Prodromoi. See that I actually know how to use my cavalry, as well.

    I use Curepos, Illyrian Hippeis, Thrakian Prodromoi, Eastern Light Cavalry, Hellenistic Mercenary Generals and Epirote FMs to great effect. The only ones out of that lot who aren't mercenary for me are the Eastern Lights. We're not comparing apples with oranges, Thessalians are mercenary for me too.

    So I don't pay much attention to the progression of factions I have no interest in playing, big deal. Still remains that I've killed their FMs with ease.
    Last edited by QuintusSertorius; 08-30-2008 at 00:06.
    It began on seven hills - an EB 1.1 Romani AAR with historical house-rules (now ceased)
    Heirs to Lysimachos - an EB 1.1 Epeiros-as-Pergamon AAR with semi-historical houserules (now ceased)
    Philetairos' Gift - a second EB 1.1 Epeiros-as-Pergamon AAR


  9. #9
    Vicious Celt Warlord Member Celtic_Punk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    In your kitchen, raiding your fridge!
    Posts
    1,575

    Default Re: Surprisingly bad units

    plus Quintus is not the only one here who has said they've been let down on more than one occasion by thessalians
    'Who Dares WINS!' - SAS
    "The republic stands for truth and honour. For all that is noblest in our race. By truth and honour, principle and sacrifice alone will Ireland be free."-Liam Mellows


    Who knows? If it's a enough day we may all end up Generals!"

  10. #10
    Arrogant Ashigaru Moderator Ludens's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    9,063
    Blog Entries
    1

    Lightbulb Re: Surprisingly bad units

    I hate to admit this, but I think Thessalians underpowered as well. Stat-wise Prodromoi offer the same charge value and better stamina at 75% of the cost. Thessalians do better at close-combat, but not that much, and it isn't what cavalry are meant for. The only use I can imagine for Thessalians is to engage and pin enemy heavy cavalry: here they can use their speed, armour and AP side-arm to best effect. However, they do suffer a lot of casualties in the process so you can only do this in a couple of battles before needing reinforcements. Hetairoi on the other hand do this almost without breaking a sweat, while Prodromoi won't do that much worse and are easier to replace.
    Looking for a good read? Visit the Library!

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO