Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: Is necessary to destroy the existing government?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Voluntary Suspension Voluntary Suspension Philippus Flavius Homovallumus's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Isca
    Posts
    13,477

    Default Re: Is necessary to destroy the existing government?

    Quote Originally Posted by QuintusSertorius View Post
    Course if you share the same culture as the existing one, then you lose money by destroying it.
    How do you work that out?
    "If it wears trousers generally I don't pay attention."

    [IMG]https://img197.imageshack.us/img197/4917/logoromans23pd.jpg[/IMG]

  2. #2
    EBII Hod Carrier Member QuintusSertorius's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    23,444

    Default Re: Is necessary to destroy the existing government?

    Quote Originally Posted by Philipvs Vallindervs Calicvla View Post
    How do you work that out?
    Destroying it and building a new one takes time and (more) money than just repairing it.

    Yes it's an exploit, but it's a more efficient choice.
    It began on seven hills - an EB 1.1 Romani AAR with historical house-rules (now ceased)
    Heirs to Lysimachos - an EB 1.1 Epeiros-as-Pergamon AAR with semi-historical houserules (now ceased)
    Philetairos' Gift - a second EB 1.1 Epeiros-as-Pergamon AAR


  3. #3
    EBII Mod Leader Member Foot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Brighton, East Sussex, England (GMT)
    Posts
    10,736

    Default Re: Is necessary to destroy the existing government?

    Quote Originally Posted by QuintusSertorius View Post
    Destroying it and building a new one takes time and (more) money than just repairing it.

    Yes it's an exploit, but it's a more efficient choice.
    So is cheating, doesn't mean its better. Besides as I said, regardless of who built all government buildings (except for nomad ones) can be shared between any faction. If you are a greek faction and you conquer a celtic province with a celtic government you can still use it just like your own. However using it is still considered an exploit.

    Foot
    Last edited by Foot; 07-04-2008 at 14:35.
    EBII Mod Leader
    Hayasdan Faction Co-ordinator


  4. #4
    EBII Hod Carrier Member QuintusSertorius's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    23,444

    Default Re: Is necessary to destroy the existing government?

    Quote Originally Posted by Foot View Post
    So is cheating, doesn't mean its better. Besides as I said, regardless of who built all government buildings (except for nomad ones) can be shared between any faction. If you are a greek faction and you conquer a celtic province with a celtic government you can still use it just like your own. However using it is still considered an exploit.

    Foot
    I know it's an exploit. I know it's "cheating". I was just saying from a pure efficiency viewpoint it's the optimal choice.
    It began on seven hills - an EB 1.1 Romani AAR with historical house-rules (now ceased)
    Heirs to Lysimachos - an EB 1.1 Epeiros-as-Pergamon AAR with semi-historical houserules (now ceased)
    Philetairos' Gift - a second EB 1.1 Epeiros-as-Pergamon AAR


  5. #5
    EBII Mod Leader Member Foot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Brighton, East Sussex, England (GMT)
    Posts
    10,736

    Default Re: Is necessary to destroy the existing government?

    Quote Originally Posted by QuintusSertorius View Post
    I know it's an exploit. I know it's "cheating". I was just saying from a pure efficiency viewpoint it's the optimal choice.
    Yet you still havent explained why its only more efficient if the government is of the same culture.

    Foot
    EBII Mod Leader
    Hayasdan Faction Co-ordinator


  6. #6
    EBII Hod Carrier Member QuintusSertorius's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    23,444

    Default Re: Is necessary to destroy the existing government?

    Quote Originally Posted by Foot View Post
    Yet you still havent explained why its only more efficient if the government is of the same culture.

    Foot
    No culture penalty, even if it's tiny compared to that produced by the governor's building.
    It began on seven hills - an EB 1.1 Romani AAR with historical house-rules (now ceased)
    Heirs to Lysimachos - an EB 1.1 Epeiros-as-Pergamon AAR with semi-historical houserules (now ceased)
    Philetairos' Gift - a second EB 1.1 Epeiros-as-Pergamon AAR


  7. #7
    Unhinged Celtophile Member Aodhan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Tir na n'Og
    Posts
    38

    Default Re: Is necessary to destroy the existing government?

    Quintus, Foot has a very valid point, keeping the government of the deposed leadership may be efficient but it is neither ethical, nor historically accurate. When the Romans conquered a Celtic tribe do you think they would allow the same people who fought them to continue to rule completely unmolested by the government back in Rome, no the Romans would appoint a Roman governor, and drive the former ruling class into the dust. So the best and most ethical way to represent this as an EB player is to destroy the old government and replace it with your own government.
    Last edited by Aodhan; 07-04-2008 at 19:52.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO