Explain to me how that is a critical-sounding question.
I don't think it is...

You never make any effort to think for yourself, to put forward a hypothesis that might fit with what we've done and then deconstruct it for inaccuracies.
I don't understand how this relates to this situation. Anyways the whole point of asking the question was because I couldn't figure out a hypothesis to fit with what you've done.

The end result is that an unsaid assumption of every one of your questions is that the EB team is a bunch of idiots. How else can it be read? If this had been your first question on the forums then it would have been not a problem to answer. However you have a history and therefore ask within the context of that history.

The reputation you have gathered around yourself is one of a poster who's only purpose is to attack the EB team, where no answer is good enough, where you imagine it is your god-given right to pester us more and more even after we have said that we do not currently have the expertise to answer you. To redeem yourself you need to change your attitude. Before you say it, that doesn't mean you must cower before the almighty word of the great and good EB team. We are not always right and never claim to be, however just persistently asking without making any attempt to put forward and defend a different position is just dull. And once you have been answered to the best we are able to do at that time please don't continue as if we've been holding back. If you are not satisfied with the answer then just be satisfied that you have EB to play with (you do play EB, don't you? Or do you just complain about it?).
I never meant to address the team in the first place. Anyone who feels they can answer my question can choose to do so or not. If a team member wants to, great. But I certainly don't expect it. I only questioned konny because he took the time to answer me, which I took to mean that he had the time/expertise to help, but his answers assumed I understood how the trait worked. That's the only reason we went back and forth.

I'm terribly sorry that I've developed a reputation as a negative person. I don't agree that I have to have an opinion to ask questions. I play the devil's advocate, but I don't do it to fight. It's just an effective way to understand a particular issue. None of this is personal. And because I ask a lot of questions doesn't mean that I don't think for myself. It means I try not to create hypotheses without sufficient information.

Anyways, this should be taken to PMs. I just couldn't come back without acknowledging this topic.