Good Lord...
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servl...rnational/home
I'm a little disappointed that the article was so sketchy on details, as I have a feeling that there is much more here than meets the eye. For example, I find it interesting that one of the complaints about the teacher is not that he branded his students, but that he branded crosses on them. I would think that and branding of a student by a teacher would be enough grounds for immediate dismissal and filing of criminal charges against the teacher in question. Neither of those things have taken place.
What are we not being told here?
Bookmarks