Results 1 to 30 of 121

Thread: Another fun chart

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default Re: Another fun chart

    Thats so funny Rabbit you screwed up again , the 223 is just a name it is a smaller 22 calibre than the 222
    Do you understand that differently sized bullets are not the same?
    Yes they have different performances , just like you can get ots of 224s with different performances , but since the liomitation is only to rifles of the 22 calibre category then it is only rifles of 22 calibre category and that is a bloody big category

    Tribes, if you think the picture was showing a "big 22" then you are the one talking bollox.
    Are you trying to say it is a smaller 22 and they have used photoshop then ? blimey they did a good job you can't see the seams at all , it certainly looks bigger doesn't it .

    22s are only useful for paper targets and squirrels/rabbits. They are trash for self defense.
    Is that why the US Navy seals use .22 pistols . I never knew seals hunted rabbits .

    Also, it effectively bans .38 cal guns as well since most .38s are built to also use .357s.
    the ban is on 357 guns and ammunition , you can have a 38 but you are not allowed to buy or put 357s into it , you know its part of the law they have .

    So yes, for our purposes here, the Mexican law is a gun ban.
    So for your purposes being allowed to have shotguns , rifles and handguns = a gun ban . Friggng moonbats .
    Well there you go the reason for the high level of kilings in America despite not having the same social demographics as third world banana republics is obviously because there are lots of moonbats there .

  2. #2
    Prince of Maldonia Member Toby and Kiki Champion, Goo Slasher Champion, Frogger Champion woad&fangs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    2,884

    Default Re: Another fun chart

    Quote Originally Posted by Tribesman View Post
    Thats so funny Rabbit you screwed up again , the 223 is just a name it is a smaller 22 calibre than the 222

    Yes they have different performances , just like you can get ots of 224s with different performances , but since the liomitation is only to rifles of the 22 calibre category then it is only rifles of 22 calibre category and that is a bloody big category
    223 are bigger then 22s tribesy. The bullet itself isn't much bigger but it contains a lot more powder. I know, my family owns a 223 and several 22s. Also, what is the exact wording of this ban? Does it allow only 22 rimfires or are centerfires allowed?

    Quote Originally Posted by Tribesman View Post
    Are you trying to say it is a smaller 22 and they have used photoshop then ? blimey they did a good job you can't see the seams at all , it certainly looks bigger doesn't it .


    Is that why the US Navy seals use .22 pistols . I never knew seals hunted rabbits .
    The cartridge on the right is a 22, the one on the left which you claim to be a 22 is NOT. I'm not sure what exactly its caliber is but it is not a 22. Also, I don't believe SEALs carry 22s. They most likely carry 9mms or .45s.

    Quote Originally Posted by Tribesman View Post
    the ban is on 357 guns and ammunition , you can have a 38 but you are not allowed to buy or put 357s into it , you know its part of the law they have .


    So for your purposes being allowed to have shotguns , rifles and handguns = a gun ban . Friggng moonbats .
    Well there you go the reason for the high level of kilings in America despite not having the same social demographics as third world banana republics is obviously because there are lots of moonbats there .
    O deary me, you mean that law you won't post a link to. Just like how you won't back up your assertion that SEALs carry 22s. If the law does indeed allow one to purchase a 38/357 handgun but not to purchase 357 ammo then I'm wrong but I'm going off the info your spewing out.
    Last edited by woad&fangs; 07-12-2008 at 21:46.
    Why did the chicken cross the road?

    So that its subjects will view it with admiration, as a chicken which has the daring and courage to boldly cross the road,
    but also with fear, for whom among them has the strength to contend with such a paragon of avian virtue? In such a manner is the princely
    chicken's dominion maintained. ~Machiavelli

  3. #3
    Chieftain of the Pudding Race Member Evil_Maniac From Mars's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    6,407

    Default Re: Another fun chart

    Tribsey, I'm sorry, and you're good at bull, but you don't have a clue what you're talking about when it comes to guns and ammunition.

    Anyways, there's a description of the laws on Wiki.

  4. #4

    Default Re: Another fun chart

    223 are bigger then 22s tribesy.
    Wellthats a turn around , just now you said that if I thought it was bigger I was talking bollox
    Anyhow what did I just write ? the 222 is bigger than the 223 hmmmm..true or false lets see one is a 224 and one is a 2245 which is which ? and are they both 22 are their bigger 22 rounds than the Nato one ? Are they still 22 calibre ? of the wide range of 22 calibre rounds why are none of them actually 22 in size ?

    Also, I don't believe SEALs carry 22s.
    Oh but they do Woad , on their special rabbit hunting operations , you never know when a dastardly wabbit will attack you .
    Lets see , the pistol they use that is a 22 has a name that is very similar to that iconic german pistol , in fact if Elmer Fudd said the name of both pistols you might have difficulty telling them apart as they is so similar .

    If the law does indeed allow one to purchase a 38/357 handgun but not to purchase 357 ammo then I'm wrong but I'm going off the info your spewing out.

    Think about it , what is the big difference between a 38 and a 357, a clue might be in what you noted earlier about interchangability , it isn't the size of the round is it , the actual size of the round wouldn't have caused nasty accidents with guns being able to fit and fire the round but not being able to take it
    But anyway the thing there is with the purchasing of guns and ammunition , you cannot buy guns privately , you can only buy from licenced dealers , the owner and the gun is registered , you are only allowed to buy ammunition for the gun that you have registered from a licenced dealer , simple isn't it . You buy a 38 and you can buy the ammunition for that gun .

  5. #5
    Prince of Maldonia Member Toby and Kiki Champion, Goo Slasher Champion, Frogger Champion woad&fangs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    2,884

    Default Re: Another fun chart

    You claimed that both cartridges in that picture are 22s. One is and one is not.

    Navy Seals carry SIG 9mms and HKUSP45s as standard issue weapons. that's a 9mm and a .45. Not a 22.

    I'm not sure what you are claiming with that last paragraph. Are you claiming 357s are more powerful than .38(true) which causes the guns to break(not take it)? If that's the case than I can tell you that almost every .38 gun can fire .357s cartridges just fine. They're made to be interchangable.

    I like that you brought up that only the state can sell guns and ammo. You forgot to mention earlier that the only way to purchase those is with a licence from the state. A license which you can only get if you are part of a shooting club and there are no public shooting ranges in Mexico.

    So yes, if you're a yacht owning bourgeusie who can afford his monthly country club shooting range fees there isn't a ban.
    Why did the chicken cross the road?

    So that its subjects will view it with admiration, as a chicken which has the daring and courage to boldly cross the road,
    but also with fear, for whom among them has the strength to contend with such a paragon of avian virtue? In such a manner is the princely
    chicken's dominion maintained. ~Machiavelli

  6. #6

    Default Re: Another fun chart

    Navy Seals carry SIG 9mms and HKUSP45s as standard issue weapons. that's a 9mm and a .45. Not a 22.
    you missed the Ruger
    to which you can add the HDM which is also a 22 .


    You forgot to mention earlier that the only way to purchase those is with a licence from the state.
    Wow you mean the government is in charge of firearm regulation ...thats shocking that is whatever next , I suppose you are going to shock us all withsomedramtic revelation about government control of issuing a driving licence

  7. #7
    The very model of a modern Moderator Xiahou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    in the cloud.
    Posts
    9,007

    Default Re: Another fun chart

    Quote Originally Posted by woad&fangs View Post
    I'm not sure what you are claiming with that last paragraph. Are you claiming 357s are more powerful than .38(true) which causes the guns to break(not take it)? If that's the case than I can tell you that almost every .38 gun can fire .357s cartridges just fine. They're made to be interchangable
    Well, to be completely accurate, a .38 revolver can't fire .357 magnum rounds. The shells are longer so they won't fit in the cylinder. OTOH, a .357 can load and fire .38s with no problem at all. In practice, no one really buys .38s much anymore since a .357 is much more versatile being able to fire .38s, their high pressure variants and the .357.

    Tribes is completely out of his depth here, and to top it all off, he's not even reading the law correctly- I guess that's the benefit of never providing any sources. You don't have to keep your facts straight.
    "Don't believe everything you read online."
    -Abraham Lincoln

  8. #8
    Arena Senior Member Crazed Rabbit's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Between the Mountain and the Sound
    Posts
    11,074
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: Another fun chart

    Quote Originally Posted by Tribesman View Post
    Thats so funny Rabbit you screwed up again , the 223 is just a name it is a smaller 22 calibre than the 222
    The 222? What are you talking about? Stop listing off strings of numbers you claim are calibers with no information if you want people to even read your posts in this thread anymore and not just laugh at you.

    The .22 is a weak round. Exotic calibers near in size like the .224 WSSM don't really pertain to this discussion because they are a novelty compared to the .22 and, in the US, the .223.

    How many guns in Mexico are chambered in a .22X caliber and achieve comparable results to the .223 Remington (equivalent to the cartridge used by the US) and are not used by any state forces (which would mean they can't be owned)?

    Is that why the US Navy seals use .22 pistols . I never knew seals hunted rabbits .
    Link for this assertion? Would that be their regular sidearm or just for when they can sneak to ten feet of a guy and pop him in the head?

    So for your purposes being allowed to have shotguns , rifles and handguns = a gun ban . Friggng moonbats .
    Well there you go the reason for the high level of kilings in America despite not having the same social demographics as third world banana republics is obviously because there are lots of moonbats there .
    So if a country banned all books but those under 100 pages, banned those used by universities, restricted the use of modern printing presses, didn't let people speak freely on public property, etc., etc., you'd argue that they had free speech?

    And, of course, their's other restrictions Mexico has on getting guns than just their caliber. And they have very severe laws for mere possession of one bullet of a forbidden caliber. Also, I think you may not have even gotten Mexico's laws right.

    Yet that has done nothing to stop crime.

    Are you trying to say it is a smaller 22 and they have used photoshop then ? blimey they did a good job you can't see the seams at all , it certainly looks bigger doesn't it .
    Wow, you really have no idea what you're talking about. You know tribesy, even accepting that you usually just troll threads you usually have some semblance of an idea of what's going on. Sadly (for you), that is clearly not the case here.

    what's more, when a gun was the only suitable defense and a melee weapon would not have sufficed?
    You're looking at this thing the wrong way. One doesn't try to decide, when faced with an attacker, what's the minimum force and tool you could, possibly, use and not suffer serious harm. If a person comes at me such that I would consider using a weapon of any sort to defend myself, then they are serious about hurting me and I am going to take the safest course of action for myself.

    CR
    Ja Mata, Tosa.

    The poorest man may in his cottage bid defiance to all the forces of the Crown. It may be frail; its roof may shake; the wind may blow through it; the storm may enter; the rain may enter; but the King of England cannot enter – all his force dares not cross the threshold of the ruined tenement! - William Pitt the Elder

  9. #9

    Default Re: Another fun chart

    The 222? What are you talking about? Stop listing off strings of numbers you claim are calibers with no information if you want people to even read your posts in this thread anymore and not just laugh at you.
    Oh but rabbit I thought you was a gun fetishist surely you should know that the 222 (which is a .22) was the fatter but shorter round than the 223 by the same manufacturer who also made another version of the 222 (which was also a .22) but it was the same width as the .223 but longer .
    So if both versions of the 222 rounds are .22 calibre then the 223 is also a .22 calibre round even though it is thinner than one and shorter than the other .
    If it is a .22 round then the gun is a .22 gun , simple isn't it .

    Link for this assertion?
    awwwww would you like a little list of sidearms used by the US military Rabbitgo on have a little look on the net and see if you can spot the RugerII and the HDM on it both of which are .22

    And they have very severe laws for mere possession of one bullet of a forbidden caliber.
    Hey Rabbit I thought you was in favour of strict enforcement of firearm legislation . Did you change your mind or something ?

    So if a country banned all books but those under 100 pages, banned those used by universities, restricted the use of modern printing presses, didn't let people speak freely on public property, etc., etc., you'd argue that they had free speech?
    Is that one of them scarecrow thingies like when it sure don't look like Kansas Toto ?
    If you remember the claim was that Mexico had banned private ownership of guns , so for your little lame attempt there to work it would have to be a ban on all books even those under 100 pages

    Also, I think you may not have even gotten Mexico's laws right.
    I know , I took some of it from that Dave Kopel idiot on the second amendment project site , I knew I shouldn't have relied on a gun nut for accurate information .

  10. #10

    Default Re: Another fun chart

    Well, to be completely accurate, a .38 revolver can't fire .357 magnum rounds.
    But they used to , the .357 design was changed for exactly the reason that it fitted the same as a .38 special and the resuts could be unpleasant .

    Tribes is completely out of his depth here
    OK Mr smarty , when is a .22 not a .22 ? is it perhaps on the same occasion that a .45 isn't a .45 ?

  11. #11
    Arena Senior Member Crazed Rabbit's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Between the Mountain and the Sound
    Posts
    11,074
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: Another fun chart

    Oh but rabbit I thought you was a gun fetishist surely you should know that the 222 (which is a .22) was the fatter but shorter round than the 223 by the same manufacturer who also made another version of the 222 (which was also a .22) but it was the same width as the .223 but longer .
    So if both versions of the 222 rounds are .22 calibre then the 223 is also a .22 calibre round even though it is thinner than one and shorter than the other .
    If it is a .22 round then the gun is a .22 gun , simple isn't it
    No, you're again wrong.

    A ".22" is only a .22 caliber round - most commonly the .22LR. It does not include every cartridge that starts with .22xxx under the sun. A .22 round is not a .223 round, and so .22 is not an umbrella term that fits a .223 or a .224 caliber.

    "can you see how that's different? Because it's a different number? Because it has a different number of digits? And how those different numbers mean different things? Do you understand that differently sized bullets are not the same?"
    I know , I took some of it from that Dave Kopel idiot on the second amendment project site , I knew I shouldn't have relied on a gun nut for accurate information .
    Don't go blaming others for your out-spoken ignorance.
    go on have a little look on the net and see if you can spot the RugerII and the HDM on it both of which are .22
    No. You provide the info that you are basing your posts on.

    And why can't you answer this question:

    How many guns in Mexico are chambered in a .22X caliber and achieve comparable results to the .223 Remington (equivalent to the cartridge used by the US) and are not used by any state forces (which would mean they can't be owned)?

    The standard tribesy question: are you being ignorant or obtuse?

    Well, let's move on, as its clear tribesy will argue a country that kills you on sight if you have anything but a one shot, .17 caliber derringer that took five years and 50k to acquire legally hasn't banned guns.

    CR
    Ja Mata, Tosa.

    The poorest man may in his cottage bid defiance to all the forces of the Crown. It may be frail; its roof may shake; the wind may blow through it; the storm may enter; the rain may enter; but the King of England cannot enter – all his force dares not cross the threshold of the ruined tenement! - William Pitt the Elder

  12. #12
    Feeding the Peanut Gallery Senior Member Redleg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Denver working on the Railroad
    Posts
    10,660

    Default Re: Another fun chart

    Oh what fun.... The article from the Mexico Law

    Quote Originally Posted by LEY FEDERAL DE ARMAS DE FUEGO Y EXPLOSIVOS

    Artículo 11.- Las armas, municiones y materia para el uso exclusivo del Ejército, Armada y Fuerza
    Aérea, son las siguientes:
    a).- Revólveres calibre .357 Magnum y los superiores a .38 Especial.
    b).- Pistolas calibre 9 mm. Parabellum, Luger y similares, las .38 Super y Comando, y las de calibres
    superiores.
    c).- Fusiles, mosquetones, carabinas y tercerolas en calibre .223, 7 mm., 7. 62 mm. y carabinas
    calibre .30 en todos sus modelos.
    d).- Pistolas, carabinas y fusiles con sistema de ráfaga, sub-ametralladoras, metralletas y
    ametralladoras en todos sus calibres.
    e).- Escopetas con cañón de longitud inferior a 635 mm. (25), las de calibre superior al 12 (.729 ó 18.
    5 mm) y las lanzagases, con excepción de las de uso industrial.
    f).- Municiones para las armas anteriores y cartuchos con artificios especiales como trazadores,
    incendiarios, perforantes, fumígenos, expansivos de gases y los cargados con postas superiores al 00
    (.84 cms. de diámetro) para escopeta.
    g).- Cañones, piezas de artillería, morteros y carros de combate con sus aditamentos, accesorios,
    proyectiles y municiones.
    h).- Proyectiles-cohete, torpedos, granadas, bombas, minas, cargas de profundidad, lanzallamas y
    similares, así como los aparatos, artificios y máquinas para su lanzamiento.
    i).- Bayonetas, sables y lanzas.
    j).- Navíos, submarinos, embarcaciones e hidroaviones para la guerra naval y su armamento.
    k).- Aeronaves de guerra y su armamento.
    l).- Artificios de guerra, gases y substancias químicas de aplicación exclusivamente militar, y los
    ingenios diversos para su uso por las fuerzas armadas.
    En general, todas las armas, municiones y materiales destinados exclusivamente para la guerra.
    Las de este destino, mediante la justificación de la necesidad, podrán autorizarse por la Secretaría de
    la Defensa Nacional, individualmente o como corporación, a quienes desempeñen empleos o cargos de
    la Federación, del Distrito Federal, de los Estados o de los Municipios.
    http://www.diputados.gob.mx/LeyesBiblio/pdf/102.pdf

    Basically what it says concerning the arguement about .223 caliber weapons is that the caliber is for the exculisive use of the military in Mexico.
    Last edited by Redleg; 07-13-2008 at 01:52.
    O well, seems like 'some' people decide to ruin a perfectly valid threat. Nice going guys... doc bean

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO