Another fun chart

[Evil_Maniac From Mars]

Tribsey, I'm sorry, and you're good at bull, but you don't have a clue what you're talking about when it comes to guns and ammunition.

Anyways, there's a description of the laws on Wiki.

[Tribesman]

223 are bigger then 22s tribesy.

Wellthats a turn around , just now you said that if I thought it was bigger I was talking bollox
Anyhow what did I just write ? the 222 is bigger than the 223 hmmmm..true or false lets see one is a 224 and one is a 2245 which is which ? and are they both 22 are their bigger 22 rounds than the Nato one ? Are they still 22 calibre ? of the wide range of 22 calibre rounds why are none of them actually 22 in size ?

Also, I don't believe SEALs carry 22s.

Oh but they do Woad , on their special rabbit hunting operations , you never know when a dastardly wabbit will attack you .
Lets see , the pistol they use that is a 22 has a name that is very similar to that iconic german pistol , in fact if Elmer Fudd said the name of both pistols you might have difficulty telling them apart as they is so similar .

If the law does indeed allow one to purchase a 38/357 handgun but not to purchase 357 ammo then I'm wrong but I'm going off the info your spewing out.

Think about it , what is the big difference between a 38 and a 357, a clue might be in what you noted earlier about interchangability , it isn't the size of the round is it , the actual size of the round wouldn't have caused nasty accidents with guns being able to fit and fire the round but not being able to take it
But anyway the thing there is with the purchasing of guns and ammunition , you cannot buy guns privately , you can only buy from licenced dealers , the owner and the gun is registered , you are only allowed to buy ammunition for the gun that you have registered from a licenced dealer , simple isn't it . You buy a 38 and you can buy the ammunition for that gun .

[woad&fangs]

You claimed that both cartridges in that picture are 22s. One is and one is not.

Navy Seals carry SIG 9mms and HKUSP45s as standard issue weapons. that's a 9mm and a .45. Not a 22.

I'm not sure what you are claiming with that last paragraph. Are you claiming 357s are more powerful than .38(true) which causes the guns to break(not take it)? If that's the case than I can tell you that almost every .38 gun can fire .357s cartridges just fine. They're made to be interchangable.

I like that you brought up that only the state can sell guns and ammo. You forgot to mention earlier that the only way to purchase those is with a licence from the state. A license which you can only get if you are part of a shooting club and there are no public shooting ranges in Mexico.

So yes, if you're a yacht owning bourgeusie who can afford his monthly country club shooting range fees there isn't a ban.

[Tribesman]

Navy Seals carry SIG 9mms and HKUSP45s as standard issue weapons. that's a 9mm and a .45. Not a 22.

you missed the Ruger
to which you can add the HDM which is also a 22 .

You forgot to mention earlier that the only way to purchase those is with a licence from the state.

Wow you mean the government is in charge of firearm regulation ...thats shocking that is whatever next , I suppose you are going to shock us all withsomedramtic revelation about government control of issuing a driving licence

[Xiahou]

I'm not sure what you are claiming with that last paragraph. Are you claiming 357s are more powerful than .38(true) which causes the guns to break(not take it)? If that's the case than I can tell you that almost every .38 gun can fire .357s cartridges just fine. They're made to be interchangable

Well, to be completely accurate, a .38 revolver can't fire .357 magnum rounds. The shells are longer so they won't fit in the cylinder. OTOH, a .357 can load and fire .38s with no problem at all. In practice, no one really buys .38s much anymore since a .357 is much more versatile being able to fire .38s, their high pressure variants and the .357.

Tribes is completely out of his depth here, and to top it all off, he's not even reading the law correctly- I guess that's the benefit of never providing any sources. You don't have to keep your facts straight.