Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Question - attack value vs. lethality

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    EB annoying hornet Member bovi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    11,796

    Default Re: Question - attack value vs. lethality

    It depends on which troops they are matched against. A low attack value with high lethality is good against those who have weak defense, as they will overcome the defense often despite the low attack. A higher attack value is better against troops with high defense, as you won't get to use the lethality at all if no hit lands.

    Having problems getting EB2 to run? Try these solutions.
    ================
    I do NOT answer PM requests for help with EB. Ask in a new help thread in the tech help forum.
    ================
    I think computer viruses should count as life. I think it says something about human nature that the only form of life we have created so far is purely destructive. We've created life in our own image. - Stephen Hawking

  2. #2

    Default Re: Question - attack value vs. lethality

    If your fighting mostly units with lots of heavy armour, the Basilikon Agema are your boys *they use an ap Kopis sword.* Otherwise, the Galatian with their celtic longswords and javelins take the cake.
    I shouldn't have to live in a world where all the good points are horrible ones.

    Is he hurt? Everybody asks that. Nobody ever says, 'What a mess! I hope the doctor is not emotionally harmed by having to deal with it.'

  3. #3

    Default Re: Question - attack value vs. lethality

    Thanks for the answers.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO