But he wouldn't have to. He could take on his role with less knowledge than the lower end spectrum of politicians.
But the stability is gone; it'd be no more stable than the average Western democracy. In addition to that, the parliament could of course also change.He could - and that is the beauty of monarchism. Anyone can be a monarchist, whether they are on the left or right of the political spectrum. Likewise, the king can have a specific political idealogy. However, that is why we have a parliament. They can balance each other.
Bookmarks