Quote Originally Posted by Adrian II View Post
Fortuyn's death had nothing to do with Wilders' cause or with Islam as a whole. The fact that you throw him in proves how easily people are confused about these issues.
The fact that you do not see a connection proves how confused you still are over these issues. (yay! At last, exchanging YouTube-esque back-and-forth insults on the .org. )

Who killed Fortuyn? Not a Muslim. An alarmist extreme leftwinger did. As a pre-emptive strike. Fortuyn, he thought, and this was a common notion, would've plunged the Netherlands into fascism and dictatorship. It the mind of this blinded ideologist, it was 1933 and this was his last change to stop Auschwitz.

Van Gogh was killed by a Muslim. But this was almost incidental. One mistaken fanatic.

Worse is what happened to the co-author of his movie, Hirsi Ali. Chosen one of the world's 100 most influential thinkers. One of the most foremost European Muslims. For both reasons, the Hague should've made an all-out effort to protect her, just to make a statement that Dutch society does not stand for political murder and intimidation.
What happened? Within two years of the murder of Van Gogh, she, a member of parliament no less, was driven away from the Netherlands. By whom? Not by Muslims. By blinded ideologists. Jealous of her status, furious that she, uppity Muslim, did not tow the correct multicultural discourse. Some way to honour Van Gogh. I'd go so far as to say that it was a renewed murder of Van Gogh, commited, again, not by Muslims, but by blinded ideologists.

And if Wilders is ever murdered, driven out, or otherwise censored, again it won't be by Muslims.