Originally Posted by PanzerJaeger He was not "legally bound" to drive a terrorist around, so your logical leap didn't quite make it. This isn't really anything new. If you're employed by a criminal, you may be subject to litigation. There are lessons to be learned here somewhere.... Right. I assume the Enron executives had personal drivers too. It's your opinion that they should be sentenced too, right?
Still maintain that crying on the pitch should warrant a 3 match ban
Forum Rules
Bookmarks