So you are assuming; and in your assumptions you are maintaining that he has already received enough punishment. Cool.

I just wanted to make sure that I understood what you were doing.

If saddam were to have someone locked in a prison which is infamous for him torturing people in how big a leap of logic would it be to assume that the prisnor is being tortured ?

Gauntanamo is infamous throughout the world and its torture methods well known and defended by the administration, and put in place to deal with terrorists, which is exactly what they think this guy is, i would also assume an egg dropped from any great hieght would break upon contact with the floor and im assuming the world won't end tommorow....

The assumption i think you could however question is the one of his limited involvment, with a lack of other evidence, available to us here at the .org, i have been unable to decide whether the american goverment has other evidence or whether this is done soley because he was Osama's driver, i have decided to approach the issue as if it was done soley because he drove for Osama this is the bigger assumption, but has been made based on a lack of evidence saying otherwise....

Out of interest i remember some american company sent over people to try and do a deal with the Taliban to build a pipeline through afghanastan, as it happens the deal didn't work outbut if it had would these guys be hauled into gauntanamo through the guilt by association train of thought ?

or as rich non-muslim americans would they be given the benefit of the doubt ?