PC Mode
Org Mobile Site
Forum > Rome: Total War > Europa Barbarorum >
Thread: Pheraspidai?
Che Roriniho 10:47 08-09-2008
Hello there. I am currently playing through a Makedonia Campaign, and for some reason, neither on the RV, or in the game, I don't seem to be able to recruit Pheraspidai ANYWHERE, even though my Unit Cards collection states the contrary. My guess is that they were taken out, but why? They fill a gap that nothing else really fills, other than perhaps the Peltastai Makedonai, but from all I can tell, these are very lacking when it comes to ability (see the surprisingly bad units thread).

I was going to stick these behind the Hypaspists in my Formation, so as to have a Royal Guard, nbut this seems impossible. Ummmm... help?

Reply
Ludens 10:55 08-09-2008
Pheraspidai were renamed Peltastai Makedonike in the latest build.

Reply
Legosoldier 10:56 08-09-2008
the pheraspidai are peltastai makedonikoi. they are pretty much the same units.

Reply
Che Roriniho 10:56 08-09-2008
Originally Posted by Ludens:
Pheraspidai were renamed Peltastai Makedonike in the latest build.
Oh right... more historical question, but would these feature in Alexandros' armies?

Reply
Ludens 21:11 08-09-2008
Alexander used his hypaspistai for assault missions, but how these would have been equipped I have no idea. IIRC they were used both as pikemen and in more open-order formations. The elite peltasts were also recruited from the best of the Macedonian recruitment system, but this wasn't in place yet in Alexander's time.

Reply
abou 21:26 08-09-2008
My theory is that the Hypaspistai were phalangites and that the Agema of the Hypaspistai were hoplites. That seems to coordinate better with their development into the arygraspides and what not.

Reply
||Lz3|| 01:01 08-10-2008
I remember that in age of mithology hyspaspistai were just the average swordsmen

em... offtopic... nevermind <.<

Reply
Zarax 07:00 08-10-2008
Originally Posted by abou:
My theory is that the Hypaspistai were phalangites and that the Agema of the Hypaspistai were hoplites. That seems to coordinate better with their development into the arygraspides and what not.
It could also be something like this: Nobles or richer landowners who wanted to fight on foot fought as peltastai makedonoi when younger and more agile, later as hypaspists when they were more grizzled and finally as argiraspidai towards the end of their military career.

It's all assumptions of course but it would sound logical to me.

Reply
abou 10:51 08-13-2008
Not really. Neither during Alexander's time or later - at least as far as I understand it. O'Etairos knows more about Makedonia than I do, but the peltastai were an Antigonid development that derived from phalangites operating in roles other than the phalanx. It became a permanent unit and replaced the hypaspistai on the battlefield. In Makdonia, the hypaspistai were bodyguards and personal enforcers of the king. The argyraspides were veteran phalangites (and said to be formed by a core of hypaspistai and hence my toughts on the difference of equipment between the hypaspistai and agema) in Alexander's time, and probably the sons of military settlers during the Seleukid era.

Are you talking about the Antigonids or the Seleukids or Alexander?

Reply
Zarax 11:15 08-13-2008
In this case I was talking about the successors in general, might have mixed things I heard about different armies though.

Reply
Centurio Nixalsverdrus 13:23 08-13-2008
So the Hypaspistai din't really play a role on the battlefield in EB's timeframe? I hope you ain't going to remove them... After all the player can decide if he wants to fill them with new life (like the whole empire).

Reply
Tiberius Aurelius Cotta 16:45 08-13-2008
PLEASE don't remove the Hypaspistai...

Those things + elephants + Peltastai Makedonikoi = gg Ptolemaioi :D. They made my morning complete

Reply
Spartan198 18:40 08-13-2008
Please, I implore the EB team in all your knowledge and glory, do not remove the Hypaspistai from EB!

Reply
abou 19:42 08-13-2008
Oh, well, now the obvious choice is that we have to.

Reply
Che Roriniho 19:45 08-13-2008
Originally Posted by abou:
Oh, well, now the obvious choice is that we have to.
Don't you... *steals balloon*

HA! You're now in Balloon Debt! HA!

Sorry.

Reply
Ibrahim 22:38 08-13-2008
moral of the lesson: never give the EB team (known for mental sadism), any ideas whatsoever

I see though what abou is aiming at. If the Hypaspistai were merely the immediate footguard and officer corp (which became the core of the Argyraspids' officers) after Alexander's timeperiod, and some operated permanently in the peltast role, and then replaced the hypaspists on the battlefield, then we really do not need the hypaspists, in makedonia to begin with. at least, that's how i'm seeing this.

all this is confusing, but its going somewhere.

Reply
Tiberius Aurelius Cotta 11:56 08-16-2008
don't give him any ideas!!! they are EB's best unit!

well, as far as my limited experience can attest to

Reply
Up
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO