Not even close. The ranking is gold, then silver then bronze. Bronze does not equal gold outside of childcare facilities.
Mind you I have argued for a per capita ranking... slight reason for a bias... that way Australia's 4 Golds is equivalent to China having about 250 gold medals...
Yeap, watching the Olympics. A shame that when I see a record broken I think 'Wow, how long before those drugs are found?".
As a form of entertainment they can be great. As a way of 'measuring' the respective successes of different government system they are about as accurate as GDP or BMI. A rule of thumb at best, a casual hand wave more likely then a clinically accurate form of stat.
I prefer to see money being spent on sporting facilities, tourism and language development then for weapons facilities, political prisons and spooks. Then again I would prefer more money spent on science and arts and a Computer game Olympics.
I watch and sometimes I get to see what I really like behind the glitz and ego. Sportsmanship and some truly humble athletes breaking themselves apart and trying with all their might to just finish.
Eddie the Eagle and others of his ilk are the ones to watch for. The marathon's never fail to please in seeing someone push themselves to the wall. I like seeing people push past their physical limits, making a PB and all through hard work and willpower. The drug cheats diminish from this... that is why it is often good to see the amateurs at the back of the pack pushing on.
http://blogs.nzherald.co.nz/blog/bei...ries/?c_id=502
Bookmarks