Poll: Should the Augustan Reforms be removed?

Be advised that this is a public poll: other users can see the choice(s) you selected.

Results 1 to 30 of 198

Thread: Poll: Should the Augustan Reforms be removed?

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #26
    Terrible Tactician Member Shadowwalker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Germania Libera *g*
    Posts
    323

    Default Re: Poll: Should the Augustan Reforms be removed?

    Although I like playing SPQR very much I'd like to see the last reform removed.
    EB is not about Romans alone and I rather have ten new factions presented adequate in terms of units then having a reform I never reach without cheating.

    Would recommend to have a reform event if that pleases someone, also it would be okay in my opinion to stick one or two of the aux. cavalry units to the reform. The archers and the spear infantry auxilia (forgot the name since I never had them due to not reaching the reform) I would like to have but not at the cost of losing a highly necessary unit for one of the new factions.

    *votes for removal*

    EDIT:

    posted by a completely inoffensive name:
    Honestly, the game gets unhistorical by 200 B.C. so I figure the game should just be cut to 27 B.C. and the imperial reforms and units removed. Its dissapointing to hear that some units could not be added due to unit limit and here is the "imperial units" which were only historically used for the last 31 years of the game. So basically, make the end 27 B.C. get rid of the imperial units and i am sure everyone will enjoy the units that fill those spots, whatever faction they may be.
    Totally agree, to say it the sarcastic way:
    Where's the difference between LS and Augustan Units?
    Last edited by Shadowwalker; 02-13-2009 at 22:50.
    Finished EB Campaigns: Kart-Hadast 1.0/1.2 | Pontos 1.1 | Arche Seleukeia 1.2 | Hayasdan 1.2 | Sab'yn 1.2 | Makedonia 1.2 (Alex)
    Lost Campaigns (1.2, Alex. exe): Getai | Sab'Yn
    Ongoing campaigns (1.2): SPQR (110 BC) | Sab'yn (217 BC) | Pontos (215 BC)
    from Populus Romanus

    "The state of human ethics can be summarized in two sentences: We ought to. But we don't." (Tucholsky)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO