(1) I don't want to start a religion discussion. This is definitly not the place for it. And as I want everyone to respect my philosophy of life I have to do the same to the philosophy of others (as long as it is legal...)
(2) The legend of the ark is - as many other parts of, if not the whole - Old Testament, borrowed from earlier cultures.
To specify it: the Sumerians had a long tale (much longer than the Bible one) about Zi-U-Sud-Ra (in babylonian language: Utnapischtim; accadian: Atra-Hasis) who built a ship rescuing him, his family (and iirc some friends of this family) and of course animals (and plants) from the flood.
He did so in following an order from his god E-A/En-Ki. E-A's brother En-Lil had decided to destroy mankind but E-A wasn't pleased about this decision as mankind was his creation.*
There is a lot of speculation on this topic, hundreds of scientists and wanna-be-scientists searched for the ark. A couple of years ago some "fans of creationism" claimed they had found it at the Ararat, but when a geologist went there to examine the "proofs" he found ...
nothing.
Nobody ever found anything that would proof the existense of a boat that was used to survive the flood.
So this legend is really nothing I like to see in EB II.
It's something you can discuss with friends while sitting in a bar (but make sure that it doesn't come to a religious discussion - such discussions can kill friendships really quick) but EB is about history not fantasy.
(3) If I sound harsh you have my apologies, that was not my intention.

I'm just not very good at speaking english when it comes to such special themes.
EDIT: Oh, and the Bible speaks of Noah, not Moses that built the ark...
*A whole lot of irritations about the Old Testament would be unnecessary if the bible scientists (right term?) would accept that the monotheistic Christendom (at least the Genesis) is just an excerpt from the much older sumerian/babylonian/egyptian/early indian religions (which all have the same core btw).
For example: why says God that his creation was good just to have a few lines further the opposite opinion? If you read the sumerian text (I obviously also didn't read the original ... I wish I had some fifty years of spraetime to learn cuneiform
) you will find that E-A is pleased with the creation but En-Ki is not...
The author(s) of the Old Testament just merged the two sumerian gods into one new: Yahwe.
Bookmarks