Deleting/Moving posts

[ArtistofWarfare]

On the topic of that, IMO its not appropriate for your signature, ATPG could ask for it to be removed. Plus, he stated that he did not click on the link, as it would be a waste of his time. So, not only is it not appropriate, its not correct either.

Now, care to answer the question in the other thread?

You've trolled my personal page 4 times today and the moderators here are aware of all 4 cases of such...yet you're still posting.

This is a perfect example of the selective moderation that goes on behind the scenes here. There are different rules, for different members. This is what I don't like (and doubt anyone really does other than the pets).

edit: For all you know, Tosa and I have had a lengthy discussion on the matter via PM. You are not Tosa...therefore, you do not know what Tosa knows. Why don't you just worry about yourself, and go back to life as usual here on the .org. Clearly, you are just trying to argue with me. This is not a "Pevergreen" topic.

[pevergreen]

no this is not a "Pevergreen" topic, i dont know who "Pevergreen" is.

Trolling? No. I'm just making sure you know of the question. Yes, sure for all we know, you and Tosa are next to each other right now, having tea. But we don't know that.

User Pages are not subject to off topic rules etc. Not only have the 4 posts I've made there been outside 24 hours, in fact 1 was talking about a funny dueling video, the other was quoting romeo and juliet.

I made it quite clear to you, I am using your own posted logic against you. You stated (on a thread that is no longer visible) that you are sick of "selective" moderating, and that you have copied the post to repost it when it was deleted. Surprisingly, thats all I did AoW. So, did you enjoy having a single thing posted TWICE on your userpage! That must have been terrible. Maybe you understand what the moderators have to go through each time they are forced to edit or move a post. Or if you haven't got the point, I might be able to force myself to continue using your incorrect logic. Its not good for my health though.

[ArtistofWarfare]

no this is not a "Pevergreen" topic, i dont know who "Pevergreen" is.

Trolling? No. I'm just making sure you know of the question. Yes, sure for all we know, you and Tosa are next to each other right now, having tea. But we don't know that.

User Pages are not subject to off topic rules etc. Not only have the 4 posts I've made there been outside 24 hours, in fact 1 was talking about a funny dueling video, the other was quoting romeo and juliet.

I made it quite clear to you, I am using your own posted logic against you. You stated (on a thread that is no longer visible) that you are sick of "selective" moderating, and that you have copied the post to repost it when it was deleted. Surprisingly, thats all I did AoW. So, did you enjoy having a single thing posted TWICE on your userpage! That must have been terrible. Maybe you understand what the moderators have to go through each time they are forced to edit or move a post. Or if you haven't got the point, I might be able to force myself to continue using your incorrect logic. Its not good for my health though.

You're repeatedly posing a question that has already been answered. Further, you are not the one who posed the question - I do not understand why it's YOU who keeps repeating it. It's none of your concern.

Regarding the rest of the post: Uh, ok.

Now back to the discussion.

[pevergreen]

Yet repeatedly posting something that's been deleted is ok though?

[ArtistofWarfare]

Yet repeatedly posting something that's been deleted is ok though?

Where do you see me posting about ANY of this today other than to respond to your repeated baiting?

I have written many posts today. Some lengthy. All either game or history related other than posts like these (to respond to you).

I have even supplied you with a link to analysis of The Battle of Waterloo, which you claimed to be a battle that you were not familiar with. You thanked me for this link and our conversation there continues. Other than of course, when I have to stop and respond to your repeated trolling of my personal page WHILE we're having the discussion on the Battle of Waterloo in the thread.

I just don't understand what you want.

Go back to the thread I'm referring to and we'll discuss it - I'm not acting. I'm genuinely interested in the conversation (I keep stressing in this in multiple threads).

p.s.- As I check that thread again, I notice it's now locked. I mean, see what I'm saying? I was just about to post this, checked that thread for the link - and locked.

https://forums.totalwar.org/vb/showt...35#post2014835

This is the kind of stuff I have an issue with. I did nothing wrong in that thread and the discussion was ...far better than some of the others around here. It was ATPG's thread. I'm supporting it, and complementing it.

edit: And now I've been issued 2 warning points for THAT thread. This place is unbelievable. Look at my posts from tonight. I have never received one prior warning in my 520+ posts (so many have been deleted). Tonight - 2 warning points. This is total proof that there is horrible bias on these forums.

[pevergreen]

I am aware, however, after going downstairs on a thought trip (returning with a bountiful harvest of chips) I realised i was stepping out of line, so I asked Martok to edit out all parts of the off topic conversation we had. I edited out mine (as you can see by my edit lines, all within a minute) and I can only presume Martok is doing that.

Once thats all gone, I am sure we can continue our civil discussion. We had a good one going.

[ArtistofWarfare]

I am aware, however, after going downstairs on a thought trip (returning with a bountiful harvest of chips) I realised i was stepping out of line, so I asked Martok to edit out all parts of the off topic conversation we had. I edited out mine (as you can see by my edit lines, all within a minute) and I can only presume Martok is doing that.

Once thats all gone, I am sure we can continue our civil discussion. We had a good one going.

You know what - You just apologized in so many words. In my mind, we're back at square one - I agree, let's just move forward.

Yet look at my edit.

2 warning points.

Yes, this thread IS perfect proof that there is bias. Now of course that "other thread" will be edited, changed, altered ...whatever. But the fact remains, 1/3rd of my posts are locked/deleted/moved and I'm issued warning points even when the most anti- AoW members agree they stepped out of line with me.

What's the sense? Why even post? ...

[TosaInu]

edit: For all you know, Tosa and I have had a lengthy discussion on the matter via PM. You are not Tosa...therefore, you do not know what Tosa knows.

Hello ArtistofWarfare,

Not all that likely: you chose the public path, also in a way that frustrated my nostrils. But I'll check my PM-box.

There's a PM 09-12-2008, 20:24 by you 'Deleted Posts - Disgusting'.

Since you also started these topics, I replied here instead at 09-12-2008, 21:14 of replying by PM.

A bit later (09-12-2008, 21:22), while trying to discover what's going on I sent you a zero point warning when I found Citadel topics where you tried to spawn the discussion again, where you pushed your side of the story and being confronting:

Dear ArtistofWarfare,

You have received a warning at The Guild.

Reason:
-------
PM

Hello ArtistofWarfare,

Check the topics in the Watchtower started by you.

This topic is pending. Please do not hi-jack other topics about this.

You sent a reply to that at 09-12-2008, 21:52.

Tosa - At this point, forum rules are relatively meaningless to me around here
.. ..
.. ..

That is not a lengthy discussion really.

Received more attention in the monastery than it would have anywhere else.

That is not a discussion for the Citadel really and it would be moved to a better suited forum. However there was some trouble in it and thus it was moved out of sight for cleaning.

Correct, the Monastery seems a better place for such a discussion. However, it was decided to soft delete and clean it first. That was only the initial easy thought tough.

Conflicts happen. Being insulting is just one. Baiting and being dishonest is another. I asked the same questions twice and you ignored it. People pointed you to the questions more than once and you ignored it. When someone else answers one of the questions, you 'agree'.

I've been reading several posts and got other ideas. This account will be excused to leave.

[KarlXII]

Tosa - At this point, forum rules are relatively meaningless to me around here

Tosa, I think this is where the thread should end. If he wishes to disregard the ToS, well, he shouldn't complain, he shouldn't be making threads complaining, here, twice, and in the Backroom, if the ToS is meaningless to him.

[pevergreen]

I've been reading several posts and got other ideas. This account will be excused to leave.

It seems due to his lack of signature and member group, AoW has been either banned or perma banned.

Regardless, no further conversation is needed, this is my last post