Non, non; design flaws do not exist in the theory of evolution. What ever lives and breeds, lives and breeds. That's all you need to think of.
If a man strongly physically disabled because of his genetics sitting in a wheel chair, a very fit athlete and a woman are the only human survivors left on Earth; and the physically weak man has a gun, while the athelete does not, who'll win the theoretical rivalry between the two? The weak man will just have to shoot the athlete; and in this case, the man sitting in the wheel chair is the fittest, while the athlete is the one who is weak.
It's a false assumption that the human body is meant for anything. It is clear that the enviroment has had its impact on what's ideal; but every enviroment has its pros and cons. There is no such thing as an ultimate enviroment/lifestyle for humans; it fully depends on what goals one want humanity to reach. Numbers? Personal health? Galactical domination? The list goes on for eternity.Of course we are not meant to sit in front of a PC all day as many here including myself probably do, which is why we tend to have so many back problems. We simply aren't using our bodies for what they were designed for (through a creator or evolution).
Bookmarks