A major tragedy. It was a bit unnerving that no finnish poster put it up yesterday. Such a waste of life![]()
A major tragedy. It was a bit unnerving that no finnish poster put it up yesterday. Such a waste of life![]()
He looks a bit like you, Kage. Something you want to tell us, perhaps?
yes, I shamelessly stole that from mouza...
Still maintain that crying on the pitch should warrant a 3 match ban
Well im still alive.He is not.Well all joking aside.I think these things are very alarming and here the discussion is going heavily in direction of banning small arms, while i dont think it is because of gunlaws that these people are dead.I think the problem is in our society.
Ja Mata Tosainu Sama.
How 'bout the combination of vodka and saunas?![]()
Still maintain that crying on the pitch should warrant a 3 match ban
Yeah, I was shocked to read that in the news yesterday -- my condolences to the victims and their families.I always have a hard time picturing tragic events like that occurring in Scandinavia for some reason, even though I know it's not an isolated incident.
I second Fragony's question: Why do you think that? There's always going to be disturbed individuals with violent intentions, no matter what you do.
"MTW is not a game, it's a way of life." -- drone
It's not easy being a man, you know. I had to get dressed today... And there are other pressures.
- Dylan Moran
The Play
I un-second Fragony's question!
Social choices of every society go a long way to explaining why tragedies like this happen. Not guns or an abundance of disturbed individuals are the reason for the difference in levels of violence between South Africa and Iceland, but society at large. Compare, for example, a good road network. A few tragic random occurences, or individual maniacs, are always the direct cause for car accidents. But a good road network, build for safety, goes a long way to preventing car accidents. Better roads mean less accidents. More and better law enforement mean more law-abiding drivers. This means less road rage, which leads to a more respectful driving culture. Etcetera. Society always has a choice.
Finland is not part of Scandinavia...
Finland needs to have another look at their gun laws...
Oh well, for every school shoot out, I noticed that the bullies play a bit more nice for a while... Not everything is bad.
This has to do with the society at large nothing to do with guns. I can't speak for Finland but here in America I have come to the conclusion that our society makes this happen mainly by the way we retard emotional expression esp. at a young age. I dont understand how people think legal firearms make people go crazy. It doesn't make sense
There, but for the grace of God, goes John Bradford
My aim, then, was to whip the rebels, to humble their pride, to follow them to their inmost recesses, and make them fear and dread us. Fear is the beginning of wisdom.
I am tired and sick of war. Its glory is all moonshine. It is only those who have neither fired a shot nor heard the shrieks and groans of the wounded who cry aloud for blood, for vengeance, for desolation.
I heard on the radio that the Police had him in for questioning the day before the shooting because of some disturbing youtube videos where he shoots with his Walter P-22 gun and displaying the slogan : "You will die next"...
Not much unlike Pekka last year.
I guess there will not be a third time.![]()
Status Emeritus
![]()
If you are going to treat it as a social problem you are only inviting more nutjobs to make a statement. It isn't, just a crybaby and a copycat. Feel sorry for the finnish must be very traumatising to have this happening twice in such a small time.
My condolences to the families of the victims.
What kind of a sad narcisist do you have to be to show off your gun skilz on youtube before killing several people randomly and cut your miserable life short before people will hold you accountable?
I don't think that there's something specific about Finland that encourages these kinds of things (except lots of guns) and that it's probably copycat behaviour from TV and internet, but that's just my guess.
Well, if a guy is making threatening videos on the net, then I find it a bitt odd that the law allows him to keep his weapon...
He was in for questionng by the police ebcause of the videos, but they had no right to take his weapon.
See what happened?
So in this particular case, it is (among other things) a question about the law itself.
Bookmarks