Well that's why we're in a you-can't-win. Both Republicans and Democrats are voting against the first couple variants of the bailout in sufficient numbers to stop passage. And that is most certainly in some part because of re-election considerations and public sentiment. I do not believe that the original bill should have been passed as-is. If it had, and that unaccountable money had gone poof, everyone would be blaming the "Democratic congress" anyway, even though a bailout has been high pressured by both McCain and Bush. It's funny that many of you seem quick to condemn that people in Congress seemed as concerned with how they'll come out in the "blame game" when this is said and done, as what's best for the country, and then quickly render your own blame judgments. Congress is never perfect but I think what we have is a result of a) our system and b) the passive aggressive moods of the voters.
I am not sure expecting better than what you're seeing is rational, given the way our system works, and given the way people cast votes. Especially in the House, where all representation is very local and each of those people is there representing a narrow slice of the constituency. I'm horrified by a lot of Bible Belt congresspeople like Coburn but I have no say in him keeping or losing his seat.
Edit: Err Colburn might be Senate? Still the same situation though, no say in his seat. ;)
Bookmarks